Blind Dates in Contract and Agency: Who is My Contractual Counterparty?! – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in agency, appeals, chambers articles, contracts, news by sally

‘The Second Respondent (‘Mr Chernukhin’) was a prominent Russian businessman and former State official. In 2001, Mr Chernukhin entered into a joint venture with the Second Appellant (‘Mr Deripaska’), also a prominent Russian businessman, to acquire a controlling interest in a Russian textile company (‘TGM’). It was agreed between Mr Deripaska and Mr Chernukhin that each would contribute equally to the purchase, and that Mr Chernukhin’s then personal partner, one Ms Danilina, would be involved in running the business.’

Full Story

Hardwicke Chambers, 6th April 2020

Source: hardwicke.co.uk

Covid 19 Employment Law Series: Frustration: (Largely) unprecedented measures for unprecedented times? – Parklane Plowden

‘A contract may come to an end by operation of the doctrine of frustration when an unforeseen event makes performance impossible or radically different to what the parties originally intended. The doctrine applies to employment contracts as it does to other types of contract. However, it is an issue rarely encountered by employment lawyers. Tribunals are generally reluctant to find that an employment contract has been frustrated, largely because the doctrine allows employers to sidestep statutory protections afforded to employees. However, unprecedented times call for unprecedented measures, and frustration may become a useful tool in certain employers’ fight against the disruption caused by the Covid 19 pandemic.’

Full Story

Parklane Plowden, 1st April 2020

Source: www.parklaneplowden.co.uk

Oung Lin Chaun-Hui & Ors v K Group Holdings Inc & Ors – Tanfield Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, housing, landlord & tenant, news, service charges, tribunals by sally

‘The Upper Tribunal considered the status of service charges recovered by a manager appointed under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.’

Full Story

Tanfield Chambers, 2nd April 2020

Source: www.tanfieldchambers.co.uk

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14 – Old Square Chambers

‘The Respondent (X) had been rendered infertile due to the trust’s negligence. Liability was admitted.’

Full Story

Old Square Chambers, 8th April 2020

Source: www.oldsquare.co.uk

Family Law Arbitration: Is it for me? – Pump Court Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in arbitration, chambers articles, dispute resolution, families, news by sally

‘On 22nd February 2012 a new method of alternative dispute resolution was launched to assist parties to resolve their family problems: arbitration. Arbitration in Family Law developed at around the time when the scope of legal aid was being restricted as a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 and the Regulations made pursuant to that Act.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 8th April 2020

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

The impact of Coronavirus, part 2: attending hearings in the Crown Court remotely – 6KBW College Hill

‘On 25 March 2020, the Coronavirus Act 2020 (‘the 2020 Act’) was given Royal Assent. Most of its provisions came into force immediately (s. 87). Almost all of them will expire within two years (s. 89). As an additional safeguard, Parliament is required to conduct a review of the legislation every six months (s. 98). The 2020 Act has, at least for the time being, radically changed the appearance of proceedings in the Crown Court: there will now be hearings where neither the parties nor the judge will actually be in court at all.’

Full Story

6KBW College Hill, 2nd April 2020

Source: blog.6kbw.com

Receivership in the COVID-19 Crisis – Falcon Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, coronavirus, news, receivers by sally

‘The Covid-19 crisis, and the Government’s containment measures, have had an extraordinary effect on business and society. This article looks at the legal implications for receiverships, focussing on the effect on existing receiverships.’

Full Story

Falcon Chambers, April 2020

Source: www.falcon-chambers.com

Noise Induced hearing loss: De minimis, the better hearing ear and acceleration injuries – Parklane Plowden

‘This article will discuss the first instance decision of DJ Adams in the case of French v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy heard in Newcastle County Court on noise-induced hearing loss.’

Full Story

Parklane Plowden, 1st April 2020

Source: www.parklaneplowden.co.uk

Stay at Home – Housing Law in the Coronavirus Pandemic – Pump Court Chambers

‘In a time when we are all being urged to stay in our homes it seems appropriate to consider the recent changes to Housing Law in light of the Coronavirus pandemic. This article will consider the Coronavirus Act 2020, Practice Direction 51Z and the Guidance document issued by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (‘Guidance’).’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 7th April 2020

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

The essential contents of a furlough letter/email/agreement – 3PB

‘If you are reading this article with alacrity, chances are you are in charge of a business contemplating adoption of the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (the Scheme) in preference to laying-off or making redundant some or all of your workforce; that, or you will be looking to advise such people on what to include within a furlough letter.’

Full Story

3PB, 7th April 2020

Source: www.3pb.co.uk

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – Pump Court Chambers

‘The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“the Scheme”) was announced by the government on 20th March 2020.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 4th April 2020

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust v MB [2020] EWHC 882 (QB): the unintended consequences of the stay of possession claims under Practice Direction 51Z – Falcon Chambers

‘Practice Direction 51Z was hastily brought into force on Friday 27 March 2020, after the Prime Minister’s televised instructions to the nation on the evening of Monday 23 March 2020 that everyone should stay at home in order to beat coronavirus. Practice Direction 51Z imposed a three-month stay on all Part 55 possession proceedings, which ensures that those who were facing the possibility of eviction from their home have some protection during the crisis. However, since the Practice Direction came into force, property practitioners have been grappling with the possibly unintended consequences that come from its very wide scope. This has been brought into sharp focus by the recent case of University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust v MB [2020] EWHC 882 (QB), in which PD51Z prevented an NHS Trust from obtaining a possession order to facilitate the discharge of a patient from hospital, in circumstances where her bed was needed for critically ill-patients, she was medically fit for discharge, and indeed she would be at less risk of infection from COVID-19 if out of the hospital. As this article explains, the NHS Trust in the UCLH case was able to obtain the relief it needed by the alternative route of an injunction, but the case nevertheless highlights that PD51Z may need to be revisited.’

Full Story

Falcon Chambers, 15th April 2020

Source: www.falcon-chambers.com

Civil Procedure, Human Rights and the Coronavirus (Part 2) – Blackstone Chambers

‘The first article in this mini-series addressed the current position taken by Courts, Tribunals and other relevant bodies and key issues for litigators. Following the present article, the final instalment will be entitled “Civil Procedure, Litigation and the Coronavirus”.’

Full Story

Blackstone Chambers, 23rd March 2020

Source: coronavirus.blackstonechambers.com

Frustration, Force Majeure and Covid-19 – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, contracts, coronavirus, news by sally

‘Frustration and force majeure are legal concepts very much to the fore during the Covid-19 pandemic. John de Waal QC and Tom Bell review how they apply to the current coronavirus situation.’

Full Story

Hardwicke Chambers, 14th April 2020

Source: hardwicke.co.uk

The implied term of trust and confidence & the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – Old Square Chambers

‘The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“the Scheme”) is a grant that, for those eligible, covers 80% of the usual monthly wage costs up to a ceiling of £2,500 per month plus associated employer NICs and employer pension contributions paid on the furlough pay up to the level of the minimum automatic enrolment employer contribution. Employees can be on any type of employment contract, including full-time, part-time, agency, flexible or zero-hour contracts. Foreign nationals are also eligible to be furloughed.’

Full Story

Old Square Chambers, 14th April 2020

Source: www.oldsquare.co.uk

Charterparty Indemnity Clauses and Injunctive Relief – 33 Bedford Row

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, charterparties, indemnities, interpretation, news by sally

‘The case concerned the interpretation of an indemnity clause in an amended Shellvoy6 form Charterparty and whether the Claimant time charterers should be granted injunctive relief, in the form of security to be provided by the Defendant voyage charterers, so as to enable release of the MT “Miracle Hope” (the “Vessel”), which was under arrest in Singapore.’

Full Story

33 Bedford Row, 7th April 2020

Source: www.33bedfordrow.co.uk

Case Comment by Nathan Davis – Pwr and others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2020] EWHC 798 (Admin) – is an offence under section 13(1) Terrorism Act 2000 a strict liability offence? – Park Square Barristers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, demonstrations, news, strict liability, terrorism by sally

‘Pwr and others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2020] EWHC 798 (Admin) – is an offence under section 13(1) Terrorism Act 2000 a strict liability offence?’

Full Story

Park Square Barristers, 9th April 2020

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

The impact of Coronavirus, part 3: the emergency criminal offences – 6KBW College Hill

‘The current pandemic has led to a flood of emergency legislation. This post deals with The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020 No. 350) made under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, which supplement the Coronavirus Act 2020. The Regulations are, as is now trite, the strictest control on peacetime life in the modern history of the United Kingdom, and they set out the limits of the “lockdown” and how it is to be enforced. This post aims to set out how the Regulations apply to individuals, and provide some analysis of their contents.’

Full Story

6KBW College Hill, 6th April 2020

Source: blog.6kbw.com

COVID-19 and Business Interruption Insurance – Thomas More Chambers

Posted April 20th, 2020 in chambers articles, coronavirus, insurance, news by sally

‘If you find the word “virus” in the Definitions section of a typical business insurance policy, it will likely refer to malware, trojans or spyware infecting a company’s computer system and not to Covid-19 or anything like it which infects people.’

Full Story

Thomas More Chambers, 14th April 2020

Source: www.thomasmore.co.uk

Coping with Remote Hearings – Falcon Chambers

‘At the turn of the new year it would have been unthinkable to suggest that in just three months the majority of the courts in England and Wales would be closed, that is, at least in the physical sense. In the wake of Covid-19 the Courts have remained open for business however, most of that business is now being conducted in the virtual realm. From online mediations and applications to full-blown witness actions, this is a brave new world for most practitioners, particularly those in civil law, who are used to lugging paper-laden suitcases up and down the various Courts in the land.’

Full Story

Falcon Chambers, 6th April 2020

Source: www.falcon-chambers.com