EC law – Page 78 – Current Awareness

Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and others – WLR Daily

Posted January 7th, 2013 in copyright, EC law, interpretation, law reports, sport, telecommunications by sally

Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1708; [2012] WLR (D) 392

“Section 72(1)(c) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, as amended, which provided, inter alia, that the showing or playing in public of a broadcast to an audience who had not paid for admission to the place where the broadcast was to be seen or heard did not infringe any copyright in any film included in it, provided a defence to the act of communicating a film included in a broadcast to the public, which would otherwise be an act restricted by copyright under section 20 of the Act.”

WLR Daily, 20th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Abed El Karem El Kott and others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (ENSZ Menekültügyi Főbiztossága intervening) (Case C-364/11) – WLR Daily

Posted December 21st, 2012 in asylum, EC law, law reports, refugees, United Nations by tracey

Abed El Karem El Kott and others v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (ENSZ Menekültügyi Főbiztossága intervening): (Case C-364/11); [2012] WLR (D) 390

“On its proper interpretation, article 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise needed international protection, and the content of the protection granted, the cessation of protection or assistance from organs or agencies of the United Nations other than the High Commission for Refugees ‘for any reason’ included the situation in which a person who, after actually availing himself of such protection or assistance, had ceased to receive it for a reason beyond his control and independent of his volition. Where the competent authorities of the member state responsible for examining the application for asylum established that the condition relating to the cessation of the protection or assistance provided by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) was satisfied, the fact that that person was ipso facto ‘entitled to the benefits of [the] Directive’ meant that that member state must recognise him as a refugee within the meaning of article 2(c) of the Directive and that person must automatically be granted refugee status, provided always that he was not caught by article 12(1)(b) or (2) and (3) of the Directive.”

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Leno Merken BV v Hageldruis Beheer BV – WLR Daily

Posted December 21st, 2012 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by tracey

Leno Merken BV v Hageldruis Beheer BV: (Case C-149/11); [2012] WLR (D) 388

“The territorial borders of the member states should be disregarded in the assessment of whether a trade mark had been put to ‘genuine use in the Community’ within the meaning of article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community Trade Mark (OJ 2009 L78, p 1).”

WLR Daily, 19th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Men set to lose £10,000 in pension rule change – Daily Telegraph

Posted December 20th, 2012 in EC law, insurance, news, pensions, sex discrimination by tracey

“Male pensioners will lose up to £10,000 in retirement income due to the
introduction this week of European Court rules banning sex discrimination by
financial firms, a report warns.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 20th December 2012

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Volunteers’ status under anti discrimination law: where to now? – Cloisters

Posted December 19th, 2012 in EC law, employment, equality, news, volunteers by sally

“Judgment in the case of X v. Mid Sussex CAB was handed down by the Supreme Court 12th December 2012, in which it was held that volunteers (unpaid workers) qualify for protection from discrimination under the employment provisions of European or domestic anti discrimination law. The principle disagreement between the parties (a volunteer legal advisor and a CAB) was about the proper interpretation of Article 3 of the Framework Directive, which underlies the relevant legislation. The Appellant had argued that certain volunteers in certain situations do fall within scope – namely those whose volunteer activities closely resemble paid work. The CAB argued that no volunteers fall within the legislation, irrespective of the nature of the work that they do. In dismissing the appeal, the Court held that the law in this area was sufficiently free from doubt, such that there was no need to refer any questions to the CJEU.”

Full story (PDF)

Cloisters, December 2012

Source: www.cloisters.com

O and another v Maahanmuuttovirasto; Maahanmuuttovirasto v L – WLR Daily

Posted December 10th, 2012 in citizenship, EC law, families, human rights, immigration, law reports by sally

O and another v Maahanmuuttovirasto Maahanmuuttovirasto v L (Joined Cases C-356/11 and C-357/11); [2012] WLR (D) 371

“In circumstances where a third country national husband had married another third country national lawfully resident in the European Union and where the first child, an EU citizen, was a child of the wife’s former marriage to an EU citizen and the second child was a child of their own marriage, a member state could refuse to grant the third country national husband a residence permit on the basis of family reunification where he sought to derive the right of residence from his wife’s first child on the basis of the child’s enjoyment of EU citizenship pursuant to article 20FEU of the FEU Treaty. In those circumstances, however, Council Directive 2003/86/EC on the right to family reunification could apply.”

WLR Daily, 6th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Dittrich – WLR Daily

Posted December 10th, 2012 in civil partnerships, civil servants, EC law, employment, equality, law reports, marriage, medical treatment, sexual orientation discrimination by sally

Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Dittrich (Joined Cases C-124/11, C-125/11 and C-143/11); [2012] WLR (D) 370

“On the proper interpretation of article 3(1)(c) and 3(3) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, assistance granted to public servants in the event of illness fell within the scope of the Directive if it was the responsibility of the state, as a public employer, to finance it, that being a matter for the national court to determine.”

WLR Daily, 6th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Internet traffic data and debt collection: privacy implications – Panopticon

Posted December 6th, 2012 in data protection, EC law, internet, news, privacy by sally

“Mr Probst was a subscriber to the internet service provider (ISP) Verizon. He failed to pay his bill. A company called ‘nexnet’, the assignee of Verizon’s debt, sought to collect the sums due. In doing so, it obtained and used his internet traffic data in accordance with its ‘data protection and confidentiality agreement’ with Verizon. Disinclined to pay up, Mr Probst argued that nexnet had processed his personal data unlawfully and that the relevant terms of its agreement with Verizon purporting to sanction that processing were void. The first-instance German court agreed with him, but the appellate court did not.”

Full story

Panopticon, 5th December 2012

Source: www.panopticonblog.com

The 1996 Hague Convention: The Fourth Dimension – Family Law Week

Posted December 3rd, 2012 in child abduction, EC law, human rights, news, parental responsibility, treaties by sally

“Eleri Jones barrister at 1 Garden Court, and Anne-Marie Hutchinson OBE and Richard Kwan both of Dawson Cornwell solicitors consider the impact of the 1996 Hague Convention in England and Wales.”

Full story

Family Law Week, 30th November 2012

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

M v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and another – WLR Daily

Posted December 3rd, 2012 in asylum, EC law, judicial review, law reports, refugees by sally

M v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and another (Case C-277/11); [2012] WLR (D) 359

“The co-operation requirement in the second sentence of article 4(1) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, did not require a competent national authority to inform an applicant, whose application for refugee status had already been rejected, of its intention to refuse, and its reasons for refusing, a request for subsidiary protection before adopting such a decision in order to enable the applicant to make known his views in that regard.”

WLR Daily, 22nd December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Econord SpA v Comune di Cagno and others – WLR Daily

Posted December 3rd, 2012 in contracts, EC law, law reports, local government, public procurement, tenders by sally

Econord SpA v Comune di Cagno and others (Joined Cases C-182/11 and C-183/11); [2012] WLR (D) 356

“The condition established by the case law of the Court of Justice European Union (Teckal Srl v Comune di Viano (Case C-107/98) [1999] ECR I-8121 and Parking Brixen GmbH v Gemeinde Brixen (Case C-485/03) [2005] ECR I-8585) to the effect that, in order to be exempted from their obligation to initiate a public tendering procedure and instead to make an in-house award of a contract to a jointly owned municipal company, public authorities had to jointly exercise over that entity control similar to the control they exercised over their own departments, was fulfilled where each of those authorities not only held capital in that entity, but also played a role in its managing bodies.”

WLR Daily, 29th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Pringle v Government of Ireland and another – WLR Daily

Posted November 29th, 2012 in EC law, law reports, news, treaties by sally

Pringle v Government of Ireland and another (Case 370/12); [2012] WLR (D) 350

“Articles 4(3)TEU and 13TEU of the EU Treaty and articles 2(3)FEU, 3(1)(c) and (2)FEU, 119FEU to 123FEU and 125FEU to 127FEU of the FEU Treaty, and the general principle of effective judicial protection did not preclude the conclusion between the member states (whose currency was the euro) of an agreement such as the Treaty establishing the European stability mechanism between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Finland (the ESM Treaty), concluded at Brussels on 2 February 2012, or the ratification of that Treaty by those member states.”

WLR Daily, 27th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Confusion over JR clampdown – LegalVoice

Posted November 29th, 2012 in appeals, costs, EC law, environmental protection, fees, judicial review, news, planning, time limits by sally

“Lawyers are baffled by some parts of the government’s outline for judicial review reform, and warn that other parts could ‘endanger compliance with EU law’, writes Elizabeth Davidson.”

Full story

LegalVoice, 29th November 2012

Source: www.legalvoice.org.uk

Hugely important report due imminently… no, not that one – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted November 28th, 2012 in EC law, human rights, news, reports by sally

“Remember the Commission on a Bill of Rights? You know, the one set up by the Government in the early days of the Coalition to sort out the Human Rights Act? No, not the Leveson Inquiry; that’s about the media (you may have heard that it is reporting tomorrow). CBOR is the one with the eight lawyers, four selected by each of the Coalition partners, a bit like a legal Brady Bunch.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 28th November 2012

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in EC law, insolvency, jurisdiction, law reports, winding up by sally

Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and another v Christianapol sp z oo (Case C-116/11); [2012] WLR (D) 340

“On the proper interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000, it was for the national law of the member state in which insolvency proceedings had been opened to determine at which moment the closure of those proceedings occurred. Where proceedings had a protective purpose, it was permissible to open secondary insolvency proceedings in the member state in which the debtor had an establishment. The court before which an application to have secondary insolvency proceedings opened had been made, could not examine the insolvency of a debtor against which main proceedings had been opened in another member state, even where the latter proceedings had a protective purpose.”

WLR Daily, 22nd November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Moreno v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and another – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2012 in contribution, EC law, law reports, pensions, sex discrimination by sally

Moreno v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and another (Case C-385/11); [2012] WLR (D) 339

“Article 4 of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security precluded legislation of a member state which required a proportionally greater contribution period from part-time workers, the vast majority of whom were women, than from full-time workers for the former to qualify, if appropriate, for a contributory retirement pension in an amount reduced in proportion to the part-time nature of their work.”

WLR Daily, 22nd November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Samin v Westminster City Council – WLR Daily

Posted November 23rd, 2012 in benefits, disabled persons, EC law, homelessness, housing, immigration, law reports by tracey

Samin v Westminster City Council: [2012] EWCA Civ 1468; [2012] WLR (D) 336

“A migrant worker from another EU member state who could not establish that he was temporarily unable to work as a result of illness or accident within regulation 6(2)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 was not entitled to housing provision from a local authority as a homeless person under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996.”

WLR Daily, 21st November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Deja Vu All Over Again (and again) – NearlyLegal

Posted November 23rd, 2012 in benefits, disabled persons, EC law, homelessness, housing, immigration, news by tracey

“In Samin v Westminster CC [2012] EWCA Civ 1468, the Court of Appeal had to decide what was meant by someone being ‘temporarily unable to work’ so as to determine if Mr Samin retained his status as a ‘worker’ under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006.”

Full story

NearlyLegal, 22nd November 2012

Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted November 21st, 2012 in compensation, EC law, enforcement, insurance, jurisdiction, law reports, transport by sally

Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and others v Samskip GmbH (Case C-456/11); [2012] WLR (D) 329

“On the proper interpretation of articles 32 and 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p 1), the court of a member state in which recognition was sought of a judgment by which a court of another member state had declined jurisdiction on the basis of a jurisdiction clause was bound by the finding—declaring the action inadmissible—regarding the validity of that judgment.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

UK continues to oppose new single EU data protection law regime – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 14th, 2012 in data protection, EC law, jurisdiction, news by sally

“The UK, together with a number of other EU member states, is still opposed to the creation of a new singularly applicable data protection regime across the trading bloc, according to a new report.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 13th November 2012

Source: www.out-law.com