Court fee can be claimed from defendants despite exemption – Litigation Futures

Posted January 28th, 2020 in civil procedure rules, costs, fees, news, part 36 offers by tracey

‘There are “strong public policy grounds” for allowing fee-exempt claimants to claim their court fees from defendants rather than the taxpayer, a judge has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 28th January 2020

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Part 36 offers made exclusive of interest not valid, Court of Appeal rules – Local Government Lawyer

Posted January 21st, 2020 in civil procedure rules, costs, interest, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘It is not possible to make a valid Part 36 offer exclusive of interest either generally or in the context of detailed assessment proceedings, the Court of Appeal has ruled in a case involving a local authority.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 20th January 2020

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Part 36 offers cannot exclude interest to be valid – Litigation Futures

Posted December 20th, 2019 in appeals, civil procedure rules, costs, interest, news, part 36 offers by tracey

‘Part 36 offers which specifically exclude interest are not valid, the Court of Appeal has ruled – but one of the judges said this should be reconsidered.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 19th December 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Part 36 Offers Explained – Becket Chambers

Posted November 20th, 2019 in news, part 36 offers by sally

‘This article explains the key points about Part 36 offers and provides top tips for avoiding common pitfalls.’

Full Story

Becket Chambers, 14th November 2019

Source: becket-chambers.co.uk

CA: Part 36 offer did not contract out of fixed costs – Litigation Futures

Posted November 20th, 2019 in costs, news, part 36 offers, road traffic by sally

‘A defendant who settles a claim that leaves the RTA protocol with a part 36 offer including the usual wording about paying costs on the standard basis is not contracting out of fixed costs, the Court of Appeal has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 19th November 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Appeal court re-establishes fixed costs for claim headed to multi-track – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 20th, 2019 in costs, news, part 36 offers, road traffic by sally

‘The Court of Appeal has ruled that claimant solicitors should settle for fixed costs in a ruling that could send shivers through the claims sector.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 19th November 2019

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Defendant pays an extra £65,000 after fractional Part 36 defeat – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 15th, 2019 in contracts, costs, damages, interest, news, part 36 offers by tracey

‘A losing party has been ordered to pay an extra £65,000 after declining to settle a case over a difference amounting to less than £5,000.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 15th November 2019

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Settling for nil damages can still be a genuine Part 36 offer – MR v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1970 QB – Zenith PI

Posted September 6th, 2019 in assault, costs, damages, false imprisonment, harassment, news, part 36 offers, police by tracey

‘The appellant was arrested on suspicion of harassment but was later released without charge, after police had taken fingerprints and DNA samples. The appellant issued a claim for false imprisonment and assault.’

Full Story

Zenith PI, 5th September 2019

Source: zenithpi.wordpress.com

Offer to settle for no damages was valid under part 36 – Litigation Futures

‘An offer to settle a case for no damages but an admission of liability was a valid part 36 offer and it was not unjust to apply the usual consequences of beating an offer when the claimant won at trial, the High Court has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 28th August 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Part 36 consequences “are severable”, High Court rules – Litigation Futures

Posted June 26th, 2019 in civil procedure rules, costs, judges, jurisdiction, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘The court can decide it is unjust to award some, but not all, of the consequences of beating a part 36 offer, a High Court judge has ruled.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 25th June 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Judge refuses uplift after successful part 36 offer on hourly rates – Litigation Futures

Posted May 29th, 2019 in costs, news, part 36 offers by tracey

‘A judge has refused to award claimants an uplift on their costs after beating a part 36 offer restricted just to the hourly rates in dispute.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 29th May 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Part 36 offer that included unpleaded counterclaim ruled valid – Litigation Futures

Posted May 8th, 2019 in appeals, construction industry, delay, interest, negligence, news, part 36 offers by tracey

‘A part 36 offer made by a defendant in respect of both a claim and a proposed counterclaim which has yet to be pleaded is valid, the Court of Appeal has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 7th May 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Fixed fees can apply to claim which settled for £42k, court rules – Law Society’s Gazette

‘The courts have made clear they will be prepared to apply fixed costs to cases which have long since breached the £25,000 limit. Two judgments that have emerged over the past week show examples of judges considering fixed recoverable costs where the personal injury claims had exited the pre-action protocol.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 24th April 2019

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

High Court dispenses with electronic bill – Litigation Futures

Posted April 3rd, 2019 in budgets, costs, damages, electronic filing, negligence, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘A High Court judge has relieved a claimant who won a trial in January from having to produce an electronic bill for the work undertaken since 6 April 2018.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 2nd April 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

DDJ “should not have interfered” with parties’ costs agreement – Litigation Futures

Posted January 14th, 2019 in accidents, appeals, consent orders, costs, news, part 36 offers, road traffic by tracey

‘A deputy district judge’s decision to vary a consent order for costs on the standard basis to apply fixed costs to a claim that started in the portal has been overturned.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 14th January 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Appeal refused over claimant who issued just to recover costs – Litigation Futures

Posted January 10th, 2019 in appeals, costs, news, part 36 offers, pre-action conduct by sally

‘The Court of Appeal has refused permission to appeal a High Court decision that found a claimant was entitled to issue his claim solely in pursuit of costs.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 9th January 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Part 36 penalties “severable”, says judge as she refuses 10% uplift – Litigation Futures

Posted January 7th, 2019 in costs, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘The consequences of beating a part 36 offer are “severable” and each should be assessed against the test of whether it would be unjust to award them, a judge has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 2nd January 2019

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Court cannot order costs on account after part 36 acceptance – Litigation Futures

Posted November 14th, 2018 in civil procedure rules, costs, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘The courts have no power to order the payment of costs on account after a part 36 offer is accepted, the High Court has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 14th November 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Defendants pay heavy price for refusing to discuss costs – Law Society’s Gazette

‘Defendants in a professional negligence claim who rejected the chance to settle costs have been left nursing a bill at least three times higher than it might have been.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 2nd November 2018

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

High Court backs claimant who issued just to recover costs – Litigation Futures

Posted November 2nd, 2018 in abuse of process, civil procedure rules, costs, negligence, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘A claimant was entitled to issue his claim solely in pursuit of costs where the defendant “acted unfairly” by trying to settle pre-action but refusing to pay any costs, the High Court has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 1st November 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com