Ian Paterson: Why have private patients not been compensated? – BBC News

Posted June 26th, 2017 in cancer, compensation, health, insurance, medical treatment, news, wounding by sally

‘Patients taking out private health insurance expect to get the best treatment, but what happens if things go wrong? While the NHS has paid out millions to the patients of disgraced breast surgeon Ian Paterson, his private patients are still seeking compensation. Why?’

Full Story

BBC News, 26th June 2017

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

European Court of Justice ruling could open floodgates for spurious vaccination claims – Daily Telegraph

‘The European Court of Justice has been accused of undermining Britain’s vaccination programme after ruling that patients can sue for illnesses they believe were caused by jabs, even when there is no scientific evidence.’

Full Story

Daily Telegraph, 22nd June 2017

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Surrogacy Law / HFEA Update – Family Law Week

‘Andrew Powell, barrister of 4 Paper Buildings, considers recent surrogacy judgments and the latest cases concerning administrative errors relating to consent forms and the HFEA.’

Full Story

Family Law Week, 21st June 2017

Source: www.familylawweek.co.uk

Charlie Gard: Strasbourg Court imposes another stay on Supreme Court ruling to consider parents’ arguments – UK Human Rights Blog

‘Following the Strasbourg Court’s request for interim measures for the UK – which means the hospital may not take Charlie Gard off life support as the Supreme Court has allowed it to do – the Supreme Court arranged a short hearing to take place Monday 19 June, to give directions. The Strasbourg Court has now put in place a further request that treatment and nursing care be continued beyond its original deadline of 19 June (see the press release from Strasbourg here: Gard and Others v. the UK) . This is because that Court has to consider the parents’ application that the case does not just concern Charlie’s right to die with dignity but their rights under Article 8 as his parents to be afforded respect for their decisions as to what is in Charlie’s interests.’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 20th June 2017

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

Life support must continue for baby at centre of legal battle – The Guardian

Posted June 20th, 2017 in children, courts, human rights, medical treatment, news by sally

‘Doctors have been told to continue providing life-support treatment to a terminally ill baby at the centre of a high-profile legal battle for another three weeks – to give judges at the European court of human rights time to analyse the case.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 19th June 2017

Source: www.theguardian.com

In re Gard (A Child) (Child on Life Support: Withdrawal of Treatment) – WLR Daily

Posted June 15th, 2017 in appeals, children, law reports, medical treatment by sally

In re Gard (A Child) (Child on Life Support: Withdrawal of Treatment)[2017] EWCA Civ 410

‘C, a child aged nine months, suffered from a rare inherited mitochondrial disease which led to dysfunction of several of his organ systems. His condition had progressed since his birth resulting in irreversible brain damage and an inability to move his arms or legs or to breathe unaided. His life expectancy was measured in months. His parents sought to obtain an alternative treatment, known as nucleoside therapy, that was available in the United States of America. The NHS trust which ran the hospital where C was treated applied pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of the court for declarations that it was lawful and in C’s best interests for his artificial ventilation to be withdrawn, for his treating clinicians to provide him with palliative care only, and for him not to undergo nucleoside therapy. The judge granted the application and made the declarations sought, finding that the body of experienced medical opinion available to him, save for the doctor offering the nucleoside therapy, was unanimous to the effect that the prospect of nucleoside therapy having any benefit was effectively zero and would be futile. C’s parents sought permission to appeal on the grounds that (i) where parents put forward a viable treatment option for their child, that option could only be overriden by the court if it was established that the pursuit of that option was likely to cause the child to suffer “significant harm”, and the usual “best interests” test did not apply; and (ii) the judge had no jurisdiction to grant an order on the application of one clinical team preventing a second clinical team from carrying out a treatment that the latter had offered in the reasonable exercise of its professional judgment.’

WLR Daily, 24th May 2017

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Charlie Gard given six day reprieve as European Court of Human Rights says doctors must keep sick baby alive – Daily Telegraph

‘A couple who want to take their terminally ill baby son to the USA for treatment have been given a six day reprieve as the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said that doctors must continue treating him.’

Full Story

Daily Telegraph, 13th June 2017

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

European court to decide whether to hear more evidence on ill baby – The Guardian

Posted June 13th, 2017 in appeals, children, courts, human rights, medical treatment, news by sally

‘The European court of human rights is due to decide on Tuesday whether it will hear legal arguments from the family of a severely ill baby who want him to be sent to the US for treatment.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 13th June 2017

Source: www.theguardian.com

Doctors must continue to treat terminally ill baby, court rules – The Guardian

‘Doctors in London must continue to treat a terminally ill baby at the centre of a life-support legal battle until midnight on Tuesday, judges at the European court of human rights have said.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 9th June 2017

Source: www.theguardian.com

Alternative treatment for seriously ill child not in his best interests – UK Human Rights Blog

‘On Thursday 8 June the Supreme Court will be asked to grant permission to appeal in this case of a seriously ill 9 month old child whose parents wish to take him to the USA for experimental treatment that may slow his deterioration.’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 7th June 2017

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

British parents go to supreme court over sending sick baby to US – The Guardian

Posted June 1st, 2017 in appeals, children, medical treatment, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘The parents of a severely ill baby will take their legal battle to an emergency hearing at the supreme court next week in the hope of persuading judges that he should be treated in the US.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 31st May 2017

Source: www.theguardian.com

Mother asks court to permit doctors to cease care for ill daughter – The Guardian

Posted May 30th, 2017 in Court of Protection, euthanasia, families, medical treatment, news by sally

‘A woman has asked a judge to give doctors permission to stop providing life-support treatment to her severely ill daughter.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 29th May 2017

Source: www.theguardian.com

Bullying mother robbed teenage son of his childhood by convincing him he was dying, judge says – Daily Telegraph

‘A “bullying” mother robbed her teenage son of his childhood by convincing him he was dying, a judge has said.’

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 25th May 2017

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Charlie Gard’s parents lose life support court appeal – BBC News

Posted May 26th, 2017 in children, consent, hospitals, medical treatment, parental rights by tracey

‘Doctors can stop providing life-support treatment to ill baby Charlie Gard, Court of Appeal judges have ruled.’

Full story

BBC News, 25th May 2017

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Charlie Gard’s parents urge judges to reverse court decision – BBC News

Posted May 24th, 2017 in appeals, children, medical treatment, news by sally

‘The parents of a baby with a rare genetic condition have urged appeal judges not to stand in the way of their “only remaining hope” of his survival.’

Full story

BBC News, 23rd May 2017

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Duty of Care Owned by Junior Doctors: Important Court of Appeal Decision – Zenith PI Blog

Posted May 15th, 2017 in appeals, doctors, duty of care, medical treatment, negligence, news, standards by sally

‘In the decision today is FB -v- Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 334 the Court of Appeal made important observations about the duty of care owed by junior doctors.’

Full story

Zenith PI Blog, 12th May 2017

Source: www.zenithpi.wordpress.com

‘Poor vision’ surgeon who removed woman’s ovary instead of appendix struck off – Daily Telegraph

‘A senior surgeon with “poor vision” accidentally removed a woman’s ovary instead of her appendix and then told bosses it was a “trifling error”.’

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 12th May 2017

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Tainted blood scandal victim’s son to sue amid cover-up allegations – The Independent

‘A family member of a victim of the “biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS” plans to launch a landmark legal case amid allegations of a Government cover-up.’

Full story

The Independent, 10th May 2017

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Charlie Gard’s parents launch fresh appeal over ruling doctors can withdraw life support from brain-damaged baby – The Independent

Posted May 2nd, 2017 in appeals, children, medical treatment, news by sally

‘The parents of a baby with a rare genetic condition have launched an appeal after a judge said it was in their son’s “best interests” for life support to be withdrawn.’

Full story

The Independent, 2nd May 2017

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Private patients to miss out on compensation from God complex breast surgeon as Spire and union refuse to cover costs – Daily Telegraph

‘Hundreds of private patients of Ian Paterson, the rogue breast surgeon facing jail for mutilating women, may be denied compensation due to a legal loophole.

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 29th April 2017

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk