The Battle of Revolax – Fox Group International Ltd v Teleta Pharma Ltd – NIPC Law

Posted July 23rd, 2021 in EC law, intellectual property, news, trade marks by sally

‘There really was a battle of Revolax between Russia and Sweden in 1808 but that has nothing to do with this article. Revolax is also the name of a hyaluronic acid dermal filler manufactured by the Korean company Across Co., Ltd (“Across”) which Fox Group International Ltd. (“Fox”) enjoyed the exclusive right to distribute in the UK.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 23rd July 2021

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Anarchy in UK court? Ex-Sex Pistols sue singer Johnny Rotten – The Independent

Posted July 16th, 2021 in artistic works, copyright, intellectual property, licensing, news by tracey

‘Two former members of the Sex Pistols are suing singer Johnny Rotten for the right to use the band’s songs in an upcoming television series about the anarchic punk rock icons.’

Full Story

The Independent, 15th July 2021

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Ep 137: The Law of Artificial Intelligence – Law Pod UK

‘In the latest episode of Law Pod UK Rosalind English talks to Matt Hervey, co-editor with Matthew Lavy of a new practitioner’s text book on Artificial Intelligence. Matt is Head of Artificial Intelligence at Gowling WLG., and advises on all aspects of AI and Intellectual Property, particularly in relation to the life sciences, automotive, aviation, financial and retail sectors. Our discussion ranges across many areas covered by the book, including negligence, liability for physical and economic harm, AI and professional liability, and more on AI and intellectual property, a fascinating subject which Matt touches on in this episode.’

Full Story

Law Pod UK, 1st March 2021

Source: audioboom.com

University of Law fails to block trade mark in dispute with former student – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 6th, 2020 in intellectual property, legal education, news, trade marks, universities by tracey

‘The University of Law has lost major elements of a trade mark dispute against a start-up that helps teenagers get into law school, after claiming the branding could damage its reputation.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 5th November 2020

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

The Supreme Court’s decision in Unwired Planet – what comes next? – Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers

‘The UK Supreme Court has handed down its long-awaited judgment in Unwired Planet. Its decision has profound implications for patent owners and implementers alike and is likely to lead to heavily contested jurisdictional disputes going forward.’

Full Story

Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers, 15th September 2020

Source: competitionbulletin.com

The Supreme Court’s decision in Unwired Planet – what comes next? – Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers

‘The UK Supreme Court has handed down its long-awaited judgment in Unwired Planet. Its decision has profound implications for patent owners and implementers alike and is likely to lead to heavily contested jurisdictional disputes going forward.’

Full Story

Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers, 15th September

Source: competitionbulletin.com

Moral rights: why should developers care? – Practical Law: Construction Blog

Posted September 11th, 2020 in artistic works, construction industry, contracts, intellectual property, news by tracey

‘Question: What do the Oslo Picasso murals “The Seagull” and the “The Fishermen” and the Dutch De View Jaargetijden have in common? Answer: They both have been subject to recent high cost, high profile litigation that dragged on for years and which concerned moral rights.’

Full Story

Practical Law: Construction Blog, 9th September 2020

Source: constructionblog.practicallaw.com

‘Fair and reasonable’ telecom IP ruling is boost for UK courts – Law Society’s Gazette

‘Long-awaited Supreme Court rulings on mobile phone patents will boost the UK’s position as a forum for resolving global IP licensing disputes, specialist lawyers said today.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 26th August 2020

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Case Comment: Regeneron v Kymab [2020] UKSC 27 – UKSC Blog

Posted July 3rd, 2020 in appeals, intellectual property, news, patents, Supreme Court by sally

‘In this case comment, Caitlin Heard, Frances Denney and Robert Stephen, who all work within the intellectual property team at CMS, comment on the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in June 2020 in the matter of Regeneron v Kymab [2020] UKSC 27, which concerns whether patents were invalid for insufficiency.’

Full Story

UKSC Blog, 2nd July 2020

Source: ukscblog.com

Practice – Injunctions pending Appeal Evalve Inc v Edwards Lifesciences Ltd – NIPC Law

Posted June 22nd, 2020 in appeals, injunctions, intellectual property, news, patents by sally

‘In Evalve Inc and others v Edwards Lifesciences Ltd #1 [2020] EWHC 514 (Pat) (12 March 2020)). Mr Justice Birss held that two patents that protected the market for a device known as the MitraClip were valid and infringed. In Evalve Inc and others v Edwards Lifesciences Ltd (#2) [2020] EWHC 513 (Pat) (12 March 2020) Mr Justice Birss rejected the defendant’s contention that it should be allowed to market its product notwithstanding the judgment on the ground that some patients were assisted by a product that competed with the MitraClip but not by the MitraClip itself. I blogged about those cases in Patents – Evalve Inc. and Others v Edwards Lifesciences Ltd. #1 27 March 2020 NIPC Law and Patents – Evalve Inc. and Others v Edwards Lifesciences Ltd. #2 30 March 2020.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 20th June 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

A spotlight on patent injunctions – Technology Law Update

Posted June 19th, 2020 in chambers articles, injunctions, intellectual property, news, patents by sally

‘Owners of patent portfolios will be aware of how patent infringement claims and attacks on patent validity often interact.’

Full Story

Technology Law Update, 18th June 2020

Source: www.technology-law-blog.co.uk

Damages Awards in the IPEC Small Claims Track – NIPC Law

Posted June 18th, 2020 in damages, enforcement, intellectual property, news, small claims by sally

‘”IPEC SCT” stands for “Intellectual Property Enterprise Court Small Claims Track. This is a tribunal for IP claims under £10,000 other than those involving patents, registered and registered Community designs, plant varieties and semiconductor topographies.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 17th June 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Patents – Neurim Pharmaceuticals v Mylan – NIPC Law

Posted June 5th, 2020 in appeals, damages, injunctions, intellectual property, medicines, news, patents by sally

‘This was an application by Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd. (“Neurim”), the registered proprietor of European patent (UK) number 1441702 and Flynn Pharma Ltd. (“Flynn”) the proprietor’s exclusive licensee for an interim injunction to restrain until trial or further order the generics manufacturer, Mylan, from taking steps that might infringe that patent. The application was heard online by Mr Justice Marcus Smith on 20 May 2020. He handed down his judgment on 3 June 2020.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 4th June 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Eureka moment? Law firms report rush to patent ideas amid UK lockdown – The Guardian

Posted May 27th, 2020 in coronavirus, intellectual property, law firms, news, patents by sally

‘Intellectual property lawyers report increased demand for services during Covid-19 crisis.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 24th May 2020

Source: www.theguardian.com

A patent problem in the global antiviral race? – Counsel

‘Foreign patents could prevent UK citizens accessing treatment for COVID-19, warns Professor Mark Engelman.’

Full Story

Counsel, May 2020

Source: www.counselmagazine.co.uk

High Court clarifies ‘bad faith’ trade mark rules – Law Society’s Gazette

‘Businesses will need to avoid scattergun approaches to registering trade marks following an eagerly awaited High Court ruling. In Sky plc v SkyKick UK Ltd, Lord Justice Arnold ruled that a software company had infringed a trade mark of broadcaster Sky – but strongly criticised Sky for filing trade mark applications as a weapon. IP experts said the ruling would significantly change trade mark practice.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 30th April 2020

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Trade Marks and Passing Off – Planetart v Photobox – NIPC Law

Posted April 14th, 2020 in intellectual property, news, trade marks by sally

‘This was an action for trade mark infringement. passing off and invalidation of one of the defendant’s trade marks. The claimants were the Delaware company, Planetart LLC, and its English subsidiary, Planetart Ltd. Those companies offer a photo printing service called FreePrints that is best explained in the How it Works video on the home page of their website. The defendants, Photobox Ltd. and Photobox Free Prints Ltd. offer a service that is similar to the claimants’.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 11th April 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Trade Mark Infringement and Passing off – Natural Instinct Ltd v Natures Menu Ltd – NIPC Law

Posted April 9th, 2020 in intellectual property, news, trade marks by sally

‘This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off between two medium-sized enterprises. Mr David Stone sitting as an Enterprise Judge heard 9 witnesses on 13 and 14 Feb and delivered judgment on 20 March 2020. The costs that the losing party will be ordered to pay to the successful party will be capped at £50,000. It is it an example of how an intellectual property dispute should be resolved. Save that the Wood Green County Court’s jurisdiction had been limited to patents snd designs when it opened, this is probably just the sort of case that Sir Derek Oulton would have had in mind when he recommended the establishment of patents country courts in 1986.’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 8th April 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Bayer v NHS Darlington Appeal – NIPC Law

‘This was an appeal by Bayer Plc and Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited against Mrs Justice Whipple’s judgment in Bayer Plc v NHS Darlington Clinical Commissioning Groups and others : [2019] PTSR 922, [2018] WLR(D) 589, [2018] EWHC 2465 (Admin) which I blogged in Bayer Plc v NHS Darlington CCG and Others 2 Oct 2018. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Whipple dismissed applications for judicial review by Bayer and Novartis of a decision by NHS Darlington and other Clinical Commissioning Groups in Northeast England that the NHS Trusts from which they commission services should use a drug called Avastin as the preferred treatment option for an eye disease generally referred to as wet age-related macular degeneration (“WAMD”).’

Full Story

NIPC Law, 7th April 2020

Source: nipclaw.blogspot.com

Virtual case begins as court rejects trial on papers – Litigation Futures

‘The High Court yesterday adjourned an upcoming trial, saying that the guidance on the coronavirus pandemic did not allow it to take place on the papers.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 26th March 2020

Source: www.litigationfutures.com