R (on the application of Hodkin and another) (Appellants) v Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages (Respondent) – Supreme Court
Supreme Court, 11th December 2013
Supreme Court, 11th December 2013
Abdullahi v Bundesasylamt (Case C-394/12); [2013] WLR (D) 481
‘According to article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 (establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the member states by a third-country national (OJ 2003 L50, p 1)), in circumstances where a member state had agreed to take charge of an applicant for asylum on the basis of the criterion laid down in article 10(1) of the Regulation—namely, as the member state of the first entry of the applicant for asylum into the European Union—the only way in which the applicant could call into question the choice of that criterion was by pleading systemic deficiencies in the asylum procedure and in the conditions for the reception of applicants for asylum in that member state, which provided substantial grounds for believing that the applicant for asylum would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.’
WLR Daily, 10th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Where, in a case involving alleged breaches of rights under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Court of Appeal was faced with a conflict between decisions of the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights, the court could in appropriate circumstances dismiss the appeal and grant permission to appeal to the Supreme Court to resolve the conflict between the domestic law and that of the European Court, without hearing argument or expressing its views on the case.’
WLR Daily, 9th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Where a local authority had assessed a child present in their area to be a child in need the power to provide services to that child under section 17(1)(b) of the Children Act 1989 was capable of being exercised outside the area of the local authority and at a time when the child himself was outside their area but still within England and Wales.’
WLR Daily, 6th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘The Secretary of State for the Home Department had power to detain in hospital an immigration detainee pending his removal from the United Kingdom and such power was not limited to a person detained under section 48 of the Mental Health Act 1983. The Secretary of State’s policy on detention allowed for the removal to hospital of a detainee whose serious medical condition could not be treated in the detention centre and did not require that he be released from detention in order to receive medical treatment.’
WLR Daily, 5th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
In re Corey [2013] UKSC 76; [2013] WLR (D) 479
‘A High Court judge in Northern Ireland, having found that a review by parole commissioners of a life sentence prisoner’s recall to prison from his release on licence had been conducted unfairly and in breach of article 4.5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, was not entitled to exercise the court’s inherent jurisdiction so as to order the prisoner’s release on bail pending a re-hearing of the review.’
WLR Daily, 4th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
J & Ors, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 2287 (05 December 2013)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Bank St Petersburg & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Anor [2013] EWHC 3674 (Ch) (06 December 2013)
High Court (Commercial Court)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
J G Walker Groundworks Ltd v Priory Homes (East) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3723 (TCC) (06 December 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Swan Housing Association Ltd v Gill [2013] EWCA Civ 1566 (09 December 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Kagalovsky & Anor v Balmore Invest Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 3876 (QB) (09 December 2013)
AXA Insurance UK Plc v Rossiter [2013] EWHC 3805 (QB) (05 December 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Baturina v Chistyakov [2013] EWHC 3537 (Comm) (14 November 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Mba v Merton London Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1562; [2013] WLR (D) 474
‘A provision put in place by a council care home requiring a worker who was a Christian whose genuine belief that Sunday was a day of worship and rest to work on Sundays as rostered discriminated against the worker but was a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of running the care home effectively.’
WLR Daily, 5th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Smith v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2013] EWCA Civ 1585; [2013] WLR (D) 473
‘In order for the court to have jurisdiction to make an order under CPR r 31.16 for disclosure before proceedings had started, it was not a requirement that the applicant have an arguable case in those proceedings.’
WLR Daily, 5th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Paragraph 120B of Appendix A to the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules did not require that an academic institution accepting students from abroad for continuing studies under the points based system should expressly state that a proposed course constituted academic progress. The mere issue of a certificate of acceptance for studies constituted an assertion to that effect.’
WLR Daily, 5th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Nordecon AS and another v Rahandusministeerium (Case C-561/12); [2013] WLR (D) 470
‘Article 30(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC did not allow a contracting authority to negotiate with tenderers tenders that did not comply with the mandatory requirements laid down in the technical specifications of the contract as published.’
WLR Daily, 5th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘The current process for assessing eligibility for employment and support allowance by way of a questionnaire and face-to-face interview placed mental health patients at a substantial disadvantage compared with other claimants. The Secretary of State therefore was under a duty under the Equality Act 2010 to make a reasonable adjustment to accommodate them.’
WLR Daily, 4th December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
HTC Corpn v Nokia Corpn: [2013] EWHC 3778 (Pat); [2013] WLR (D) 468
‘The criteria to be applied in deciding whether or not to grant an injunction for infringement of intellectual property rights were those of efficacy, proportionality, dissuasiveness, the avoidance of creating barriers to legitimate trade and the provision of safeguards against abuse as set out in article 3(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/48/EC.’
WLR Daily, 3rd December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Rayner v Legal Services Commission: [2013] WLR (D) 467
‘On a proper reading of the words “attributable to” in paragraph 5(4) of the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000 the non-funded party could recover costs outside the funded period, provided that the causal link was established.’
WLR Daily, 2nd December 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd: [2013] EWCA Civ 1537; [2013] WLR (D) 466
‘In the context of the court’s case management powers in respect of a party’s claim, the failure by the party to file a costs budget on time would not normally attract relief from the sanction imposed by CPR r 3.14 unless the default were trivial or there were a good reason for it.’
WLR Daily, 27th November 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Supreme Court
Martin Corey, Re for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2013] UKSC 76 (4 December 2013)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Khan & Ors v R [2013] EWCA Crim 2230 (04 December 2013)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Roberts v Hook & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 1564 (04 December 2013)
Harrison & Ors v Technical Sign Company Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1569 (04 December 2013)
EU Plants Ltd v Wokingham Borough Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1542 (04 December 2013)
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 1565 (04 December 2013)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Rosenzweig v NMC Recordings Ltd [2013] EWHC 3792 (Ch) (04 December 2013)
Palmer & Harvey McLane Ltd v Garrad & Anor [2013] EWHC 3810 (Ch) (04 December 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Robinson, R (on the application of) v HMP Whatton & Anor [2013] EWHC 3777 (Admin) (04 December 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
Supreme Court, 4th December 2013
In the matter of KL (A Child) [2013] UKSC 75 | UKSC 2013/0212 (YouTube)
Supreme Court, 4th December 2013