“Proposed new guidance recommends that decisions of the family courts should always be published, unless there are compelling reasons against publication. Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division of the High Court, has issued the proposed judiciary guidance to facilitate the ‘need for greater transparency’ in the family courts.”
RPC Privacy Law, 4th September 2013
Source: www.rpc.co.uk
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Carr v Penman [2013] EWHC 2679 (QB) (02 September 2013)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Eclairs Group Ltd & Anor v JKX Oil & Gas Plc & Ors [2013] EWHC 2631 (Ch) (30 August 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
United States of America (USA) v Shlesinger [2013] EWHC 2671 (Admin) (02 September 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] EWHC 2573 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 341
“The provisions in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000 conferring powers to stop, question, and detain a person at a port or border for up to nine hours for the purpose of determining whether he appeared to be a person concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism were not incompatible with article 5, 6 or 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; or with the right to freedom of movement under articles 20 and 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.”
WLR Daily, 28th August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“A direction given by the Secretary of State pursuant to paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 8 to the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 saving specified policies had the effect of also preserving supporting text including the reasoned justification for each policy and descriptive or explanatory material.”
WLR Daily, 22nd August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“For the purposes of the client money rules and the client money distribution rules contained in the Client Assets Sourcebook, CASS 7 and 7A a client’s contractual claim and the amount for which it might prove in respect of such claim fell to be reduced by the amount of any actual or anticipated distribution from the client money pool. The client could not prove for both a claim resulting from a shortfall in the client money trust and the balance of its contractual claim where the shortfall claim did not exceed the contractual claim. However, the rule against double proof did not prevent a claim by a client in respect of a shortfall in payment of its client money entitlement to the extent that it exceeded its contractual claim or in a case where the client had no contractual claim.”
WLR Daily, 16th August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“The Secretary of State was entitled to use the new certification provisions in sections 2C of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, as inserted by section 15 of the Justice and Security Act 2013, to terminate existing judicial review proceedings in which she was herself a party.”
WLR Daily, 9th August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
High Court (Chancery Division)
Brown v Stephenson [2013] EWHC 2531 (Ch) (23 August 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2013] EWHC 2573 (Admin) (28 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Ahmed v R [2013] EWCA Crim 1393 (31 July 2013)
Martin, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1420 (31 July 2013)
Banfield & Anor, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 1394 (31 July 2013)
Regan, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1465 (31 July 2013)
O’Leary v R [2013] EWCA Crim 1371 (31 July 2013)
Mateta & Ors, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 1372 (30 July 2013)
Chapman, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1370 (29 July 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Citicorp Trustee Company Ltd v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2013] EWHC 2608 (Ch) (23 August 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Jackson v Thompsons Solicitors (A Firm) & Ors [2013] EWHC 2578 (QB) (23 August 2013
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Hall -Chung, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 3429 (26 July 2007)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Data Power Systems Ltd & Ors v Safehosts (London) Ltd & Anor [2013] EWHC 2479 (Ch) (17 May 2013)
High Court (Family Division)
Jones, Re (Alleged Contempt of Court) [2013] EWHC 2579 (Fam) (21 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Hall, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 1450 (26 July 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Lee v Lasrado [2013] EWHC 2302 (QB) (26 July 2013)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
“The judge who had heard a substantive application would almost always be the right judge to deal with consequential issues as to costs, even if he had made findings adverse to a party in the course of reaching his conclusion. However, exceptional circumstances might arise where there was apparent bias stemming from the facts of the case which meant that the judge should have recused himself from dealing with the issue of costs.”
WLR Daily, 14th August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Heis & Ors v Attestor Value Master Fund LP & Anor [2013] EWHC 2556 (Ch) (16 August 2013)
High Court (Family Division)
A NHS Trust v DE [2013] EWHC 2562 (Fam) (16 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
High Court (Family Division)
M v M & Ors [2013] EWHC 2534 (Fam) (14 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Hellard (Trustee In Bankruptcy) v Kapoor [2013] EWHC 2204 (Ch) (25 July 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Truro City Council v Cornwall City Council [2013] EWHC 2525 (Admin) (13 August 2013)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Noemalife SPA v Infinitt UK Ltd [2013] EWHC 2376 (TCC) (14 August 2013)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Times Newspapers Ltd v McNamara [2013] EWHC B12 (Comm) (13 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
“Joint liquidators of a company were not data controllers within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998 in respect of data processed by the company prior to its liquidation.”
WLR Daily, 8th August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Regina (Nash) v Barnet London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1004; [2013] WLR (D) 335
“A local authority’s duty to consult under section 3(2) of the Local Government Act 1999 arose at a formative stage of the relevant process when the authority made arrangements to secure continuous improvement in the way in which its functions were exercised within section 3(1) of the Act. For the purposes of CPR r 54.5, a judicial review claim challenging the authority’s lack of consultation had to be brought within three months of the date when the grounds to make the claim had first arisen. That was the date the defendant authority had taken the decision to enter the procurement process for outsourcing, and since the claim had not been issued until the decision to enter into the contracts had been taken, it was out of time.”
WLR Daily, 2nd August 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Ahmad v Secret Garden (Cheshire) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1005 (06 August 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Thomas Cook Tour Operations Ltd & Anor v Louis Hotels SA [2013] EWHC 2469 (QB) (09 August 2013)
N and N v London Borough of Newham & Anor [2013] EWHC 2475 (Admin) (09 August 2013)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Turbill & Anor, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1422 (12 July 2013)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd, Re [2013] EWHC 2485 (Ch) (08 August 2013)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Foster & Anor v Action Aviation Ltd [2013] EWHC 2439 (Comm) (08 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Cart v Cart [2013] EWCA Civ 1006 (07 August 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Saha v Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine [2013] EWHC 2438 (QB) (07 August 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Caterpillar (NI) Ltd v John Holt & Company (Liverpool) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 779 (13 June 2013)
Stuart v London City Airport Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 973 (31 July 2013)
Vince v Wyatt [2013] EWCA Civ 934 (13 June 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Poole v Wright (t/a Simon Wright Racing Development) & Ors [2013] EWHC 2375 (QB) (05 August 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Newcombe v Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) [2013] EWHC 2160 (Admin) (20 June 2013)
High Court (Family Division)
London Borough of Camden v Caratt & Ors [2013] EWHC 2336 (Fam) (31 July 2013)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Oakapple Homes (Glossop) Ltd v DTR (2009) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 2394 (TCC) (31 July 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
© Inner Temple Library 2025