‘Logbook lenders’ are flouting the law, say debt advisers – The Guardian
‘Innocent car buyers can lose their vehicles under ‘bills of sale’ rules dating back to the Victorian era.’
The Guardian, 16th February 2014
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
‘Innocent car buyers can lose their vehicles under ‘bills of sale’ rules dating back to the Victorian era.’
The Guardian, 16th February 2014
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
‘In 2012/2013 602 appeals were allowed by the immigration courts, including 324 criminals allowed to stay in Britain because of their right to a family life.’
Daily Telegraph, 15th February 2014
Source: www.telegraph.co.uk
‘A maintenance worker has been jailed over the death of a girl who fell 60ft (18m) from a balcony in Sheffield.’
BBC News, 14th February 2014
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A Muslim convert who targeted members of the public as part of a campaign for a sharia state in Britain has been given a groundbreaking asbo, police have said.’
The Guardian, 15th February 2014
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
‘On 11th December 2013 the Court of Appeal gave judgment in Davidson v Aegis [2013] EWCA Civ 1586. The case provides a useful and up to date reminder of the applicable principles when a Court is asked to use section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to disapply the primary limitation period in a personal injuries action.’
Zenith Chambers, 5th February 2014
Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk
‘Just when the bankers and financiers of the world thought it was safe to begin trading again in the shark infested waters of high finance after showing their contrition with the payment of multi-billion dollar fines to various regulators worldwide following the debacle of the Libor Scandal, a further scandal is looming which has the potential to dwarf Libor and lead to further collateral investigations into other asset classes across the board – welcome to the year of the Forex!’
Six Pump Court, 12th February 2014
Source: www.6pumpcourt.co.uk
‘It can be difficult at the best of times to establish liability in claims involving pedestrians. Expert evidence should, hopefully, make the task easier, but this case is a useful reminder that even seemingly robust expert evidence may not be enough for a party to succeed.’
Zenith Chambers, 5th February 2014
Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk
‘The High Court is now to include a formally designated Planning Court and permission to apply will be required for section 288 applications against planning decisions in the latest government reforms to judicial review and related proceedings. Ministers have just published their response to the latest reform proposals and the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill 2014 proposing changes to judicial review.’
Thirty Nine Essex Street, February 2014
Source: www.39essex.com
‘The headline in The Guardian on Wednesday 29th January 2014 (“Metropolitan Police accused of acting on behalf of big business”) would undoubtedly have caused a stir amongst private prosecutors, public prosecutors, the police, the Home Office and others interested in the issue of commercial organisations seeking redress in the criminal courts in relation to crimes committed against them. The story, based upon observations made by the Lord Chief Justice in a recent Court of Appeal case, queried the efficacy of private prosecutions brought in such circumstances and – quoting labour MP Tom Watson and Jenny Jones, a London assembly member for the Green party – suggested that they represented the “…creeping privatisation of policing…”. The former spoke of “…two tier-policing where corporate interests can buy the time of the police…” whilst the latter complained, “I hate the thought that if you are rich you can buy more justice than if you are poor…”. And yet at a time when funding for public bodies – and in particular prosecuting authorities – is under such severe strain, it is inevitable that there will be a growing demand for the private sector to operate in areas that were once solely or mainly inhabited by the state. Private prosecutions are here to stay – that much is clear from the case concerned. But are the criticisms levelled against them fair? And what is the real impact of the case on private prosecutions, confiscation and compensation and the very real problem of fraud on commerce? ‘
Six Pump Court, 5th February 2014
Source: www.6pumpcourt.co.uk
‘Despite the 146 notice having been around, in one form or another, for more than 130 years, it is still causing as much angst as ever. The High Court appeal in Anders v Haralambous [2013] EWHC 2676 (QB), in which John de Waal QC acted for the Respondent, highlights the added complication of the interaction between s146 and the determination of breach pursuant to s168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.’
Hardwicke Chambers, 4th February 2014
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
‘We are all sadly familiar with the last-minute application for an adjournment backed
by a doctor’s note, on the grounds that the defendant, claimant or important witness
is unfit to attend Court. Almost inevitably, the note in question is unsatisfactory or
insufficient. It frequently takes the jejune form of “Mrs X is suffering from an anxiety
state and is unfit to attend Court”, and that is all.’
Zenith Chambers, 5th February 2014
Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk
‘Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, could be forgiven for thinking that 2014 is not shaping up to be a great year for him. In the last month, the list of tribunal decisions freeing tenants from the so-called bedroom tax has been growing ever larger.’
Hardwicke Chambers, 12th February 2014
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
‘The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Bishop v Golstein [2014] EWCA Civ 10, handed down on 5th February 2014, and the first instance decision of Christopher Nugee QC (now Nugee J) (reported at [2014] Ch 131) both contain useful guidance for partnership lawyers advising clients in connection with dissolution and remedies where the partnership relationship has irretrievably broken down. Whether a partnership can be dissolved by acceptance of arepudiatory breach is probably one of the most contentious issues in modern partnership law. The first instance decision is now the leading authority on this issue in two partners firms, whilst the Court of Appeal’s decision sets out some pointers. Amanda Eilledge explains.’
11 Stone Buildings, February 2014
Source: www.11sb.com
‘One encounters the following situation fairly routinely in practice. On Monday the parties sign a carefully drafted and negotiated contract intended to govern all aspects of their relationship. Detailed mechanisms purport to cater for all eventualities. By Friday, the parties have slipped into a mode of performance which, in material respects, differs radically from the provisions of the contract.’
Henderson Chambers, 10th February 2014
Source: www.hendersonchambers.co.uk
‘In November 2010 the Housing Minister Grant Shapps identified what he perceived to be a problem with social housing:
“For far too long in this country there has been a lazy consensus about the use of social housing, which has left one of our most valuable resources trapped in a system that helps far fewer people than it should. This out-of-date approach has seen waiting lists rocket and is unfair to people who genuinely need social homes. They trap existing tenants in poverty, often in homes that aren’t suitable for them.”
After consultation the Government came up with some proposed solutions which involved a radical re-think of the way social housing was to be allocated and administered. The ideas included: flexible tenancies, fairer allocations, greater mobility, fairer provision for homeless, affordable rents and tenants’ powers of scrutiny.’
Hardwicke Chambers, 12th February 2014
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
‘The impending tax changes for the taxation of the members of LLP have been generating significant concerns, not only for our LLP clients but also Law firms themselves. The prospect of firms having a NIC liability, and the tax consequences for individual members themselves, have concentrated legal minds both internally and externally.’
Littleton Chambers, 4th February 2014
Source: www.littletonchambers.com
‘An erroneous decision to register land as a village green is catastrophic for the owner. Once
registered as a green, the land is effectively sterilised for ever. To put right a mistaken registration is not at all easy. This is for two reasons.’
New Square Chambers, 7th February 2014
Source: www.newsquarechambers.co.uk
‘Following recent announcements in the press, including a front page headline in The Times this week, the Government published the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill on Wednesday, 5 February 2014. Part 4 of the Bill contains a number of important changes to be introduced which seek, in the words of the Lord Chancellor, to prevent judicial review from being a “brake on growth”. However, whilst it has been reported in the national press that the proposals mean that only individuals or groups with a financial interest in a case will be able to bring a challenge, this is inaccurate. The Government originally proposed narrowing the test for standing so as to restrict the availability of judicial review to those with a “direct interest” but that proposal has now been dropped.’
No. 5 Chambers, 6th February 2014
Source: www.no5.com
Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant (Earl of Seafield) and others [2014] UKSC 9; [2014] WLR (D) 64
‘A contracting party could be liable in negligence for a representation made in pre-contractual negotiations which induced the conclusion of the contract by someone other than the original representee.’
WLR Daily, 12th February 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk