Category: jurisdiction

Pensions Ombudsman v EMC Europe Ltd and others – WLR Daily

Posted December 20th, 2012 in compromise, jurisdiction, law reports, ombudsmen, pensions, setting aside, third parties, trusts by tracey

Pensions Ombudsman v EMC Europe Ltd and others: [2012] EWHC 3508 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 382

“The Pensions Ombudsman had no jurisdiction to entertain a complaint by a scheme member to set aside a compromise agreement where successful determination of the complaint would adversely affect the rights of the parent company in circumstances where it was a necessary party to any claim to set aside the agreement but was not subject to the ombudsman’s jurisdiction.”

WLR Daily, 14th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Hone and others – WLR Daily

Posted December 14th, 2012 in amendments, judgments, jurisdiction, law reports by tracey

Abbey Forwarding Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Hone and others: [2012] EWHC 3525 (Ch);   [2012] WLR (D)  375

“There was no general bar in principle to the award of general damages for emotional distress where a freezing order was wrongly obtained but any such award would be sensitive to the facts of a particular case.”

WLR Daily, 11th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Court of Protection Update – Family Law Week

Posted December 7th, 2012 in Court of Protection, joinder, jurisdiction, medical treatment, news by sally

“Sally Bradley and Michael Edwards, Barristers, both of 4 Paper Buildings consider recent developments in the Court of Protection.”

Full story

Family Law Week, 6th December 2012

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

In re K (Children) (Direction to Investigate: Jurisdiction) – WLR Daily

Posted December 5th, 2012 in care orders, family courts, jurisdiction, law reports, local government by sally

In re K (Children) (Direction to Investigate: Jurisdiction) [2012] EWCA Civ 1549; [2012] WLR (D) 364

“In family proceedings the court had jurisdiction to make more than one order under section 37 of the Children Act 1989 directing a local authority to investigate a child’s circumstances and consider issuing care proceedings. Where a judge was satisfied that the local authority either had not complied with the initial section 37 direction or had conducted an investigation which failed to a significant degree to engage with the court’s concerns, the court could extend or renew its section 37 direction.”

WLR Daily, 29th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Another reason to avoid the CAT – Emerson in the Court of Appeal – Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers

Posted December 4th, 2012 in appeals, competition, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The famous Victorian cricketer WG Grace is reputed once to have offered the following advice:

‘When you win the toss – bat. If you are in doubt, think about it, then bat. If you have very big doubts, consult a colleague – then bat.’

The recent Emerson decision [2012] EWCA Civ 1559 is another illustration that bringing a follow on claim in the CAT rather than in the High Court is the law’s equivalent of choosing to bowl.”

Full story

Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers, 4th December 2012

Source: www.competitionbulletin.com

The inherent jurisdiction: where are we now? – Thirty Nine Essex Street

Posted December 4th, 2012 in jurisdiction, mental health, news by sally

“That very significant vestiges of the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relief have survived the implementation of the MCA 2005 is now clear. However, what is very much less clear is precisely: (1) how far the inherent jurisdiction has survived; and (2) how the High Court can or should exercise its powers under the inherent jurisdiction in respect of those who can only be afforded protection by way of its exercise. Cases decided since the beginning of the year have perhaps made the answers less rather than more clear, and this note seeks to draw together some of the threads, as much to provoke discussion as to offer solutions. It concludes with a brief discussion of the prospects for statutory reform in the area in the shape of the draft Care and Support Bill.”

Full story (PDF)

Thirty Nine Essex Street, December 2012

Source: www.39essex.com

Appleyard v Wewelwala – WLR Daily

Posted November 27th, 2012 in bankruptcy, jurisdiction, law reports, remuneration, trustees in bankruptcy by sally

Appleyard v Wewelwala [2012] EWHC 3302 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 345

“The court’s inherent jurisdiction to direct payment of the trustee in bankruptcy’s expenses extended to cases where the bankruptcy order was set aside on appeal. A trustee who had acted properly and innocently of any wrongdoing could expect to obtain payment of his reasonable expenses”

WLR Daily, 23rd November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Chief Justice of the Cayman Islands v Governor of the Cayman Islands and another – WLR Daily

Posted November 27th, 2012 in jurisdiction, law reports, Privy Council by sally

Chief Justice of the Cayman Islands v Governor of the Cayman Islands and another [2012] UKPC 39; [2012] WLR (D) 344

“It would be inappropriate for the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council substantively to consider issues raised in a petition referred by Her Majesty under section 4 of the Judicial Committee Act 1833, when those issues could be raised by way of ordinary proceedings in the first instance courts of the territory in which the issues arose.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

In re Press Association – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in anonymity, appeals, contempt of court, disclosure, jurisdiction, law reports, media, privacy, public interest, rape by sally

In re Press Association [2012] EWCA Crim 2434; [2012] WLR (D) 343

“The court did not have the power under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 nor under section 1(2) of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 to make an order anonymising the name of a defendant. It was for those responsible for decisions relating to publication to ensure that the provisions which protected the public identification of a complainant in sexual cases were obeyed and they did so, not because there were enjoined to do so by judicial order, but because it was a statutory requirement.”

WLR Daily, 21st November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in EC law, insolvency, jurisdiction, law reports, winding up by sally

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo (Case C-116/11); [2012] WLR (D) 340

“On the proper interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000, it was for the national law of the member state in which insolvency proceedings had been opened to determine at which moment the closure of those proceedings occurred. Where proceedings had a protective purpose, it was permissible to open secondary insolvency proceedings in the member state in which the debtor had an establishment. The court before which an application to have secondary insolvency proceedings opened had been made, could not examine the insolvency of a debtor against which main proceedings had been opened in another member state, even where the latter proceedings had a protective purpose.”

WLR Daily, 22nd November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Shagroon v Sharbatly – WLR Daily

Posted November 23rd, 2012 in divorce, financial provision, foreign jurisdictions, jurisdiction, law reports, polygamy by tracey

Shagroon v Sharbatly: [2012] EWCA Civ 1507;   [2012] WLR (D)  337

“An English court would not recognise an overseas divorce, even if it was recognised by the country where the divorce had taken place, if the marriage performed between the parties was not recognised or recognisable in English law within the meaning of the Marriage Acts 1949 to 1986. Therefore, an English court had no jurisdiction to entertain a financial relief claim made under section 12 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 by a party to such a marriage.”

WLR Daily, 21st November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

 

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted November 21st, 2012 in compensation, EC law, enforcement, insurance, jurisdiction, law reports, transport by sally

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH (Case C-456/11); [2012] WLR (D) 329

“On the proper interpretation of articles 32 and 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p 1), the court of a member state in which recognition was sought of a judgment by which a court of another member state had declined jurisdiction on the basis of a jurisdiction clause was bound by the finding—declaring the action inadmissible—regarding the validity of that judgment.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

UK continues to oppose new single EU data protection law regime – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 14th, 2012 in data protection, EC law, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The UK, together with a number of other EU member states, is still opposed to the creation of a new singularly applicable data protection regime across the trading bloc, according to a new report.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 13th November 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

R (Nirula) v First-tier Tribunal (Asylum and Immigration Chamber) – WLR Daily

Posted November 14th, 2012 in appeals, human rights, immigration, jurisdiction, law reports, tribunals by sally

R (Nirula) v First-tier Tribunal (Asylum and Immigration Chamber) [2012] EWCA Civ 1436; [2012] WLR (D) 318

“A person may not appeal against an immigration decision from within the United Kingdom in reliance on section 92(4)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 unless he made a human rights claim or an asylum claim to the Secretary of State before instituting the appeal; where the claim is made for the first time in the notice of appeal, it is open to the First-tier Tribunal itself to take the jurisdictional point.”

WLR Daily, 8th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Database supported by UK servers means High Court can rule over alleged claims of infringement, says judge – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 13th, 2012 in copyright, database right, EC law, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The High Court will determine whether a Dutch company, its managing director and two employees are liable for infringements of database rights and copyright as well as a breach of confidence after rejecting claims that the case should be heard in the Dutch courts.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 12th November 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

Supreme Court to rule on a soldier’s right to life – The Independent

Posted November 12th, 2012 in armed forces, human rights, jurisdiction, news, Supreme Court by sally

“Whether a soldier on the battlefield has the right to life is to be debated by the highest court in the UK in a landmark case that is likely to have major ramifications for the armed forces, The Independent has learned.”

Full story

The Independent, 10th November 2012

Source: www.independent.co.uk

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov – WLR Daily

Posted November 9th, 2012 in committals, contempt of court, disclosure, human rights, jurisdiction, law reports by tracey

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov: [2012] EWCA Civ 1411;   [2012] WLR (D)  308

“The court had jurisdiction to make an order barring a defendant, who had absconded following his committal for contempt, from defending the claims against him unless within a stated period he both surrendered to custody and made proper disclosure of all his assets and dealings with them.”

WLR Daily, 6th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Defence and another (JUSTICE intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted November 1st, 2012 in appeals, detention, habeas corpus, jurisdiction, law reports, rendition, Supreme Court, terrorism, treaties by sally

Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Defence and another (JUSTICE intervening) [2012] UKSC 48; [2012] WLR (D) 301

“Where, on an application for a writ of habeas corpus, the court was uncertain whether the respondents had sufficient control of the applicant to be able to produce him, it could properly issue the writ so that on the return that question could be determined with fuller knowledge.”

WLR Daily, 31st October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Prisoners’ votes: what’s the government up to? And are they missing a trick? – Head of Legal

Posted October 31st, 2012 in bills, elections, human rights, jurisdiction, news, parliament, prisons by sally

“It’s well known that the government faces a problem when it comes to prisoners’ votes.”

Full story

Head of Legal, 30th October 2012

Source: www.headoflegal.com

Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11) – WLR Daily

Posted October 29th, 2012 in competition, conflict of laws, EC law, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11); [2012] WLR (D) 292

“An action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict fell within the scope of article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L12, p 1).”

WLR Daily, 25th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk