Reconsideration of old human rights applications – Free Movement

Posted May 22nd, 2015 in appeals, human rights, immigration, news by sally

‘The Home Office has introduced a new policy on reconsideration of old human rights claims that were refused before 6 April 2015 with no right of appeal: Requests for reconsiderations of human rights or protection based claims refused without right of appeal before 6 April 2015. The policy is important in the very many cases where a human rights application was made by an individual or family and the application was refused with no right of appeal because no removal decision was made. Under the new appeals regime introduced by the Immigration Act 2014 from 6 April 2014, no removal decision is needed for a right of appeal, only refusal of a human rights claim.’
Full story

Free Movement, 21st May 2015

Source: www.freemovement.co.uk

Comments Off on Reconsideration of old human rights applications – Free Movement

Part 36 penalties in detailed costs assessments – Zenith PI Blog

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, civil procedure rules, news, part 36 offers by sally

‘This matter was an appeal from a senior cost Judge refusing to award an additional amount under CPR 36.14(3) (d) on a detailed assessment of costs. The law with which this judgement is concerned is CPR 36 as it was prior to its amendment on the 6th April 2015.’
Full story

Zenith PI Blog, 20th May 2015

Source: www.zenithpi.wordpress.com

Comments Off on Part 36 penalties in detailed costs assessments – Zenith PI Blog

Pianist James Rhodes can publish child abuse memoir – BBC News

‘A concert pianist has won a legal battle to publish an autobiographical book giving details of sexual abuse he experienced as a child.’

Full story

BBC News, 20th May 2015

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Comments Off on Pianist James Rhodes can publish child abuse memoir – BBC News

Court of Appeal rules on vexatious and unreasonable information requests – Local Government Lawyer

‘The Court of Appeal has handed down a key ruling on the scope of a public authority’s power to reject a request for information as ‘vexatious’ or ‘manifestly unreasonable’.’

Full story

Local Government Lawyer, 20th May 2015

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Comments Off on Court of Appeal rules on vexatious and unreasonable information requests – Local Government Lawyer

Phone hacking: Paul Gascoigne wins damages from Mirror Group – BBC News

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, damages, interception, media, news, privacy, telecommunications by sally

‘Former footballer Paul Gascoigne has won £188,250 in phone-hacking damages from Mirror Group Newspapers.’

Full story

BBC News, 21st May 2015

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Comments Off on Phone hacking: Paul Gascoigne wins damages from Mirror Group – BBC News

In re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (in administration) (No 4) – WLR Daily

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, banking, insolvency, law reports by sally

In re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (in administration) (No 4) [2015] EWCA Civ 485; [2015] WLR (D) 218

‘The Court of Appeal made rulings following determination of issues raised in the administration of three companies as to the potential liability of two members in the group for the liabilities of the principal trading company, an unlimited company, and in particular its subordinated liabilities, and the relationship between their liability, if any, as members and their claims as creditors.’

WLR Daily, 14th May 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on In re Lehman Bros International (Europe) (in administration) (No 4) – WLR Daily

Polish Judicial Authorities v Celinski; Slovakian Judicial Authority v Cambal; Nida v Polish Judicial Authorities; Ciemiega v Polish Judicial Authorities; Regina (Inglot) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another; Polish Judicial Authorities v Pawelec – WLR Daily

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, extradition, human rights, law reports by sally

Polish Judicial Authorities v Celinski; Slovakian Judicial Authority v Cambal; Nida v Polish Judicial Authorities; Ciemiega v Polish Judicial Authorities; Regina (Inglot) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another; Polish Judicial Authorities v Pawelec [2015] EWHC 1274 (Admin); [2015] WLR (D) 207

‘In extradition proceedings under Part I of the Extradition Act 2003 an appellate court, in answering the question whether a district judge had been wrong to decide that extradition was or was not proportionate with the requested person’s rights under article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, had to focus on whether the decision on proportionality itself was wrong.’

WLR Daily, 6th May 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on Polish Judicial Authorities v Celinski; Slovakian Judicial Authority v Cambal; Nida v Polish Judicial Authorities; Ciemiega v Polish Judicial Authorities; Regina (Inglot) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another; Polish Judicial Authorities v Pawelec – WLR Daily

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (B) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission – WLR Daily

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, bail, deportation, detention, immigration, law reports by sally

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (B) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2015] EWCA Civ 445; [2015] WLR (D) 210

‘Where a person’s detention by the Home Secretary, purportedly made pursuant to paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 1971 as amended, pending deportation was unlawful, or where a person not currently in detention could not lawfully be detained under that provision, bail could not be granted pursuant to paragraphs 22 and 29 of Schedule 2 to the 1971 Act, as amended.’

WLR Daily, 6th May 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on B v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (B) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission – WLR Daily

Supreme Court backs “broad equitable approach” to insurers’ liability in mesothelioma cases – Litigation Futures

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, asbestos, compensation, insurance, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘Insurers liable to pay compensation to mesothelioma victims have rights to pro rata contributions from other insurers and/or employers covering some of the time of exposure, the Supreme Court has ruled.’
Full story

Litigation Futures, 20th May 2015

Source: www.litigationfutures.co.uk

Comments Off on Supreme Court backs “broad equitable approach” to insurers’ liability in mesothelioma cases – Litigation Futures

Credit Hire Simplified? – Zenith PI Blog

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, consumer credit, damages, news, rent by sally

‘In cases where the hirer of a car on credit terms is not impecunious, we thought we knew where we stood after Dimond v Lovell [2001] 1AC 384. The Claimant was entitled to recover the ‘spot rate’ or, as the Court of Appeal in Pattni v First Leicester Buses Ltd [2012] RTR 17 insisted, ‘basic hire rate’ or BHR. In Burdis v Livsey [2003] QB 36, three possible ways of calculating the basic hire rate were considered and indeed that consideration was repeated by Aikens LJ in Pattni. Both the Court of Appeal in Burdis and the Court of Appeal in Pattni rejected the mode of calculation of applying a reasonable discount to the credit hire rate charged. That left two methods of calculation. The first, which was not favoured by the Court of Appeal in Burdis, was to break down the charge made by the credit hire company and remove the additional elements from the claim in respect of credit, claim handling and delivery &c. The Court of Appeal in Burdis thought that the cost of working all that out might well be disproportionate. The court in Pattni, however, considered that where the actual credit hire company which had hired the replacement car to the Claimant, disclosed the BHR for that type of car in that area at that time, that might well be the best mode of calculation.’

Full story

Zenith PI Blog, 20th May 2015

Source: www.zenithpi.wordpress.com

Comments Off on Credit Hire Simplified? – Zenith PI Blog

Supreme Court upholds challenge to council decision on intentional homelessness – Local Government Lawyer

Posted May 21st, 2015 in appeals, homelessness, local government, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘Local authorities have been advised to review urgently their intentional homelessness decision making after the Supreme Court – by a 4-1 majority – today upheld an appellant’s challenge.’

Full story

Local Government Lawyer, 21st May 2015

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Comments Off on Supreme Court upholds challenge to council decision on intentional homelessness – Local Government Lawyer

Paedophile doctor Myles Bradbury’s appeal ‘contemptible’ – BBC News

Posted May 20th, 2015 in appeals, child abuse, doctors, news, sentencing, sexual offences by sally

‘A paedophile doctor’s appeal against his sentence is “utterly contemptible”, the mother of one victim has said.’

Full story

BBC News, 19th May 2015

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Comments Off on Paedophile doctor Myles Bradbury’s appeal ‘contemptible’ – BBC News

Garry Newlove killer’s sentence reduction bid rejected – BBC News

Posted May 20th, 2015 in appeals, murder, news, sentencing by sally

‘A man who kicked to death a father-of-three outside his Warrington home in 2007 has lost a bid to have his sentence reduced.’

Full story

BBC News, 19th May 2015

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Comments Off on Garry Newlove killer’s sentence reduction bid rejected – BBC News

Costs, Orders, Discontinuance and CPR r.38.6(1): Barker and Barker v Barnett (2015) (QBD) – Zenith PI Blog

Posted May 19th, 2015 in appeals, civil procedure rules, costs, news, pre-action conduct by sally

‘The court can depart from the usual rule in CPR r.38.6(1) that a Claimant who has discontinued their claim is liable for the costs which a Defendant has incurred and, alternatively, order that the Defendant pay a part of the Claimant’s costs.’

Full story

Zenith PI Blog, 18th May 2015

Source: www.zenithpi.wordpress.com

Comments Off on Costs, Orders, Discontinuance and CPR r.38.6(1): Barker and Barker v Barnett (2015) (QBD) – Zenith PI Blog

Companies House and the £9m typo – OUP Blog

Posted May 19th, 2015 in appeals, company law, damages, disclosure, mistake, news by sally

‘Conducting business through a company provides tremendous benefits. The price to be paid for these benefits is disclosure – companies are required to disclose substantial amounts of information, with much of this information being disclosed to Companies House. Every day, suppliers, creditors, potential investors, credit agencies and other persons utilise information provided by Companies House to make informed commercial decisions. It is therefore vital that when Companies House records this information into the register of companies, that it is recorded accurately, with the recent case of Sebry v Companies House [2015] EWHC 115 (QB) providing a stark example of the disastrous consequences that can occur if information is incorrectly recorded.’

Full story

OUP Blog, 19th May 2015

Source: http://blog.oup.com

Comments Off on Companies House and the £9m typo – OUP Blog

Vulnerability – a fresh start – Nearly Legal

Posted May 14th, 2015 in appeals, equality, homelessness, local government, news, Supreme Court by tracey

‘The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. If the Supreme Court thinks otherwise, they are so much chaff. And so, to some extent, it proved to be in these joined appeals, where the issue was the meaning of vulnerability in s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996.’

Full story

Nearly Legal, 13th May 2015

Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk

Comments Off on Vulnerability – a fresh start – Nearly Legal

Supreme Court overturns key test on homeless people and vulnerability – Local Government Lawyer

Posted May 14th, 2015 in appeals, homelessness, local government, news, Supreme Court by tracey

‘The Supreme Court has today issued a landmark ruling in three linked appeals over when homeless people are to be considered “vulnerable” under the Housing Act 1996 and therefore in priority need.’

Full story

Local Government Lawyer, 13th May 2015

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Comments Off on Supreme Court overturns key test on homeless people and vulnerability – Local Government Lawyer

Retention of offenders’ DNA profiles not illegal, supreme court rules – The Guardian

Posted May 14th, 2015 in appeals, DNA, human rights, news, police, privacy, proportionality by tracey

‘Retaining DNA profiles of convicted adults indefinitely is not an illegal breach of their privacy, the supreme court has ruled in a test case involving a Northern Ireland drink driver. he judgment by the UK’s highest court sets a significant precedent in making a clear distinction between information that police forces may keep on those who have been convicted, as opposed to those who were merely suspects.’

Full story

The Guardian, 13th May 2015

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Comments Off on Retention of offenders’ DNA profiles not illegal, supreme court rules – The Guardian

In re MN (An Adult) (Court of Protection: Jurisdiction) – WLR Daily

In re MN (An Adult) (Court of Protection: Jurisdiction): [2015] EWCA Civ 411; [2015] WLR (D) 208

‘The function of the Court of Protection was to take, on behalf of adults who lacked capacity, the decisions which, if they had capacity, they would take themselves. The Court of Protection was thus confined to choosing between available options, including those which there was good reason to believe would be forthcoming in the foreseeable future and, in the final analysis, could not compel a public authority to agree to a care plan which the authority was unwilling to implement.’

WLR Daily, 7th May 2015

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Comments Off on In re MN (An Adult) (Court of Protection: Jurisdiction) – WLR Daily

High Court critical of Pickles’ approach to neighbourhood planning appeal – OUT-LAW.com

Posted May 13th, 2015 in appeals, news, planning by tracey

‘The High Court has allowed an appeal against the decision of outgoing communities secretary Eric Pickles to block a 120-home development in a West Sussex village after Pickles was found to have placed too much weight on the policies of an emerging neighbourhood plan and failed properly to justify his decision in line with government planning policy.’

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 12th May 2015

Source: www.out-law.com

Comments Off on High Court critical of Pickles’ approach to neighbourhood planning appeal – OUT-LAW.com