Geraldine Morris looks at the changes ahead for family law & predicts some new developments – New Law Journal

‘Lawyers may not always think of themselves as business people; family lawyers in particular are often very client focused, looking to achieve the best outcome for parties who are going through what will often be one of the worst periods of their lives. It can be hard, when weighed down with a busy caseload, to peak above the parapet and take time to reflect on how family law is changing. All businesses change over time, some faster than others. Change within the family law justice system has accelerated at an incredible pace in the last few years and 2014 will be no exception.’

Full story

New Law Journal, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk

R (on the application of HS2 Action Alliance Limited) (Appellant) v The Secretary of State for Transport and another (Respondents); R (on the application of Heathrow Hub Limited and another) (Appellants) v The Secretary of State for Transport and another (Respondents); R (on the application of Buckinghamshire County Council and others) (Appellants) v The Secretary of State for Transport (Respondent) – Supreme Court

R (on the application of HS2 Action Alliance Limited) (Appellant) v The Secretary of State for Transport and another (Respondents) UKSC 2013/0172; R (on the application of Heathrow Hub Limited and another) (Appellants) v The Secretary of State for Transport and another (Respondents) UKSC 2013/0173; R (on the application of Buckinghamshire County Council and others) (Appellants) v The Secretary of State for Transport (Respondent) UKSC 2013/0187

Supreme Court, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Marley (Appellant) v Rawlings and another (Respondents) – Supreme Court

Posted January 23rd, 2014 in appeals, law reports, mistake, rectification, solicitors, Supreme Court, wills by sally

Marley (Appellant) v Rawlings and another (Respondents) [2014] UKSC 2 | UKSC 2012/0057 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Attorney General “warned LSB about regulatory creep” but indicates no roll-back of Clementi – Legal Futures

‘The Attorney General has warned about the “danger” of regulators micro-managing the legal profession, but also indicated that the government is unlikely to roll back the Clementi reforms that led to the creation of independent regulators.’

Full story

Legal Futures, 23rd January 2014

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

In Conversation with Joshua Rozenberg – LSE

Posted January 23rd, 2014 in media, news, solicitors by sally

‘Joshua Rozenberg is Britain’s best-known commentator on the law. In 2012 he was included by The Times in its independently-judged list of the UK’s 100 most influential lawyers, the only journalist to feature in the Times Law 100.’

Video (YouTube)

LSE, 16th January 2014

Source: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/events

Royal wedding protesters lose court appeal against Metropolitan Police – The Independent

Posted January 23rd, 2014 in appeals, demonstrations, news, police, stop and search by sally

‘Republican activists who protested at the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton lost a legal appeal on Wednesday, against a ruling on the conduct of the Metropolitan Police.’

Full story

The Independent, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Marital coercion defence ‘to be scrapped’ – BBC News

Posted January 23rd, 2014 in bills, defences, harassment, married persons, news by sally

‘The historical defence of marital coercion is to be abolished in England and Wales, the government has said.’

Full story

BBC News, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Terror controls explained – Daily Telegraph

Posted January 23rd, 2014 in news, terrorism, terrorism prevention & investigation measures by sally

‘Tpim controls on seven terror suspects expire this month, but what are they?’

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 23rd January 2014

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

HS2 Action Alliance Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor [2014] UKSC 3 (22 January 2014)

Marley v Rawlings & Anor [2014] UKSC 2 (22 January 2014)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Topland Portfolio No. 1 Ltd v Smiths News Trading Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 18 (21 January 2014)

Lewis & Ors v R [2014] EWCA Crim 48 (21 January 2014)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Hicks & Ors, R (on the application of) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 3 (22 January 2014)

Bolton & Ors v St Anselm Development Company Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 27 (22 January 2014)

B (A Child), Re [2014] EWCA Civ 19 (21 January 2014)

Price & Anor v Davis & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 26 (21 January 2014)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

M A Lloyd & Sons Ltd (t/a KPM Marine) v PPC International Ltd (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2014] EWHC 41 (QB) (20 January 2014)

Ecclestone v Khyami [2014] EWHC 29 (QB) (20 January 2014)

Webb Resolutions Ltd v E-Surv Ltd [2014] EWHC 49 (QB) (20 January 2014)

High Court (Administrative Court)

KS v The City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2014] EWHC 11 (Admin) (10 January 2014)

Halite Energy Group Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2014] EWHC 17 (Admin) (17 January 2014)

O v Secretary of State for Education & Anor [2014] EWHC 22 (Admin) (17 January 2014)

Source: www.bailii.org

Swimming against the tide of good faith – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in contracts, news by sally

‘It is largely accepted that English contract law does not acknowledge a general duty to perform in good faith. In support of this proposition most commentators refer to Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989] QB 433, CA, in which Bingham LJ (as he then was) spoke of the lack of any overriding legal principle of good faith, in the following terms:

“In many civil law systems, and perhaps in most legal systems outside the common law world, the law of obligations recognises and enforces an overriding principle that in making and carrying out contracts parties should act in good faith. This does not simply mean that they should not deceive each other, a principle which any legal system must recognise; its effect is perhaps most aptly conveyed by such metaphorical colloquialisms as “playing fair,” “coming clean” or “putting one’s cards face upwards on the table.” It is in essence a principle of fair and open dealing… English law has, characteristically, committed itself to no such overriding principle but has developed piecemeal solutions in response to demonstrated problems of unfairness.”’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 14th January 2014

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

Habitual Residence – the state of mind of the child – the Supreme Court advances the ‘increasing recognition of children as people with a part to play in their own lives, rather than as passive recipients of their parents’ decision.’ – Sovereign Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in appeals, children, news, residence orders, Supreme Court by sally

‘In relation to an adolescent child, is the state of mind of the child relevant to whether or not habitual residence has been acquired in the place where the child is living?’

Full story

Sovereign Chambers, 20th January 2014

Source: www.sovereignchambers.co.uk

Obtaining a defendant’s insurance details – Hardwicke Chambers

‘In XYZ v Various [2013] EWHC 3648, Mrs Justice Thirlwall is managing group litigation in which nearly 1000 women seek damages from companies running hospitals for supplying them with defective implants manufactured by the French company, PIP, for use in breast implant surgery. Some of the claimants also bring actions against the providers of credit cards pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1984 (as amended by the 2006 Act) and some bring actions against the surgeons who carried out the surgery. The total value of the claims is in the region of £13m plus costs on both sides. The court has held a number of case management hearings culminating finally in a timetable leading to trial in October 2014 on three issues in four sample cases in which Transform Medical Group (CS) Ltd (“Transform”) is, effectively, the lead defendant.’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 13th January 2014

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

Another one bites the dust – life post Jackson and “Mitchell” – Sovereign Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in appeals, civil procedure rules, disclosure, news, sanctions by sally

‘This is an important case on the question of the correct approach where there has been default in respect of a sanction imposed by the court under the new “post- Jackson” regime, both in terms of the appropriate structure of applications for relief against sanctions. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the deputy high court judge and refused to entertain a second application for relief against sanctions where a previous judge had ordered that the defence and counterclaim be struck out.
The history of litigation and orders is slightly complex but has to be understood.’

Full story

Sovereign Chambers, 20th January 2014

Source: www.sovereignchambers.co.uk

Judge warns jury of wrongful prejudice over defendant’s Muslim face veil – The Guardian

‘A judge warned a jury on Wednesday that it was wrong to be prejudiced against anyone because of their expression of religious faith, as a Muslim defendant prepared to go on trial wearing a full face veil.’

Full story

The Guardian, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Thank the Lords! – Sovereign Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in ASBOs, bills, injunctions, news, nuisance, parliament by sally

‘If last Wednesday’s vote in the House of Lords was not a reminder as to why we need a second house to protect us then nothing will be. Many members of the public will not realise just how close this country came to fundamentally damaging the democratic society we live in and abandoning the principle of free speech, whilst simultaneously providing an unwieldy weapon against practically anybody for doing pretty much anything that another person does not like.’

Full story

Sovereign Chambers, 15th January 2014

Source: www.sovereignchambers.co.uk

How long do I have? – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in appeals, arbitration, contracts, limitations, news, restitution by sally

‘Until recently it was unclear how long a party who lost in an adjudication, and had to pay money to the winning party, had to bring a subsequent claim for recovery of those monies. The position has recently been resolved by the Court of Appeal in the case of Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction Plc [2013] EWCA Civ 1541 but the discussion had started earlier with the case of Jim Ennis Construction Ltd v Premier Asphalt Ltd [2009] EWHC 1906 (TCC).’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 15th January 2014

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

Law and Democracy – Six Pump Court

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in courts, criminal justice, news by sally

‘The basis of the English criminal law is to protect property. An illustration of this fundamental principle of English jurisprudence was enshrined most notoriously in the Black Act of the eighteenth century which was introduced in an atmosphere of considerable social disquiet by the ruling classes in order to quell the unrest directed at the chattels and property of the ruling classes and which was perceived at that time as a challenge to the then social order.’

Full story (Word)

Six Pump Court, 16th January 2014

Source: www.6pumpcourt.co.uk

Mitchell Part Two: a practical view from the Bar – Littleton Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in appeals, case management, civil procedure rules, delay, news, sanctions by sally

‘In his monthly column, James Bickford Smith discusses Durrant v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary [2013] EWCA Civ 1624 in which the Court of Appeal, after its decision in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, took further eye-catching steps to impose the new approach to relief from sanctions.’

Full story

Littleton Chambers, 8th January 2014

Source: www.littletonchambers.com

Court’s permission needed to extend time for service of witness statements – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in agreements, civil procedure rules, courts, news, service, time limits, witnesses by sally

‘In almost every litigated case the parties usually find themselves needing to vary the dates of some directions. This can be done by way of written agreement between the parties and is allowed by CPR 2.11.’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 22nd January 2014

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

“I read it in the newspaper”: The current spate of ancillary relief negligence claims raising near identical section 14A arguments – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted January 22nd, 2014 in financial provision, limitations, negligence, news, pensions, valuation by sally

‘In ancillary relief proceedings, the largest assets are frequently the divorcing couple’s matrimonial home and pension rights. Whilst it is usually straightforward to ascertain the value of the former, accurately achieving this for the latter can be a highly technical exercise. Solicitors’ alleged failure to analyse pension transfer values is the subject of a spate of negligence claims currently being brought by former clients. No case is yet to be reported, but it is expected that a number will be during 2014.’

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 13th January 2014

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk