Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros SA and others v Enesa Engenharia SA and others [2012] EWCA Civ 638; [2012] WLR (D) 148

“Where a commercial contract contained a choice of law clause exclusively in favour of one country and a jurisdiction clause giving the courts of the same country exclusive jurisdiction, but an arbitration clause by which the seat of the arbitration was to be in a different country, the issue of the proper law of the arbitration clause was a matter of contractual interpretation. The proper law depended on all the terms of the particular contract, when read in the light of the surrounding circumstances and commercial common sense.”

WLR Daily, 16th May 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk