‘A case concerning the interrelationship between the public sector equality duty and the court’s discretion to make a possession order because of false representations is to go to the Court of Appeal, it has been reported.’
Local Government Lawyer, 16th May 2019
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘The Supreme Court has ruled in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2019] UKSC 22 that the Investigatory Powers Tribunal’s decisions are nevertheless amenable to judicial review, despite the existence of a powerfully-drawn ‘ouster clause’ preventing its decisions from being questioned by a court.’
UK Human Rights Blog, 15th May 2019
Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com
Supreme Court
Telereal Trillium v Hewitt (Valuation Officer) [2019] UKSC 23 (15 May 2019)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Anderson v Turning Point Eespro [2019] EWCA Civ 815 (15 May 2019)
Merinson v Yukos International UK BV & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 830 (15 May 2019)
Tinkler v Ferguson & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 819 (15 May 2019)
Revenue And Customs v Tooth [2019] EWCA Civ 826 (15 May 2019)
Airbus S.A.S. v Generali Italia S.P.A. & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 805 (14 May 2019)
Owen v AMEC Foster Wheeler Energy Ltd & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 822 (14 May 2019)
Staechelin & Ors v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 817 (14 May 2019)
Kuteh v Dartford And Gravesham NHS Trust [2019] EWCA Civ 818 (14 May 2019)
Gaia Ventures Ltd v Abbeygate Helical (Leisure Plaza) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 823 (14 May 2019)
Euro Pools Plc v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc [2019] EWCA Civ 808 (13 May 2019)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Maguire, R (On the Application Of) v United Response & Ors [2019] EWHC 1232 (Admin) (15 May 2019)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Mussell & Anor v Patience & Anor [2019] EWHC 1231 (Ch) (15 May 2019)
Gracie & Anor v Rose [2019] EWHC 1176 (Ch) (10 May 2019)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Nobiskrug GmbH v Valla Yachts Ltd [2019] EWHC 1219 (Comm) (14 May 2019)
116 Cardamon Ltd v Macalister & Anor [2019] EWHC 1200 (Comm) (14 May 2019)
Teesside Gas Transportation Ltd v CATS North Sea Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1220 (Comm) (14 May 2019)
High Court (Family Division)
Uhd v McKay [2019] EWHC 1239 (Fam) (15 May 2019)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Allen v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] EWHC 1235 (QB) (15 May 2019)
Gilchrist v Greater Manchester Police [2019] EWHC 1233 (QB) (15 May 2019)
Patel v Arriva Midlands Ltd & Anor [2019] EWHC 1216 (QB) (14 May 2019)
Head v The Culver Heating Co Ltd [2019] EWHC 1217 (QB) (14 May 2019)
Bailey & Ors v Glaxosmithkline (UK) Ltd [2019] EWHC 1167 (QB) (09 May 2019)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Moorjani & Ors v Durban Estates Ltd & Anor [2019] EWHC 1229 (TCC) (15 May 2019)
RGB P&C Ltd v Victory House General Partner Ltd [2019] EWHC 1188 (TCC) (10 May 2019)
Thomas & Anor v Taylor Wimpey Developments Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1134 (TCC) (09 May 2019)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘The UK’s highest court has rejected a legal challenge to the benefit cap made by campaigners who argued that it discriminated against single parents with young children.’
The Guardian, 15th May 2019
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Family courts in England and Wales are not properly accommodating children’s voices and needs because the government has suggested “it would all cost too much”, their former head has said.’
BBC News, 16th May 2019
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘The supervision of all offenders in the community is to be undertaken by the state in a major renationalisation of the probation sector, just five years after Chris Grayling introduced a widely derided programme of privatisation while justice secretary.’
The Guardian, 16th May 2019
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Police chiefs are taking legal action against one of their former undercover officers who fathered a child during his covert infiltration of leftwing groups and then abandoned him.’
The Guardian, 14th May 2019
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Pension trustees have not been allowed to justify an increase pension contributions with rule changes that happened two years later. The Court of Appeal in the UK has ruled that trustees cannot use rule changes from 1993 to rectify mistakes made in 1991.’
OUT-LAW.com, 15th May 2019
Source: www.out-law.com
‘Inter alia, The Supreme Court held, by a majority, that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, s 67(8) did not “oust” the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court to quash a decision of the IPT for error of law. Following authority, it was clear that the drafter of s 67(8) would have had no doubt that a determination vitiated by any error of law, jurisdictional or not, was to be treated as no determination at all, and so could not be ousted. The plain words of the subsection must yield to the principle that such a clause will not protect a decision that is legally invalid, as there is a common law presumption against ousting the High Court’s jurisdiction.’
UKSC Blog, 15th May 2019
Source: ukscblog.com
‘A High Court judge has rejected claims made by a parish council that an international congregation of nuns conspired to provide false information to a district council in order to obtain planning permission for a former school site.’
Local Government Lawyer, 14th May 2019
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘This appeal considered whether the application of the revised benefit cap, introduced by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016, s 8, to lone parents with children under two years old (i) unlawfully discriminates against parents and/or the children, contrary to ECHR, art 14 with art 8, and/or art 2 of the First Protocol and in breach of the UK’s international obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, art 3, and/or (ii) is irrelevant.’
UKSC Blog, 15th May 2019
Source: ukscblog.com
‘Section 1 of the Equality Act 2010 asks public authorities to actively consider the way in which their policies and their most strategic decisions can increase or decrease inequalities. I am talking about the socio-economic duty. However, successive governments since 2010 have failed to commence it, to bring it to life in technical terms, which means that public authorities are not technically bound by Section 1.’
Oxford Human Rights Hub, 15th May 2019
Source: ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk
‘Two high court judges have said fresh proceedings can be brought against Tommy Robinson for alleged contempt of court over the filming of people involved in a criminal trial.’
The Guardian, 14th May 2019
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Complaints against payday lenders have soared to a five year high, the industry watchdog has said.’
BBC News, 15th May 2019
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘The number of Britons with a sexual interest in children may be seven times higher than previously thought, the head of the National Crime Agency has said.’
The Guardian, 14th May 2019
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘ In Kuteh v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust [2019] EWCA Civ 818, the Claimant was a nursing sister employed by the Trust. She was a “committed Christian”; and in March and April 2016, staff in her department told her superiors that patients had been complaining that when they were being assessed by Mrs Kuteh she had been raising matters of religion and faith with them. One patient complained that she had been asked “what she thought Easter was about”, another that he had been asked what he thought being a Christian meant and a third, about to undergo major surgery for bowel cancer, that she had told him that if he prayed to God he would have a better chance of survival. In the end, she was dismissed: she lost her claim in the Employment Tribunal and, in an unreported judgment, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the grounds for an appeal to it were unarguable and dismissed her appeal from the ET’s decision[1]. [For the detailed background, see Mrs S Kuteh v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust (England and Wales: Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2302764/2016.]’
Law & Religion UK, 14th May 2019
Source: www.lawandreligionuk.com
‘In a scathing 17-page judgment, the Court of Appeal has thrown out an attempt by the Post Office to appeal a judge’s refusal to recuse himself from group litigation on the grounds of bias. Ruling in Post Office Limited v Alan Bates & Ors, the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Coulson said that the recusal application ‘never had any substance and was rightly rejected by the judge’.’
Law Society's Gazette, 14th May 2019
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
© Inner Temple Library 2025