Double jeopardy case: Wendell Baker jailed for pensioner rape – BBC News
“A man convicted under the amended double jeopardy law of raping a pensioner has been jailed for life.”
BBC News, 28th June 2013
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
“A man convicted under the amended double jeopardy law of raping a pensioner has been jailed for life.”
BBC News, 28th June 2013
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
RM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 775 (28 June 2013)
Intrigue Shipping Inc & Ors v Nikitin & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 749 (27 June 2013)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Saunders & Ors v R [2013] EWCA Crim 1027 (28 June 2013)
Lawrence, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 1054 (28 June 2013)
Edmondson & Ors v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 1026 (28 June 2013)
Tahery, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1053 (27 June 2013)
Austin, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 1028 (27 June 2013)
McNally v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 1051 (27 June 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Derbyshire County Council v High Peak Magistrates’ Court [2013] EWHC 1762 (Admin) (27 June 2013)
High Court (Family Division)
UL v BK [2013] EWHC 1735 (Fam) (24 June 2013)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Co-Operative Group Ltd v Birse Developments Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 1790 (TCC) (27 June 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org.uk
“The Moors murderer Ian Brady should stay in psychiatric hospital, a mental health tribunal has ruled. The judge-led panel decided Brady was still sufficiently mentally ill to continue holding him at Ashworth secure mental hospital in Merseyside, where he has been since 1985.”
The Guardian, 28th June 2013
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
“Five former News of the World staff members, including ex-editors Rebekah Brooks
and Andy Coulson, have lost a legal attempt to block their prosecution on phone
hacking charges.”
BBC News, 28th June 2013
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
“Changes to the information that companies must include in their remuneration
reports are set to come into force from 1 October following the Government’s
publication of the final rules.”
OUT-LAW.com, 27th June 2013
Source: www.out-law.com
“Where a charity contributed to the purchase of a property, to be held on trust for it and other, non-charitable, contributors in proportion to their contributions, the ‘chargeable interest acquired’ by reference to which stamp duty land tax was to be levied under Part 4 of the Finance Act 2003 was the equitable estate collectively acquired by the beneficiaries under the trust. However, paragraph 1(1) of Schedule 8 to the 2003 Act was to be interpreted as exempting the land transaction from charge to the extent of the charity’s interest.”
WLR Daily. 26th June 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“Since the undisputed evidence was that homosexuals were routinely persecuted in Jamaica, the Secretary of State had acted unlawfully in designating Jamaica, under section 94(5)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, as a state where there was ‘in general no serious risk of persecution of persons entitled to reside in that state.’ ”
WLR Daily, 12th June 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“Table 10 of Appendix A of paragraph 245FD of the Immigration Rules required that an applicant for leave to remain under the Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) provisions of the points-based system therein should have obtained the appropriate qualification before making the application in order to obtain the necessary points.”
WLR Daily, 25th June 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
The Rent Officers (Housing Benefit and Universal Credit Functions) (Amendment) Order 2013
The Child Support (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2013
The Health and Safety (Miscellaneous Revocations and Amendments) Regulations 2013
The Social Security (Persons Required to Provide Information) Regulations 2013
The Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment (Amendment) Regulations 2013
The Social Security (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 2) Regulations 2013
The Biocidal Products (Fees and Charges) Regulations 2013
The Biocidal Products and Chemicals (Appointment of Authorities and Enforcement) Regulations 2013
The Mobile Homes (Pitch Fees) (Prescribed Form) (England) Regulations 2013
The Penalties for Disorderly Behaviour (Amount of Penalty) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2013
The National Health Service (Direct Payments) (Repeal of Pilot Schemes Limitation) Order 2013
The Lawrence Sheriff School (Pupil Premium Admissions Priority) Order 2013
Source: www.legislation.gov.uk
“Courtrooms will be fully digital by 2016 ending the court service’s ‘outdated’ reliance on paper, Justice Minister Damian Green said today.”
Ministry of Jutice, 28th June 2013
Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice
“Government is to consult on improving police misconduct procedures, Policing Minister Damian Green announced on Tuesday.”
Home Office, 25th June 2013
Source: www.gov.uk/home-office
“Salahuddin Amin v Director General of MI5, Chief of MI6, the FCO, the Home Office and the Attorney General- [2013] EWHC 1579 (QB). Do not be misled by the impressive cast list of defendants in this case it means simply that the claimant was attempting to attack the integrity of his criminal conviction via the civil courts.”
UK Human Rights Blog, 27th June 2013
Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com
“Dumfries and Galloway -v- North [2013] UKSC 45. Yesterday’s much heralded equal pay ‘victory’ in the Supreme Court (see BBC Report) undoubtedly will be good news for the specific female claimants in the case who seek to vindicate their European Union rights to equal pay.”
UK Human Rights Blog, 27th June 2013
Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com
“Tough proposed sentencing guidelines will inform the level of financial penalties set by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) under new deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs), an expert has said.”
OUT-LAW.com, 28th June 2013
Source: www.out-law.com
“Employees hired to carry out jobs of equal value need not work in the same
‘establishment’ in order to benefit from protections given to those in the ‘same
employment’ under equal pay law, the UK’s highest court has confirmed.”
OUT-LAW.com, 28th June 2013
Source: www.out-law.com
“Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC).
This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. As will become clear, I’m rather troubled by some of the Court’s findings.”
NearlyLegal, 25th June 2013
Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk
“The question of when equal pay claimants can rely upon comparators employed at different establishments on common terms and conditions under s.1(6) Equal Pay Act 1970 (and now, s.79(4) Equality Act 2010) has long generated an inordinate amount of heat, not light. A unanimous Supreme Court (Lady Hale giving the single judgment) has now cleared away some of the fog of confusion in North v Dumfries and Galloway Council [2013] IKSC 45. In the process, it has overturned both the EAT and the Court of Session Inner House.”
Employment Law Blog, 27th June 2013
Source: www.employment11kbw.com
“The press would have us believe that criminals can do what they like and then merrily sue all and sundry for the unfortunate consequences of those actions. Sadly for tabloid journalists this is simply not true as the Court of Appeal recently remind us in Joyce v O’Brien [2012] EWHC 1324 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 202 (May). The case is a useful reminder of the rule often shortened to “ex turpi”, namely that the court will not allow a party to profit from a loss arising from that party’s own criminal or immoral activity.”
New Law Journal, 27th June 2013
Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk
“To widespread surprise, the Supreme Court allowed the wife’s appeal in Prest v Petrodel Resources [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] All ER (D) 90 (Jun) although on a different basis from the decision of Mr Justice Moylan at first instance. For those law “nerds” amongst us, the new Supreme Court live feed added an extra frisson, with social media abuzz with speculation as to what it might mean that Lord Sumption was to give the lead judgment. It quickly became clear that this may be a red herring (for Lady Hale to give the lead judgment would have been too obvious a clue). However, a more detailed consideration of the judgment may lead us to conclude that Lord Sumption was a clue indeed and that the corporate veil has survived fully intact, albeit it with the Supreme Court wedging open some doors for family lawyers on the issues of trusts and inferences to be drawn from both pre- and post-litigation behaviour.”
New Law Journal, 27th June 2013
Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk