Category: constitutional law

In defence of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act – UCL Constitution Unit

Posted September 13th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, inquiries, news, parliament, prerogative powers, royal prerogative by tracey

‘The Fixed-term Parliaments Act has come in for a lot of criticism of late, but is it as badly designed and drafted as some commentators would have us believe? The House of Lords Constitution Committee recently commenced an inquiry into the effectiveness of the Act to seek answers to this question. Robert Hazell and Nabila Roukhamieh-McKinna explain the background to the inquiry, and some of the key issues being addressed.’

Full Story

UCL Constitution Unit , 23rd September 2019

Source: constitution-unit.com

Brexit: Scottish judges rule Parliament suspension is unlawful – BBC News

Posted September 12th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, news, parliament, prerogative powers, royal prerogative, Scotland by tracey

‘Boris Johnson’s suspension of the UK Parliament is unlawful, Scotland’s highest civil court has ruled.’

Full Story

BBC News, 11th September 2019

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Brexit: Judge rejects parliament shutdown legal challenge – BBC News

Posted September 4th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, judicial review, ministers' powers and duties, news, parliament, prerogative powers, royal prerogative, Scotland by sally

‘A Scottish judge has rejected a bid to have Boris Johnson’s plan to shut down parliament ahead of Brexit declared illegal.’

Full Story

BBC News, 4th September 2019

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Article: The legal challenge to proroguing Parliament – what is happening in the Scottish Courts? – UKSC Blog

Posted September 3rd, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, judicial review, news, parliament, prerogative powers, prorogation, royal prerogative, Scotland, Supreme Court by sally

‘In this article, UKSC Blog editor, Emma Boffey, an associate at CMS based in Scotland, writes on the Scottish legal challenge to the proroguing of the UK Parliament: a case widely expected to head to the UK Supreme Court in the coming weeks.’

Full Story

UKSC Blog, 2nd September 2019

Source: ukscblog.com

Jacob Rowbottom: Political Purposes and the Prorogation of Parliament – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted September 3rd, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, news, parliament, prerogative powers, prorogation, royal prerogative by sally

‘While the prorogation of Parliament has generated political controversy, constitutional lawyers are asking whether the government acted legally in advising the Monarch. The legal challenges to the prorogation will face a number of hurdles. Even if the prerogative power is justiciable, there are difficult questions in identifying the specific legal issue. When writing about a potential challenge in June, Lord Pannick stated that one legal objection is that ‘the prime minister would be seeking to prorogue parliament for the purpose of avoiding parliamentary sovereignty on an issue of significant constitutional importance’. This post will explore a related line of argument, which focuses on proroguing Parliament as a means to avoid political accountability (so the argument does not rely on the language of sovereignty). The starting point in the line of argument is that the prorogation will to some degree hinder Parliament in whatever it wants to do in the period immediately prior to Britain exiting the EU. That goes beyond the potential to enact legislation or pass a motion of no confidence, and also includes the ordinary channels of political accountability and scrutiny of government.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 3rd September 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Prorogation: Constitutional Principle and Law, Fact and Causation – Oxford Human Rights Hub

Posted September 2nd, 2019 in brexit, causation, constitutional law, news, parliament, prerogative powers, prorogation, royal prerogative by sally

‘The Prime Minister’s recent announcement that Parliament would be prorogued, thereby severely curtailing the opportunity for parliamentary debate, raises important issues of constitutional principle and law, and also issues concerning fact and causation. They are examined in turn.’

Full Story

Oxford Human Rights Hub, 31st August 2019

Source: ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk

Playing Hardball with the Queen – Oxford Human Rights Hub

Posted September 2nd, 2019 in bills, brexit, constitutional law, Crown, news, parliament, prerogative powers by sally

‘The idea of constitutional hardball was introduced to the world by Mark Tushnet. The sport is played when political actors decide the stakes are so high that any lawful action is justified, no matter how constitutionally problematic: hardball stays within the confines of the law, but runs against the spirit, and sometimes the conventions, of the constitution.’

Full Story

Oxford Human Rights Hub, 31st August 2019

Source: ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk

Proroguing parliament sets a horrifying precedent. I’m going to court to stop it – Gina Miller – The Guardian

Posted August 30th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, judicial review, news, parliament, precedent, prerogative powers, prorogation, royal prerogative by sally

‘Other dictatorial moves may follow if Boris Johnson’s ruse is allowed to pass. The high court must listen to our case against it.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 29th August 2019

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parliament suspension: What was the Queen’s role? – BBC News

Posted August 30th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, news, parliament, prerogative powers, royal prerogative by sally

‘It is most unlikely we will ever get any authoritative insight into what the Queen thought about the prime minister’s request for her to suspend Parliament.’

Full Story

BBC News, 29th August 2019

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Parliament had failed on Brexit long before this prorogation – The Guardian

Posted August 30th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, EC law, news, parliament, prerogative powers, prorogation, referendums by sally

‘MPs had three years to come up with an alternative to no deal – and they failed.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 29th August 2019

Source: www.theguardian.com

Brexit: Gina Miller files for legal challenge to stop Boris Johnson’s ‘cynical and cowardly’ plan to prorogue parliament – The Independent

Posted August 29th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, judicial review, news, parliament, prorogation by tracey

‘Anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller has as filed an urgent application for a legal challenge to stop Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s “cynical and cowardly” plan to prorogue parliament.’

Full Story

The Independent, 29th August 2019

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Are there principles that trump democracy? The Reith Lectures, 2019: Lord Sumption’s Lecture and Responses – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted July 30th, 2019 in constitutional law, human rights, judges, news, rule of law by sally

‘Are there principles that trump democracy? This was one of a number of profound philosophical and legal questions addressed by former UK Supreme Court Justice Jonathan Sumption in his recent and controversial Reith Lectures, which addressed subjects such an law’s expanding empire, the challenges posed by human rights, and the advantage of an unwritten constitution.’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 29th July 2019

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

Mike Gordon: Privacy International, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Synthetic Constitution – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted June 26th, 2019 in appeals, constitutional law, investigatory powers, judges, judicial review, news, parliament, privacy, statutory interpretation, Supreme Court by sally

‘The case of R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal is the latest in a series of high profile judicial engagements with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. The case concerned the legal status of s.68(7) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, and in particular, whether this provision constituted a successful attempt to oust the jurisdiction of the High Court to hear challenges to the decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal by judicial review.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 26th June 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

To shut down parliament would be simple. But it would be an outrage – The Guardian

Posted June 13th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, Ireland, news, Northern Ireland, parliament, prerogative powers, royal prerogative by sally

‘The next prime minister will have the power to prevent MPs blocking a no-deal Brexit, though would he or she dare close the Commons for three months?’

Full Story

The Guardian, 13th June 2019

Source: www.theguardian.com

Sam Fowles: Can the Prime Minister Prorogue Parliament to Deliver a No Deal Brexit? – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted June 10th, 2019 in appeals, brexit, constitutional law, EC law, judicial review, news, parliament, prorogation, Supreme Court by sally

‘In recent days certain government backbenchers have proposed a new avenue to deliver a “no deal” Brexit.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 10th June 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Graham Gee and Chris McCorkindale: The Political Constitution at 40 – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted June 4th, 2019 in constitutional history, constitutional law, news by sally

‘The constitution ‘is no more and no less than what happens’. So wrote Professor John Griffith in the 1978 Chorley Lecture, ‘The Political Constitution’, which was later republished in the Modern Law Review in 1979. It was not the first time that Griffith dangled this tantalizing aphorism before his readers, but it was this lecture that saw it melt into the vocabulary of public law. It might seem trite to spotlight this aphorism from what is a rich and intricate lecture full of important insights as well as memorable phrases. However, as we see it, constitutional practice over the last three years —or, for that matter, the last three months, the last three weeks, or even the last three days—underscores the continuing relevance of Griffith’s insights into the complex and contingent nature of the relationship between law, politics and the constitution.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 3rd June 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Stephanie Reynolds: Brexit and the (Not Quite) Constitutionalised Status of EU Citizenship – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted April 24th, 2019 in brexit, citizenship, constitutional law, EC law, news by sally

‘Since its formal introduction in the Maastricht Treaty, EU citizenship has laid claim to a constitutional status. The Union Treaties – long described by the Court of Justice as the EU’s constitutional texts – explicitly confer the status of Union citizenship on all nationals of the Member States. The asserted significance of this was subsequently confirmed in the seminal Grzelczyk judgment, in which the Court famously declared that EU citizenship was ‘destined to be the fundamental status of nationals of the Member States’.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 24th April 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

David Howarth: Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views of the Constitution – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted April 11th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, ministers' powers and duties, news, parliament by sally

‘Lawyers like to make as much sense as possible of the material in front of them, transforming it, if they can, from a jumble of decisions and remarks into a coherent whole. For constitutional lawyers that habit of mind is both a blessing and a curse. It is a blessing because it causes lawyers to look for subtleties others miss (albeit sometimes subtleties they themselves create). It is a curse because when the material is generated by underlying mechanisms and ideas that fundamentally conflict, it leaves lawyers at a loss, or, worse, going round in circles.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 10th April 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Could ministerial advice to the Queen to prorogue Parliament or to refuse assent to a Parliamentary Bill be challenged in the courts? – Brexit Law

Posted April 9th, 2019 in bills, brexit, constitutional law, Crown, ministers' powers and duties, news, parliament, prorogation by sally

‘This post continues the debate that has arisen following recent Parliamentary efforts to seize the initiative from the Government to avoid a no-deal Brexit, in particular the Cooper- Letwin Bill, and certain proposals that have emerged by which it is suggested the Government could thwart these efforts.’

Full Story

Brexit Law, 8th April 2019

Source: brexit.law

Ewan McGaughey: What Is Needed in Our Constitution to Revoke Article 50? – UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted April 4th, 2019 in brexit, constitutional law, news, parliament by sally

‘Professors Gavin Phillipson and Alison Young have argued on this blog that an Act of Parliament is needed to revoke article 50. An alternative view is that, while an Act may be desirable, it is not necessary. This is still an important issue because on Wednesday 27th of March 2019, 184 votes in the House of Commons were cast in favour of revoking article 50 before ‘exit day’ if no agreement had been reached, 293 votes were cast against, and 164 MPs abstained. By contrast, 400 MPs voted against ‘no deal’. Mathematically the question of revocation remains in play, because in an emergency a positive majority of the Commons may emerge. Because an Act takes longer than executive action, the question of the legal mechanism to revoke article 50 must be scrutinised.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 4th April 2019

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org