UK governments blocked investigations into Malaysian massacre cover-up – The Guardian

Posted November 27th, 2013 in appeals, armed forces, colonies, government departments, homicide, inquiries, news, police by tracey

‘British governments blocked two police investigations into the covering up of the killing by British troops of 24 unarmed rubber plantation workers during counterinsurgency operations in Malaysia nearly 65 years ago, the appeal court heard on Tuesday.’

Full story

The Guardian, 26th November 2013

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Regina (Ignaoua) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2013 in appeals, immigration, judicial review, law reports, legislation, regulations, ultra vires by tracey

Regina (Ignaoua) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2013] EWCA Civ 1498; [2013] WLR (D) 451

‘New certification provisions introduced in 2013, in so far as they purported to empower the Home Secretary automatically to terminate any existing proceedings for judicial review of a direction excluding the claimant from the United Kingdom on national security grounds, were outside the powers conferred by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 as amended.’

WLR Daily, 21st November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Anwar v Same; Alam v Same – WLR Daily

Posted November 26th, 2013 in appeals, human rights, immigration, law reports, Supreme Court, tribunals by tracey

Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Anwar v Same; Alam v Same: [2013] UKSC 72; [2013] WLR (D)  450

‘The Home Secretary was not under a duty to issue a direction for removal from the United Kingdom at the same time as refusing an application for an extension of limited leave to remain in the United Kingdom. A tribunal hearing an immigration appeal against a refusal of further leave to remain in the United Kingdom may consider additional grounds which had not been raised before the Home Secretary before the decision under appeal had been made but which had subsequently been raised in response to a one stop notice.’

WLR Daily, 20th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

‘Close to death’ hunger striker faces imminent deportation after court defeat – The Independent

Posted November 26th, 2013 in appeals, asylum, demonstrations, deportation, detention, immigration, news by tracey

‘A man who is “close to death” after being on hunger strike in immigration detention for three months could be sent back to Nigeria on Wednesday after his case failed in the Court of Appeal.’

Full story

The Independent, 25th November 2013

Source: www.independent.co.uk

The Court of Appeal on Cartels and Conflicts – Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers

Posted November 25th, 2013 in appeals, competition, conflict of laws, damages, jurisdiction, news by tracey

‘The Court of Appeal handed down two important decisions last week on the application of conflict of law principles to cartel follow-on damages claims: Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors v Morgan Advanced Materials plc & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1484 and Ryanair Limited v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450. The defendants in each case challenged the jurisdiction of the English courts to hear damages claims arising from their cartel activities.’

Full story

Competition Bulletin from Blackstone Chambers, 24th November 2013

Source: www.competitionbulletin.com

APPGER in the Upper Tribunal – Panopticon

Posted November 25th, 2013 in appeals, freedom of information, human rights, news, rendition, tribunals by tracey

‘The Upper Tribunal has finally handed down its judgment in All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition v IC & Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2013] UKUT 560 (AAC). It is a judgment of Charles and Burnett JJ and Judge Wikeley. The appeal was from an FTT judgment which is analysed in detail by Rachel Kamm here. That post also contains the background to the case. In essence, the request was made by the APPGER for information relating to the participation of the UK in the practice of extraordinary rendition.’

Full story

Panopticon, 22nd November 2013

Source: www.panopticonblog.com

Rivals can create copycat software through testing developers’ software and interpreting their user manuals, rules UK court – OUT-LAW.com

Posted November 25th, 2013 in appeals, computer programs, copyright, news by tracey

‘Businesses can replicate the way a rivals’ computer program operates by interpreting how it functions from reading user manuals or other accompanying documents their rivals produce without infringing copyright, the Court of Appeal has ruled.’

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 22nd November 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

More children and housing duties – NearlyLegal

Posted November 25th, 2013 in appeals, children, disabled persons, housing, judicial review, local government, news by tracey

‘This was an an application for permission to appeal a judicial review decision on the interrelation of s.17 Children Act 1989, s.11 Children Act 2004 and the Housing Act 1996 parts 6 and 7.’

Full story

NearlyLegal, 24th November 2013

Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/

The Upper Tribunal’s first consideration of monetary penalty notices by Julian Milford – Panopticon

Posted November 22nd, 2013 in appeals, data protection, fines, hospitals, news, penalties, tribunals by tracey

‘Upper Tribunal has just issued judgment in Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust v Information Commissioner [2013] UKUT 0551. This significant decision is the first time the Upper Tribunal has considered an appeal against a monetary penalty notice (“MPN”), issued by the Commissioner under section 55A Data Protection Act 1998 (“DPA”).’

Full story

Panopticon, 21st November 2013

Source: www.panopticonblog.com

Court of Appeal backs parallel UK and EPO patent proceedings but alters guidelines for future cases – OUT-LAW.com

‘A dispute over the alleged infringement of a standard-essential mobile technology European patent will be ruled on by the High Court despite there being ongoing proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO) about whether the patent is valid.’

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 21st November 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania v Bucnys (Antonov intervening); Sakalis v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania (Same intervening); Lavrov v Ministry of Justice, Estonia (Same intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted November 22nd, 2013 in appeals, EC law, extradition, government departments, law reports, Supreme Court, warrants by tracey

Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania v Bucnys (Antonov intervening); Sakalis v Ministry of Justice, Republic of Lithuania (Same intervening); Lavrov v Ministry of Justice, Estonia (Same intervening): [2013] UKSC 71;   [2013] WLR (D)  446

‘A European arrest warrant issued by a government ministry in respect of a convicted person with a view to his or her arrest and extradition could be regarded as issued by a judicial authority for the purposes of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA— and Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003 which gave effect to it in the United Kingdom— if the ministry had only issued the warrant at the request of and by way of endorsement of a decision that the issue of such a warrant was appropriate made by the court responsible for the sentence or some other person or body properly regarded as a judicial authority responsible for its execution. A ministry which had power to issue an European arrest warrant of its own motion and had done so, or which had issued a warrant at the request of a non-judicial authority, including an executive agency such as a prison department, could not be regarded as a judicial authority for those purposes.’

WLR Daily, 20th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina (London Christian Radio Ltd and another) v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre

Posted November 22nd, 2013 in advertising, appeals, Christianity, law reports, media by tracey

Regina (London Christian Radio Ltd and another) v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre:[2013] EWCA Civ 1495;   [2013] WLR (D)  445

‘The words “an advertisement which is directed towards a political end”, in section 321(2)(b) of the Communications Act 2003, invited attention to the subject-matter of the advertisement, and not the motives and intentions of the advertiser unless those intentions were expressed or were implicit in the language of the advertisement itself. An objective examination of the text of the advertisement alone was required, and the word “political” should not be given a narrow and artificially restrictive interpretation given the wide scope of the examples provided in section 321(3).’

WLR Daily, 19th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

 

Hunger striker Isa Muazu loses release bid – The Independent

Posted November 22nd, 2013 in appeals, demonstrations, detention, immigration, news by tracey

‘A hunger striker who is “near death” has failed to win temporary freedom pending his appeal court challenge to being held in an immigration detention centre.’

Full story

The Independent, 21st November 2013

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Patel & Others (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Anwar (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Alam (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) – Supreme Court

Posted November 21st, 2013 in appeals, human rights, immigration, law reports, Supreme Court, tribunals by sally

Patel & Others (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Anwar (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent); Alam (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 72 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 20th November 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Sakalis (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice, Lithuania (Respondent); Lavrov (Respondent) v Ministry of Justice, Estonia (Appellant); Bucnys (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice, Lithuania (Respondent) – Supreme Court

Posted November 21st, 2013 in appeals, extradition, government departments, law reports, Supreme Court, warrants by sally

Sakalis (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice, Lithuania (Respondent); Lavrov (Respondent) v Ministry of Justice, Estonia (Appellant); Bucnys (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice, Lithuania (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 71 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 20th November 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Regina v Sakalauskas – WLR Daily

Posted November 20th, 2013 in appeals, energy, fraud, law reports by sally

Regina v Sakalauskas [2013] WLR (D) 442

“‘Any article’ in section 6(1) of the Fraud Act 2006 meant any article the defendant had with him for the purpose or intention of using in the course of or in connection with any fraud and use necessarily related to use in the future and not articles which had been used in the past.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Aspinalls Club Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs – WLR Daily

Posted November 20th, 2013 in appeals, gambling, law reports, taxation, tribunals by sally

Aspinalls Club Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs 2013 EWCA Civ 1464; [2013] WLR (D) 441

“For the purposes of section 11 of the Finance Act 1997, when calculating the ‘gross gaming yield’ from gaming taking place on a gaming club’s premises, commissions and rebates paid and allowed by the gambling club to its customers under incentive schemes there were not to be taken into account as reducing the amount of ‘banker’s profits’ from dutiable gaming.”

WLR Daily, 15th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina v Fields and others – WLR Daily

Regina v Fields and others [2013] EWCA Crim 2042; [2013] WLR (D) 440

“In a joint benefit case, where each defendant was found to have obtained the joint benefit, he was not required by a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to disgorge benefit he had not obtained and a confiscation order made in the amount matching the correctly assessed benefit, was not disproportionate.”

WLR Daily, 14th November 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Inheritance Act Claims – Delay at your Peril – Zenith Chambers

Posted November 19th, 2013 in appeals, delay, divorce, news, time limits, wills by sally

“Nicola Phillipson, Zenith Chambers, examines the case of Berger v Berger where the Court of Appeal refused permission to the appellant to bring a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 almost six years out of time.”

Full story

Zenith Chambers, 5th November 2013

Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk

Boys will be boys…. But you can’t sue the school for it by Elliot Kay – Zenith Chambers

Posted November 19th, 2013 in appeals, children, education, news, personal injuries, school children by sally

“On 9th June 2010, Lewis Pierce, a 9 year old schoolboy at the time, was playing with his younger brother George in their school playground. There was a metal water fountain fixed to the external wall of the school which could be accessed from the playground. In the course of play George sprayed his elder brother with water from the fountain, causing Lewis to swing a punch at George. George was able to evade the punch but as a result Lewis connected with the water fountain, causing lacerations to his right thumb and damage to his tendons. Lewis made a good recovery from the injuries sustained.”

Full story

Zenith Chambers, 28th October 2013

Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk