Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and others; Same v Stan James plc and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2013 in appeals, copyright, data protection, database right, EC law, law reports, sport by sally

Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and others; Same v Stan James plc and others [2013] EWCA Civ 27; [2013] WLR (D) 48

“Pursuant to article 7 of Parliament and Council Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases, a sui generis database right subsisted in a database consisting of information gathered live at football matches as those matches proceeded. It was not the case that there could be no article 7 right unless there was investment in collecting together materials which had already been recorded.”

WLR Daily, 6th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Ministry of Justice (formerly Department of Constitutional Affairs) v O’Brien – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2013 in EC law, judiciary, law reports, news, part-time work, pensions by sally

Ministry of Justice (formerly Department of Constitutional Affairs) v O’Brien [2013] UKSC 6; [2013] WLR (D) 47

“A part-time fee-paid judge was a worker under European Union law and had a right not to be treated in a less favourable manner than comparable full-time workers. The denial of retirement pensions to part-judges when full-time judges were granted pensions was less favourable treatment for which there was no objective justification. Accordingly, on the basic principle of remunerating part-time workers pro rata temporis, a recorder was entitled to a pension on terms equivalent to those applicable to a circuit judge.”

WLR Daily, 6th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

In re Coniston Hotel (Kent) LLP (in liquidation) Bernsten and another v Tait and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2013 in administrators, compensation, insolvency, law reports, news, pleadings by sally

In re Coniston Hotel (Kent) LLP (in liquidation) Bernsten and another v Tait and another [2013] EWHC 93 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 46

“Points of claim in insolvency proceedings should concisely set out every fact necessary to establish the legal basis for the relief sought but with a degree of particularity to enable those responding to understand the nature of the case.”

WLR Daily, 1st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 8th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Tayeh v Barchester Healthcare Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 29 (06 February 2013)

Situ Ventures Ltd v Bonham -Carter & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 47 (07 February 2013)

The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc [2013] EWCA Civ 40 (7 February 2013)

A (A Child), Re [2013] EWCA Civ 43 (06 February 2013)

The Children’s Rights Alliance for England, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 34 (06 February 2013)

Knox D’arcy Operations Ltd & Anor v Manches LLP [2013] EWCA Civ 33 (07 February 2013)

Kudos Catering (UK) Ltd v Manchester Central Convention Complex Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 38 (07 February 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Santander UK Plc v Harrison & Anor [2013] EWHC 199 (QB) (07 February 2013)

Duke v The University of Salford [2013] EWHC 196 (QB) (06 February 2013)

Barons Finance Ltd & Anor v Makanju [2013] EWHC 153 (QB) (06 February 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Andre & Anor v Clydesdale Bank Plc [2013] EWHC 169 (Ch) (01 February 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Tracey, R (on the application of) v Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2013] EWHC 197 (Admin) (7 February 2013)

High Court (Family Division)

VK v JV [2012] EWHC 4033 (Fam) (26 November 2012)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Emailgen Systems Corp v Exclaimer Ltd & Anor [2013] EWHC 167 (Comm) (07 February 2013)

High Court (Patents Court)

Dupont Nutrition Biosciences ApS v Novozymes A/S [2013] EWHC 155 (Pat) (07 February 2013)

Glenmark Generics (Europe) Ltd & Anor (t/a Mylan) v The Wellcome Foundation Ltd & Anor [2013] EWHC 148 (Pat) (07 February 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

Regina (Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council and others – WLR Daily

Regina (Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council and others [2013] EWCA Civ 28; [2013] WLR (D) 45

“Sections 143 and 145 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 were carefully targeted to prevent protesters camping with tents or sleeping equipment on Parliament Square Gardens, but did not generally impair freedom to protest at all. As a consequence they were not incompatible with the rights to freedom of expression and protest in articles 10 and 11 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Sincethe procedure set out in the 2011 Act allowed for access to a court, article 6 of the Convention was not engaged.”

WLR Daily, 30th January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina (Redcar and Cleveland Independent Providers Association and others) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2013 in care homes, elderly, fees, judicial review, law reports, local government, news by sally

Regina (Redcar and Cleveland Independent Providers Association and others) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council [2013] EWHC 4 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 44

“A dispute between care providers and a local authority over the rate due for supporting the care of the elderly in care homes was amenable to judicial review.”

WLR Daily, 17th January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina v B (M) – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2013 in appeals, consent, law reports, mental health, rape by sally

Regina v B (M) [2013] EWCA Crim 3; [2013] WLR (D) 43

“Under the rule in section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, unless the defendant’s state of mind amounted to insanity in law, beliefs in consent arising from conditions such as delusional psychotic illness or personality disorders had to be judged by objective standards of reasonableness and not by taking into account a mental disorder which induced a belief which could not reasonably arise without it.”

WLR Daily, 31st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corpn and others v Harris and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2013 in copyright, injunctions, law reports, media by sally

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corpn and others v Harris and others [2013] EWHC 159 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 42

“A copyright owner did not have a proprietary claim to money derived from infringement of the copyright.”

WLR Daily, February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

VTB Capital plc v Nutritek and others – WLR Daily

VTB Capital plc v Nutritek and others [2013] UKSC 5; [2013] WLR (D) 41

“Where a claimant alleged that it had been induced by the fraudulent misrepresentations of a third party to enter a contract with a company, and sought to make a contractual claim against the third party as being jointly and severally liable with the company, it was not appropriate for the court to pierce the corporate veil, even if it could do so on appropriate facts, since to do so would render the third party liable as if he had been a co-contracting party with the company when he had not, and when none of the contracting parties, including the claimant, had intended that he should be.”

WLR Daily, 6th February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Ridgewood Properties Group Ltd and others v Valero Energy Ltd (Pannone & Partners (a firm), Part 20 defendant) – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2013 in contracts, enforcement, landlord & tenant, law reports, leases, third parties by sally

Ridgewood Properties Group Ltd and others v Valero Energy Ltd (Pannone & Partners (a firm), Part 20 defendant) [2013] EWHC 98 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 40

“An option in an agreement which, if taken up, would lead to a tenancy was not ‘an agreement for a tenancy’ for the purposes of section 28(1) of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995. Also, conditions precedent to the grant of lease were not covenants that were part of the agreement for a tenancy nor were they comprised within landlord and tenant covenants for the purposes of section 28. Therefore, in neither case did the burden of the obligation undertaken by the vendor transfer to the purchaser by virtue of the 1995 Act.”

WLR Daily, February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 7th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp & Ors [2013] UKSC 5 (6 February 2013)

O’Brien v Ministry of Justice [2013] UKSC 6 (6 February 2013)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Adeojo & Anor v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 41 (06 February 2013)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Templeton Insurance Ltd v Thomas & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 35 (05 February 2013)

Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Stan James Plc & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 27 (06 February 2013)

International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance Plc UK Branch [2013] EWCA Civ 39 (06 February 2013)

Wilkinson & Ors v Kerdene Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 44 (06 February 2013)

Abdullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 42 (06 February 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Montpellier Estates Ltd v Leeds City Council [2013] EWHC 166 (QB) (06 February 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Kwao v University of Keele [2013] EWHC 56 (Admin) (24 January 2013)

Sandiford, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2013] EWHC 168 (Admin) (04 February 2013)

Burger v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2013] EWHC 172 (Admin) (06 February 2013)

Winchester City Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2013] EWHC 101 (Admin) (01 February 2013)

AT & Ors, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2013] EWHC 107 (Admin) (01 February 2013)

Scholten, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 173 (Admin) (06 February 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Cadogan Maritime Inc v Turner Shipping Inc [2013] EWHC 138 (Comm) (05 February 2013)

Lehman Brothers Bankhaus AG I. Ins v CMA CGM [2013] EWHC 171 (Comm) (06 February 2013)

Source: www.bailli.org

O’Brien (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs) (Respondents) – Supreme Court

O’Brien (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs) (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 6 | UKSC 2012/0168 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 6th February 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

VTB Capital plc (Appellant) v Nutritek International Corp and others (Respondents) – Supreme Court

VTB Capital plc (Appellant) v Nutritek International Corp and others (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 5 | UKSC 2012/0167 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 6th February 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 5th, 2013 in law reports by sally

High Court (Commercial Court)

Akciné Bendrové Bankas Snoras v Antonov & Anor [2013] EWHC 131 (Comm) (04 February 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 4th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Dickinson & Ors v Tesco Plc & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 36 (04 February 2013)

Zaki & Ors v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 14 (01 February 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

MB & Ors v Secretary of State for Home Department [2013] EWHC 123 (Admin) (01 February 2013)

Ali Hussein v Secretary of State for Defence [2013] EWHC 95 (Admin) (01 February 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA [2013] EWHC 30 (Comm) (01 February 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Yam Seng PTE Ltd v International Trade Corporation Ltd [2013] EWHC 111 (QB) (01 February 2013)

Makudi v Baron Triesman of Tottenham in London Borough of Haringey [2013] EWHC 142 (QB) (01 February 2013)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Atkins Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2013] EWHC 139 (TCC) (01 February 2013)

Aldersgate Estates Ltd v HAM Construction Ltd [2013] EWHC 104 (TCC) (31 January 2013)

Lazari v London & Newcastle (Camden) Ltd [2013] EWHC 97 (TCC) (31 January 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

 

 

D and another v Refugee Applications Commissioner (Ireland) and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 4th, 2013 in appeals, asylum, EC law, immigration, law reports by sally

D and another v Refugee Applications Commissioner (Ireland) and others: (Case C-175/11);   [2013] WLR (D)  39

“Article 23(3) and (4) of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in member states for granting and withdrawing refugee status (OJ 2005 L326, p 13) did not preclude a member state from examining by way of prioritised or accelerated procedure, in compliance with the basic principles and guarantees set out in Chapter II of that Directive, certain categories of asylum applications defined on the basis of the criterion of the nationality or country of origin of the applicant. Article 39 did not preclude national legislation which allowed an applicant for asylum either to lodge an appeal against the decision of the determining authority before a court or tribunal such as the Refugee Appeals Tribunal (Ireland), and to bring an appeal against the decision of that tribunal before a higher court such as the High Court (Ireland), or to contest the validity of that determining authority’s decision before the High Court, the judgments of which might be the subject of an appeal to the Supreme Court (Ireland).”

WLR Daily, 31st January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 1st, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

EU (Afghanistan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 32 (31 January 2013)

LH (Nigeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 26 (30 January 2013)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Druce v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 40 (31 January 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

A & E Television Networks LLC & Anor v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch) (01 February 2013)

St Anselm Development Company Ltd v Slaughter and May (A Firm) [2013] EWHC 125 (Ch) (01 February 2013)

Lissack v Manhattan Loft Corporation Ltd [2013] EWHC 128 (Ch) (31 January 2013)

GKN Holdings Plc & Ors v Inland Revenue & Anor [2013] EWHC 108 (Ch) (31 January 2013)

Pavledes & Anor v Hadjisavva & Anor [2013] EWHC 124 (Ch) (31 January 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2013] EWHC 84 (Comm) (29 January 2013)

High Court (Family Division)

S v D & E [2013] EWHC 134 (Fam) (31 January 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org.uk

Hackney London Borough Council v Sivanandan and others – WLR Daily

Hackney London Borough Council v Sivanandan and others: [2013] EWCA Civ 22;   [2013] WLR (D)  34

“The employment tribunal had not erred in law when, on a complaint of victimisation, it made an award of compensation against an employer which was much larger than an award it had already made against the employer’s employee at an earlier remedy hearing in which the employer had not taken part.”

WLR Daily, 29th January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina (Ali and others) v Secretary of State for Justice – WLR Daily

Posted February 1st, 2013 in compensation, judicial review, law reports, miscarriage of justice by sally

Regina (Ali and others) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2013] EWHC 72 (Admin);   [2013] WLR (D)  35

“A useful test to determine whether an individual, whose conviction had been quashed on the basis of new evidence, qualified for compensation under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 on the ground of miscarriage of justice, was whether he had established, beyond reasonable doubt, that no reasonable jury (or magistrates) properly directed as to the law, could convict on the evidence now to be considered.”

WLR Daily, 25th January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Wolkowicz and others v Polish Judicial Authority and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 1st, 2013 in adjournment, appeals, EC law, extradition, law reports, mental health by sally

Wolkowicz and others v Polish Judicial Authority and another: [2013] EWHC 102 (Admin);  [2013] WLR (D)  36

“Although section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003 should be interpreted, wherever possible, to achieve the results sought by article 23(4) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant, it nevertheless gave express power to discharge and was not limited to a temporary postponement save in exceptional cases.”

WLR Daily, 30th January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk