‘The question as to whether a complainant was a consumer for the purposes of the Financial Conduct Authority’s compulsory jurisdiction dispute resolution rules was a matter of precedent fact to be decided by the courts; it was not a question for Financial Ombudsman Service to determine that was reviewable only on conventional (“Wednesbury”) grounds.’
WLR Daily, 20th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Halahan v R [2014] EWCA Crim 2079 (24 October 2014)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Aster Healthcare Ltd v Shafi (The Estate of) [2014] EWCA Civ 1350 (24 October 2014)
Morris v Blackpool Borough Council & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1384 (24 October 2014)
K v The Hospital Managers of the Kingswood Centre & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1332 (23 October 2014)
HTC Corporation v Gemalto SA [2014] EWCA Civ 1335 (22 October 2014)
Rees & Anor v Gateley Wareing (a firm) & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1351 (22 October 2014)
Foster & Anor v Action Aviation Ltd & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1368 (23 October 2014)
Sunrise Brokers LLP v Rodgers [2014] EWCA Civ 1373 (23 October 2014)
Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Ltd (Rev 1) [2014] EWCA Civ 1382 (22 October 2014)
G (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1365 (22 October 2014)
Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2014] EWCA Civ 1383 (22 October 2014)
Source: www.bailii.org
Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1383; [2014] WLR (D) 437
‘For the purposes of section 208 of the Housing Act 1996, when deciding whether it was “reasonably practicable” to accommodate a particular homeless person within its own district, bearing in mind that the accommodation might be of no more than a temporary nature, a local housing authority was entitled to have regard to all the factors that had a bearing on its ability to provide accommodation to that person, including the demands made on its resources, whether of a financial or administrative nature.’
WLR Daily, 22nd October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Further guidance on the approach to a “streamlined” process to deal with all deprivation of liberty (“DoL”) cases in a timely but just and fair way which was compliant with article 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.’
WLR Daily, 16th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Where an applicant applied to the Secretary of State only for definite leave to remain, pursuant to section 3(1)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971, but made no request for indefinite leave to remain, and provided no material in support of the application specifically directed at an application for indefinite leave to remain, or which pointed to any disadvantage associated with the grant of discretionary leave to remain as opposed to indefinite leave to remain, the Secretary of State had no positive duty to consider what might support the granting of indefinite leave to remain.’
WLR Daily, 16th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
UZ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 1319; [2014] WLR (D) 429
‘The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) did not have jurisdiction to determine an application for permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review where the application had been advanced by reference to the Secretary of State’s decisions to reject the application under the Legacy Programme.’
WLR Daily, 15th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Vice Prosecutor, Magistrate of the Judicial Order, France v Charbit [2014] WLR (D) 425
‘An annex could not form part of a European arrest warrant for the purposes of section 2 of the Extradition Act 2003.’
WLR Daily, 14th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘Once a district judge’s decision to order a person’s extradition had been successfully appealed under Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003, the High Court enjoyed a supervisory jurisdiction to quash or vary any costs order made against the appellant, since the basis on which the costs order had been made no longer existed. However, the High Court did not have jurisdiction to determine an appeal from a costs order made by a district judge who had ordered extradition, in circumstances where the costs order was challenged as a part of unsuccessfully pursuing an appeal against the extradition order.’
WLR Daily, 10th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘A conclusion of lawful killing made by a coroner’s court meant that a death was recognised as one that would amount to the crime of murder, manslaughter or infanticide but for the presence of an additional factor which justified it.’
WLR Daily, 14th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘The High Court had jurisdiction to appoint a provisional liquidator notwithstanding the fact that appeals by the company in respect of disputed VAT assessments were pending in the First-tier Tax Tribunal.’
WLR Daily, 16th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘The rule that a fraudulent insurance claim deprived the insured of any right to recover anything applied also to fraudulent devices, namely, the making of statements which were known by the insured to be untrue or which were made recklessly, not caring whether they were true or false, in support of a claim honestly believed by him to be good both as to liability and amount.’
WLR Daily, 16th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Scott (Appellant) v Southern Pacific Mortgages Limited (Respondents) [2014] UKSC 52 (YouTube)
Supreme Court, 22nd October 2014
Supreme Court, 22nd October 2014
Supreme Court, 22nd October 2014
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Foran v R [2014] EWCA Crim 2047 (17 October 2014)
Clark & Anor v R [2014] EWCA Crim 1973 (17 October 2014)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Cotton & Anor v Brudenell-Bruce & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1312 (17 October 2014)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Davies v London Borough of Haringey [2014] EWHC 3393 (QB) (17 October 2014)
County Motor Works (Chelmsford) Ltd v PBFW Ltd [2014] EWHC 3392 (QB) (17 October 2014)
Worldspreads Ltd v Foley [2014] EWHC 3382 (QB) (17 October 2014)
Boylin v The Christie NHS Foundation [2014] EWHC 3363 (QB) (17 October 2014)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Redstone Mortgages Ltd v B Legal Ltd [2014] EWHC 3398 (Ch) (17 October 2014)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Lochailort Investments Ltd v Secretary of State [2014] EWHC 3358 (Admin) (16 October 2014)
High Court (Family Division)
DM, Re [2014] EWHC 3119 (Fam) (29 September 2014)
Olaribiro v Shoyemi [2014] EWHC 3365 (Fam) (09 October 2014)
Newman (Number 2) [2014] EWHC 3399 (Fam) (17 October 2014)
Kirklees Council v Re [2014] EWHC 3182 (Fam) (03 October 2014)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Sugar Hut Group & Ors v A J Insurance [2014] EWHC 3352 (Comm) (20 October 2014)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Horne v Magna Design Building Ltd [2014] EWHC 3380 (TCC) (17 October 2014)
Source: www.bailii.org
Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and another: [2014] EWHC 3322 (Ch); [2014] WLR (D) 424
‘Communications made at a time when there was no dispute could not, with retrospective effect, be made subject to the without prejudice privilege by subsequently rasing a dispute.
WLR Daily, 10th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘All those subject to the Detained Fast Track policy, operated by the Secretary of State, for the detention of some asylum seekers while their asylum claims were being determined would now have four clear working days from allocation of a lawyer to substantive interview.’
WLR Daily, 9th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
‘It was very difficult for the Court of Appeal to deal with the dispatch of its business if it was faced with excessively lengthy skeleton arguments. What was required was a careful and concise summary of the points that were intended to be addressed.’
WLR Daily, 13th October 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
Court of appeal (Civil Division)
Exsus Travel Ltd & Ors v Turner & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1331 (16 October 2014)
The Woodland Trust v Loring & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1314 (16 October 2014)
Southwell v Blackburn [2014] EWCA Civ 1347 (16 October 2014)
IOT Engineering Projects Ltd v Dangote Fertilizer Ltd & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1348 (16 October 2014)
Ali v Caton & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1313 (15 October 2014)
UZ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 1319 (15 October 2014)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Antoine v R [2014] EWCA Crim 1971 (15 October 2014)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Marsden v Crown Prosecution Service [2014] EWHC 3359 (Admin) (16 October 2014)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Parkwell Investments Ltd v Wilson & Anor [2014] EWHC 3381 (Ch) (16 October 2014)
Hague Plant Ltd v Hague& Ors [2014] EWHC 3383 (Ch) (16 October 2014)
Ghassemian v Tigris Industries Inc [2014] EWHC 3362 (Ch) (15 October 2014)
High Court (Family Division)
London Borough of Barking & Dagenham v SS [2014] EWHC 3338 (Fam) (15 October 2014)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Otkritie International Investment Management & Ors v Urumov [2014] EWCA Civ 1315 (14 October 2014)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) (14 October 2014)
Gadd, R v [2014] EWHC 3307 (QB) (10 October 2014)
CF v The Ministry of Defence & Ors [2014] EWHC 3171 (QB) (14 October 2014)
ABC v DEF [2014] EWHC 3346 (QB) (14 October 2014)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd & Anor [2014] EWHC 3316 (Ch) (13 October 2014)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Family Division)
K v D [2014] EWHC 3188 (Fam) (26 September 2014)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Wood v Sureterm Direct Ltd & Anor [2014] EWHC 3240 (Comm) (14 October 2014)
Source: www.bailii.org
© Inner Temple Library 2026