‘Owning a £2m apartment doesn’t mean I’m rich…’: Court dismisses banker’s claim that he cannot afford to pay ex-wife’s legal fees – The Independent

Posted October 22nd, 2013 in appeals, costs, divorce, news by tracey

“The spending power of former City trader, Yan Assoun, 43, was described by a family judge three months ago as ‘beyond the wildest dreams’ of his estranged wife. But with his bitter divorce battle now in the Appeal Court, he insisted: ‘I don’t have any money’.”

Full story

The Independent, 22nd October 2013

Source: www.independent.co.uk

High Court dismisses challenge to PCO in Richard III burial case – Litigation Futures

“The High Court has comprehensively rejected the government’s bid to overturn the grant of a protective costs order (PCO) in favour of campaigners for the reburial of King Richard III in York.”

Full story

Litigation Futures, 18th October 2013

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Legal claims ‘could paralyse’ armed forces – BBC News

“A ‘sustained legal assault’ on British forces could have ‘catastrophic consequences’ for the safety of the nation, an influential right-leaning think tank has warned.”

Full story

BBC News, 18th October 2013

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

High Court refuses to delay high street court battle with MasterCard – The Lawyer

“An attempt by MasterCard to avoid a multi-billion damages claim from a dozen retailers because the monthly due diligence costs charged by its lawyers at Jones Day could be as much as £700,000 has been rejected by the High Court.”

Full story

The Lawyer, 16th October 2013

Source: www.thelawyer.com

High Court: winning party should not be kept to out-of-date approved budget – Litigation Futures

Posted October 16th, 2013 in budgets, claims management, costs, news by sally

“The High Court has rejected a bid to limit a winning party’s costs to a previously approved budget where a substantially revised one was seen by the court and other party but not dealt with at the pre-trial review (PTR).”

Full story

Litigation Futures, 16th October 2013

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Aarhus, A-G Kokott’s opinion, and the PCO reciprocal cap – UK Human Rights Blog

“Forgive me for returning to this case, but it raises all sorts of questions. On the face of it, it concerns 2 specific environmental directives, but it has implications for costs generally in environmental cases.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 15th October 2013

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Libel tourism at an end, say lawyers following high court rulings – The Guardian

“Lawyers have heralded the death of so-called libel tourism after the high court threw out two cases brought by wealthy foreigners over allegations published overseas.”

Full story

The Guardian, 15th October 2013

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

BSB issues statement after Twitter confusion over judicial review costs – The Lawyer

“The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has issued a statement about the costs of a judicial review into the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) following widespread outrage and confusion on Twitter.”

Full story

The Lawyer, 11th October 2013

Source: www.thelawyer.com

Related link: Bar Standards Board Statement on costs and the judicial review of QASA

Six years, three judges, £350,000 in costs to the taxpayer… and no change: Judge hits out at ‘astonishing’ cost of Court of Protection case – The Independent

“A High Court Judge has hit out at the ‘astonishing’ cost of a six year legal battle in the Court of Protection which ended today after all parties agreed a woman should stay in care.”

Full story

The Independent, 11th October 2013

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Senior Costs Judge lays down marker by slashing ATE premium in PPI case – Litigation Futures

Posted October 11th, 2013 in costs, insurance, news, proportionality by sally

“The Senior Costs Judge has slashed the after-the-event (ATE) premium claimed in a payment protection insurance (PPI) case, giving hope to defendants currently facing huge bills for mis-selling.”

Full story

Litigation Futures, 10th October 2013

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

QASA claimants granted costs cap – but at 10 times the level they wanted – Legal Futures

“The High Court has capped the costs exposure of the four barristers bringing a judicial review against the Legal Services Board (LSB) over the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) – but at a level 10 times the one they had proposed.”

Full story

Legal Futures. 10th October 2013

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

High Court grants injunction to losing bidder over £1bn waste contract award – Local Government Lawyer

“A High Court judge has granted an energy company an injunction preventing a waste authority from entering into a £1bn+ resource recovery contract (RRC) with a rival business.”

Full story

Local Government Lawyer, 8th October 2013

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Parties to civil litigation need more guidance on costs, says expert, as High Court declines to approve “disproportionate” budgets – OUT-LAW.com

“Parties to litigation in the civil courts need more guidance about what constitutes an ‘appropriate’ costs budget and the consequences of not meeting the requirements of the new costs management regime, an expert has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 8th October 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Why Mrs Litvinenko did not get her PCO – but what if it had been an environmental claim? – UK Human Rights Blog

“An extraordinary story which would have raised our eyebrows at its implausibility had it come from our spy novelists. In late 2006, Alexander Litvinenko was murdered by polonium-210 given to him in London. He was an ex-Russian Federation FSB agent, but by then was a UK citizen. He had accused Putin of the murder of the journalist Anna Politovskaya. He may or may not have been working for MI6 at the time of his death. The prime suspects for the killing are in Russia, not willing to help the UK with its inquiries. But rightly, in one form or another, we want to know what really happened.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 9th October 2013

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

High Court gives green light to QASA judicial review – Legal Futures

“Criminal barristers were yesterday given permission to pursue their judicial review against the Legal Services Board over the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA).”

Full story

Legal Futures, 8th October 2013

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Anti-drones protesters who broke into RAF base are praised by judge – The Guardian

Posted October 8th, 2013 in appeals, complaints, costs, criminal damage, news by sally

“Six protesters who broke into RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire, home of Britain’s first unmanned drones base, were described by a judge at their trial on Monday as ‘dutiful people’. He said it was only with a ‘heavy heart’ that he found them guilty of criminal damage to the base.”

Full story

The Guardian, 7th October 2013

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Commuters could be in line for savings following court case – Daily Telegraph

Posted October 8th, 2013 in consumer protection, costs, news, railways by sally

“A commuter’s court victory could see hundreds of passengers demanding cheaper season tickets as train operators move to plug a ‘loophole’ which he exploited.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 8th October 2013

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Claimant and defendant lawyers cross swords over mesothelioma reform – Litigation Futures

Posted October 7th, 2013 in consultations, costs, damages, legal aid, news, personal injuries by sally

“The low costs risk for claimants making mesothelioma claims means they should not longer benefit from an exemption from the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), a leading defendant law firm has argued.”

Full story

Litigation Futures, 7th October 2013

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Mousa – a costly costs quirk – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted October 4th, 2013 in costs, legal aid, news by sally

“In the substantive judgment (see Adam Wagner’s post on the order), the Divisional Court decided two main issues, one relating to the independence of the Iraq Historic Allegations Team, and one relating to the extent to which an inquiry conducted through IHAT complied with Article 2 of the ECHR. The Secretary of State succeeded on the first issue, whereas the claimant succeeded substantially on the second issue relating to the need for a different form of inquiry. Hence there was no overall winner; the Secretary of State won on the first issue and the claimant succeeded substantially on the second issue. But more time was spent on the first issue.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 3rd October 2013

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

High Court judge expressly declines to approve “disproportionate” costs budgets – Litigation Futures

Posted October 4th, 2013 in budgets, construction industry, costs, negligence, news, proportionality by sally

“A High Court judge has expressly declined to approve the costs budget of both sides of a construction dispute on the grounds that they were ‘disproportionate and unreasonable’.”

Full story

Litigation Futures, 4th October 2013

Source: www.litigationfutures.com