Davies and another t/a All Stars Nursery (Appellants) v. The Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care (Scotland) (Respondent) – Supreme Court

Posted February 28th, 2013 in appeals, children, law reports, Scotland, social services, Supreme Court by sally

Davies and another t/a All Stars Nursery (Appellants) v. The Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care (Scotland) (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 12 | UKSC 2012/0048 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 27th February 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

The Financial Services Authority (a company limited by guarantee) (Respondent) v Sinaloa Gold plc and others (Respondents) and Barclays Bank plc (Appellant) – Supreme Court

The Financial Services Authority (a company limited by guarantee) (Respondent) v Sinaloa Gold plc and others (Respondents) and Barclays Bank plc (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 11 | UKSC 2011/0244 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 27th February 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Kutchukian v Keepers and Governors of the Possessions Revenues and Goods of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon – WLR Daily

Posted February 27th, 2013 in landlord & tenant, law reports, leases, news, tribunals, valuation by sally

Kutchukian v Keepers and Governors of the Possessions Revenues and Goods of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon [2013] EWCA Civ 90; [2013] WLR (D) 81

“When carrying out the hypothetical valuation of a property with development potential, pursuant to paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, the Upper Tribunal ought to have decided the legal position in respect of the legal rights and liabilities arising under various leases, rather than allow for uncertainty on those legal points, insofar as leaving them undetermined, by a discount for the risk.”

WLR Daily, 20th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 26th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

KL, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 98 (22 January 2013)

Ahmed, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 99 (24 January 2013)

Rabheru, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 137 (25 January 2013)

Evans, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 125 (23 January 2013)

Pouladian-Kari v R [2013] EWCA Crim 158 (22 February 2013)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

IG Index Ltd v Ehrentreu [2013] EWCA Civ 95 (22 February 2013)

Stirling, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey [2013] EWCA Civ 116 (22 February 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Chemistree Homecare Ltd v Abbvie Ltd [2013] EWHC 264 (Ch) (11 February 2013)

Hunt v Hosking & Ors [2013] EWHC 311 (Ch) (22 February 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Alternative Investment Solutions (General) Ltd v Valle De Uco Resort & Spa SA & Ors [2013] EWHC 333 (QB) (22 February 2013)

New Forest District Council v Owen & Ors [2013] EWHC 265 (QB) (22 February 2013)

High Court (Family Division)

TC and JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam) (21 February 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Navig8 PTE Ltd v Al-Riyadh Co for Vegetable Oil Industry [2013] EWHC 328 (Comm) (22 February 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

Salgado González v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 26th, 2013 in EC law, law reports, migrant workers, pensions, social services by sally

Salgado González v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and another (Case C-282/11); [2013] WLR (D) 80

“Article 48FEU of the FEU Treaty and articles 3, 46(2)(a) and 47(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (as amended), precluded legislation of a member state under which the theoretical amount of the retirement pension of a self-employed worker, migrant or non-migrant, was invariably calculated on contribution bases paid by that worker over a fixed reference period preceding the payment of his last contribution in that member state, to which a fixed divisor was applied, when it was impossible for either the duration of that period or the divisor to be adapted so as to take account of the fact that the worker concerned had exercised his right to freedom of movement.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina v Asmelash – WLR Daily

Posted February 26th, 2013 in alcohol abuse, appeals, crime, defences, homicide, law reports, murder by sally

Regina v Asmelash [2013] EWCA Crim 157; [2013] WLR (D) 79

“There was nothing in the new statutory provisions relating to the partial defence to murder of loss of self control to suggest that Parliament intended that the normal rules which applied to voluntary intoxication should not apply. That did not mean that a defendant who had been drinking was deprived of the loss of control defence, it just meant that the defence had to be approached without reference to the defendant’s voluntary intoxication.”

WLR Daily, 22nd February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Davis and another v Price and another – WLR Daily

Davis and another v Price and another [2013] EWHC 323 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 78

“Statutory demands served in respect of the liability for a debt created by an order for costs were subject to the terms of individual voluntary arrangements (‘IVAs’) proposed by the debtors and approved by creditors and therefore they should be set aside.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

N v Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser og Uddannelsesstøtt – WLR Daily

Posted February 26th, 2013 in EC law, education, freedom of movement, law reports, social security by sally

N v Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser og Uddannelsesstøtt (Case C-46/12); [2013] WLR (D) 77

“On the proper interpretation of articles 7(1) and 24(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38, a European Union citizen who pursued a course of study in a host member state whilst at the same time engaging in effective and genuine employment activities such as to confer on him the status of ‘worker’ within the meaning of article 45FEU of the FEU Treaty could not be refused maintenance aid for studies which was granted to the nationals of that member state.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Banif Plus Bank Zrt v Csipai and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 26th, 2013 in consumer protection, EC law, law reports, loans, unfair contract terms by sally

Banif Plus Bank Zrt v Csipai and another (Case C-472/11); [2013] WLR (D) 76

“A national court, in order to fulfil its obligation pursuant to articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC, to assess of its own motion whether a contractual term in a consumer contract was unfair and to establish all the consequences arising under national law of such a finding, was not obliged before giving its ruling to wait for a consumer, who had been fully informed of his rights, to submit a statement requesting that that term be declared invalid.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2013 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza
(Case C-561/11); [2013] WLR (D) 75

The exclusive right of the proprietor of a Community trade mark conferred by article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 to prohibit all third parties from using, in the course of trade, signs identical with or similar to its trade mark extended to a third-party proprietor of a later registered Community trade mark, without the need for that later mark to have previously been declared invalid.

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

In re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) – WLR Daily

In re J (Children) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 9; [2013] WLR (D) 74

“A real possibility that a parent had harmed a child in the past was not, by itself, sufficient to establish that some other child that he or she now had care of was ‘likely to suffer significant harm’ within the meaning of section 31(2)(a) of the Children Act 1989 so as to meet the threshold for initiating care proceedings in respect of that other child.”

WLR Daily, 20th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Tewkesbury Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2013 in housing, law reports, local government, planning, time limits by sally

Tewkesbury Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and others [2013] EWHC 286 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 73

“The Localism Act 2011 made significant changes to the planning system, but did not eliminate the role of the Secretary of State in determining planning applications.”

WLR Daily, 20th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Hooper and another v Oates – WLR Daily

Posted February 22nd, 2013 in appeals, contracts, damages, law reports, sale of land by sally

Hooper and another v Oates [2013] EWCA Civ 91; [2013] WLR (D) 72

“The date for assessment of damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land where the purchaser had failed or refused to complete the purchase was not the date of the breach but the date when the vendors brought to an end their reasonable attempts to resell the property and took the property back for their own use.”

WLR Daily, 20th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Highbury Pension Fund Management Co and another v Zirfin Investments Ltd and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 22nd, 2013 in banking, debts, guarantees, law reports, loans by sally

Highbury Pension Fund Management Co and another v Zirfin Investments Ltd and others [2013] EWHC 238 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 71

“A creditor was entitled to invoke the equitable doctrine of marshalling to claim the benefit of securities held by a doubly-secured creditor even if the two securities did not both come from a debtor if one of the securities derived from a principal for whom the debtor stood surety.”

WLR Daily, 14th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 22nd, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Shillam v R [2013] EWCA Crim 160 (22 February 2013)

Asmelash v R [2013] EWCA Crim 157 (22 February 2013)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

BAA Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2013] EWCA Civ 112 (21 February 2013)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Genentech Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 93 (21 February 2013)

Dear & Anor v Jackson [2013] EWCA Civ 89 (22 February 2013)

Evans, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 115 (22 February 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Marconi Corporation Plc (now Telent Limited), Re [2013] EWHC 324 (Ch) (21 February 2013)

Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer Plc & Anor [2013] EWHC 273 (Ch) (21 February 2013)

Davis & Anor v Price & Anor [2013] EWHC 323 (Ch) (21 February 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

McCann & Anor v Bennett [2013] EWHC 283 (QB) (21 February 2013)

McCann & Anor v Bennett (Sentencing Remarks) [2013] EWHC 332 (QB) (21 February 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

On Line Design & Engineering Ltd v Engineering Construction Industry Training Board [2013] EWHC 287 (Admin) (21 February 2013)

Ahzaz v The United States of America [2013] EWHC 216 (Admin) (21 February 2013)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Zennstrom & Anor v Fagot & Ors [2013] EWHC 288 (TCC) (21 February 2013)

Mueller Europe Ltd v Central Roofing (South Wales) Ltd [2013] EWHC 237 (TCC) (22 February 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

Ricoh Europe Holdings BV and others v Spratt and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2013 in appeals, law reports, liquidators, winding up by sally

Ricoh Europe Holdings BV and others v Spratt and another [2013] EWCA Civ 92; [2013] WLR (D) 70

“A liquidator who had already valued a creditor’s contingent claims pursuant to rule 4.86 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 and so admitted them to proof in the amount of the valuation was not under a duty to provide for the contingency in full by making a reserve against any distribution to members.”

WLR Daily, 19th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2013 in appeals, child abuse, children, judges, judgments, law reports, Supreme Court by sally

In re L and another (Children) (Preliminary Finding: Power to Reverse) [2013] UKSC 8; [2013] WLR (D) 69

“Contrary to the practice previously adopted, a judge’s power to reverse his or her decision at any time before the court order had been sealed was not reserved for exceptional circumstances. A carefully considered change of mind by the judge was permisssible in the interests of the overriding objective of dealing with a case justly.”

WLR Daily, 20th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina (Zacchaeus 2000 Trust) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2013 in housing, judicial review, law reports, rent, social security by sally

Regina (Zacchaeus 2000 Trust) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 233 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 68

“The regime for the provision of housing benefit to private sector tenants enabled the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to cap increases in permitted levels of housing benefit by reference to the general rate of inflation.”

WLR Daily, 15th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Santander UK plc v Harrison and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2013 in banking, consumer credit, law reports, loans, mortgages by sally

Santander UK plc v Harrison and another [2013] EWHC 199 (QB); [2013] WLR (D) 67

“The rescheduling of a mortgage agreement did not amount to providing credit ‘in the form of a cash loan’ for the purposes of article 4(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (Commencement No 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2008.”

WLR Daily, 7th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

H (A Protected Party) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis – WLR Daily

H (A Protected Party) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2013] EWCA Civ 69; [2013] WLR (D) 66

“The statutory defence in section 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 did not impose impossible demands on those who did acts in connection with the care or treatment of others who lacked capacity. It required no more than what was reasonable, practical and appropriate. What that entailed depended on all the circumstances.”

WLR Daily, 14th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk