Category: jurisdiction

In re Press Association – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in anonymity, appeals, contempt of court, disclosure, jurisdiction, law reports, media, privacy, public interest, rape by sally

In re Press Association [2012] EWCA Crim 2434; [2012] WLR (D) 343

“The court did not have the power under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 nor under section 1(2) of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 to make an order anonymising the name of a defendant. It was for those responsible for decisions relating to publication to ensure that the provisions which protected the public identification of a complainant in sexual cases were obeyed and they did so, not because there were enjoined to do so by judicial order, but because it was a statutory requirement.”

WLR Daily, 21st November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in EC law, insolvency, jurisdiction, law reports, winding up by sally

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo (Case C-116/11); [2012] WLR (D) 340

“On the proper interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000, it was for the national law of the member state in which insolvency proceedings had been opened to determine at which moment the closure of those proceedings occurred. Where proceedings had a protective purpose, it was permissible to open secondary insolvency proceedings in the member state in which the debtor had an establishment. The court before which an application to have secondary insolvency proceedings opened had been made, could not examine the insolvency of a debtor against which main proceedings had been opened in another member state, even where the latter proceedings had a protective purpose.”

WLR Daily, 22nd November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Shagroon v Sharbatly – WLR Daily

Posted November 23rd, 2012 in divorce, financial provision, foreign jurisdictions, jurisdiction, law reports, polygamy by sally

Shagroon v Sharbatly: [2012] EWCA Civ 1507;   [2012] WLR (D)  337

“An English court would not recognise an overseas divorce, even if it was recognised by the country where the divorce had taken place, if the marriage performed between the parties was not recognised or recognisable in English law within the meaning of the Marriage Acts 1949 to 1986. Therefore, an English court had no jurisdiction to entertain a financial relief claim made under section 12 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 by a party to such a marriage.”

WLR Daily, 21st November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

 

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted November 21st, 2012 in compensation, EC law, enforcement, insurance, jurisdiction, law reports, transport by sally

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH (Case C-456/11); [2012] WLR (D) 329

“On the proper interpretation of articles 32 and 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p 1), the court of a member state in which recognition was sought of a judgment by which a court of another member state had declined jurisdiction on the basis of a jurisdiction clause was bound by the finding—declaring the action inadmissible—regarding the validity of that judgment.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

UK continues to oppose new single EU data protection law regime – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 14th, 2012 in data protection, EC law, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The UK, together with a number of other EU member states, is still opposed to the creation of a new singularly applicable data protection regime across the trading bloc, according to a new report.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 13th November 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

R (Nirula) v First-tier Tribunal (Asylum and Immigration Chamber) – WLR Daily

Posted November 14th, 2012 in appeals, human rights, immigration, jurisdiction, law reports, tribunals by sally

R (Nirula) v First-tier Tribunal (Asylum and Immigration Chamber) [2012] EWCA Civ 1436; [2012] WLR (D) 318

“A person may not appeal against an immigration decision from within the United Kingdom in reliance on section 92(4)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 unless he made a human rights claim or an asylum claim to the Secretary of State before instituting the appeal; where the claim is made for the first time in the notice of appeal, it is open to the First-tier Tribunal itself to take the jurisdictional point.”

WLR Daily, 8th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Database supported by UK servers means High Court can rule over alleged claims of infringement, says judge – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 13th, 2012 in copyright, database right, EC law, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The High Court will determine whether a Dutch company, its managing director and two employees are liable for infringements of database rights and copyright as well as a breach of confidence after rejecting claims that the case should be heard in the Dutch courts.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 12th November 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

Supreme Court to rule on a soldier’s right to life – The Independent

Posted November 12th, 2012 in armed forces, human rights, jurisdiction, news, Supreme Court by sally

“Whether a soldier on the battlefield has the right to life is to be debated by the highest court in the UK in a landmark case that is likely to have major ramifications for the armed forces, The Independent has learned.”

Full story

The Independent, 10th November 2012

Source: www.independent.co.uk

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov – WLR Daily

Posted November 9th, 2012 in committals, contempt of court, disclosure, human rights, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov: [2012] EWCA Civ 1411;   [2012] WLR (D)  308

“The court had jurisdiction to make an order barring a defendant, who had absconded following his committal for contempt, from defending the claims against him unless within a stated period he both surrendered to custody and made proper disclosure of all his assets and dealings with them.”

WLR Daily, 6th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Defence and another (JUSTICE intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted November 1st, 2012 in appeals, detention, habeas corpus, jurisdiction, law reports, rendition, Supreme Court, terrorism, treaties by sally

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Defence and another (JUSTICE intervening) [2012] UKSC 48; [2012] WLR (D) 301

“Where, on an application for a writ of habeas corpus, the court was uncertain whether the respondents had sufficient control of the applicant to be able to produce him, it could properly issue the writ so that on the return that question could be determined with fuller knowledge.”

WLR Daily, 31st October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Prisoners’ votes: what’s the government up to? And are they missing a trick? – Head of Legal

Posted October 31st, 2012 in bills, elections, human rights, jurisdiction, news, parliament, prisons by sally

“It’s well known that the government faces a problem when it comes to prisoners’ votes.”

Full story

Head of Legal, 30th October 2012

Source: www.headoflegal.com

Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11) – WLR Daily

Posted October 29th, 2012 in competition, conflict of laws, EC law, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11); [2012] WLR (D) 292

“An action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict fell within the scope of article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L12, p 1).”

WLR Daily, 25th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Last quango in Paris? Why the fate of the EHRC is important for all of us – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted October 29th, 2012 in bills, human rights, jurisdiction, news by sally

“In its foreign policy, the UK Government is a keen advocate of national human rights institutions (NHRI’s). The Brighton Declaration, drafted by the UK, encourages Council of Europe States to consider ‘the establishment, if they have not already done so, of an independent National Human Rights Institution’. In June 2012 the UK signed a UN General Assembly resolution ‘Reaffirming the important role that such national institutions play and will continue to play.’”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 28th October 2012

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Governor & Company of the Bank of Ireland and another v Colliers International UK plc (in administration) and others – WLR Daily

Posted October 26th, 2012 in administrators, insolvency, jurisdiction, law reports, retrospectivity by sally

Governor & Company of the Bank of Ireland and another v Colliers International UK plc (in administration) and others: [2012] EWHC 2942 (Ch);   [2012] WLR (D)  288

“The court had jurisdiction under paragraph 43(6) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 to give permission retrospectively to institute legal proceedings against a company in administration.”

WLR daily, 24th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Government of the United States of America v Nolan (Case C-583/10) – WLR Daily

Posted October 23rd, 2012 in armed forces, EC law, jurisdiction, law reports, recusal, redundancy by sally

Government of the United States of America v Nolan (Case C-583/10); [2012] WLR (D) 280

“Since civilian employees at a military base were covered by the exemption from the provisions of Council Directive 98/59/EC provided by article 1(2)(b), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not have jurisdiction, on a reference in proceedings concerning dismissals resulting from a strategic decision concerning the closure of a military base, to give an interpretation of the provisions of that Directove, even though domestic law implemented it.”

WLR Daily, 18th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania v Bucnys; Sakalis v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania; Lavrov v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Estonia – WLR Daily

Posted October 18th, 2012 in extradition, jurisdiction, law reports, warrants by sally

Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania v Bucnys; Sakalis v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania; Lavrov v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Estonia [2012] EWHC 2771 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 276

“A certificate issued by the Serious Organised Crime Agency under section 2(7)(8) of the Extradition Act 2003 that a person or body that had issued a European arrest warrant had the function of issuing such warrants in the relevant territory was not conclusive that the person or body was a “judicial authority” for the purposes of either article 6 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states or section 2(2) of the 2003 Act.”

WLR Daily, 12th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Gary McKinnon: a case of double standards? – The Guardian

Posted October 18th, 2012 in autism, computer crime, extradition, jurisdiction, news, treaties by sally

“The home secretary’s decision not to extradite the Crouch End Asperger’s sufferer has caused others to raise questions.”

Full story

The Guardian, 17th October 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Statement by Home Secretary on extradition – Home Office

Posted October 17th, 2012 in EC law, extradition, health, human rights, jurisdiction, speeches, warrants by sally

“Statement by Home Secretary Theresa May on extradition made on 16 October 2012.”

Full statement

Home Office, 16th October 2012

Source: www.homeoffice.gov.uk

Price v Cheshire East Borough Council – WLR daily

Posted October 16th, 2012 in jurisdiction, law reports, sentencing, trials by sally

Price v Cheshire East Borough Council: [2012] WLR (D)  275

“It was wrong in law, when determining mode of trial, for justices to directly apply Sentencing Council guidelines for a different offence to that faced by the defendant unless the sentencing guidelines were directly analogous or if there was a similar level of seriousness.”

WLR Daily, 11th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Criminal law opt-out – our justice system deserves better – Halsbury’s Law Exchange

Posted October 15th, 2012 in criminal justice, EC law, jurisdiction, news, veto, victims, warrants by sally

“Recently there has been concern in the legal world and media about the potential loss of EU criminal justice and judicial cooperation measures which are incorporated into English law.”

Full story

Halsbury’s Law Exchange, 12th October 2012

Source: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk