Regina v N; Regina v D; Regina v L

Court of Appeal

“The drafting of an indictment required close attention to the realities of the case and none at all to the theoretical legal possibilities which might arise. It also required careful attention to the criminality which had resulted in the case coming to trial, and to the evidence to support the allegation, the avoidance of duplication and the risk of unnecessary complications for both the jury and the judge and the ultimate wasting of scarce and valuable resources.”

The Times, 11th May 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Online Catering Ltd v Acton and Another

Court of Appeal

“The bills of sale Acts did not apply to companies. Accordingly, a party would not succeed in establishing that a contract was unenforceable for want of registration under those Acts if the relevant contracting party was a company.”

The Times, 11th May 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council

Queen’s Bench Division

“Section 3 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.”

The Times, 11th May 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Court of Appeal

“In awarding exemplary damages in respect of oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional conduct by government officials, there was no need to consider further whether such outrageous conduct disclosed malice.”

The Times, 10th May 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Huntley & Anor v Armes [2010] EWCA Civ 396 (11 May 2010)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Crown Prosecution Service v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011 (06 May 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) (10 May 2010)

High Court (Family Division)

PM v KH & Anor [2010] EWHC 870 (Fam) (30 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org