Solicitors, giving independent advice, and exposure to claims for negligence incurred thereby – Sovereign Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in duty of care, legal profession, negligence, news, solicitors, undue influence by sally

“The long running case of Padden v Bevan Ashford [2013] EWCA Civ 824 has reached its dénouement. It is a case not without its human interest, and legally it illustrates important points of practice and principle which arise when a solicitor is instructed to give independent advice on what may well be an improvident transaction, as well, perhaps, on the vagaries of some county court judges. It has involved two county court trials, including a retrial after one county court judge decided that the defendants had no case to answer, and that to ‘foist’ a duty to give ‘full’ advice on a solicitor who simply agreed to see someone who had come in off the street was ‘an absurdity’. To the concern of many solicitors, but quite correctly, both the subsequent judge upon a re-trial the Court of Appeal (twice) decided that the case was anything but absurd. In the end, the solicitors were liable.”

Full story

Sovereign Chambers, 30th July 2013

Source: www.sovereignchambers.co.uk

The Curious Case of Bank Mellat – Dyers Chambers

“On 19 June 2013, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 1) and (No. 2). Gavin Irwin reviews the latest developments in the deployment of sanctions against Iran and the tensions that can arise between international organisations, nation states and commercial entities.”

Full story (PDF)

Dyers Chambers, 11th July 2013

Source: www.dyerschambers.com

Forced Marriage and Court of Protection – No. 5 Chambers

“In this two part article, Adreeja Chatterjee provides an introduction to the forced marriage legislation. This article explores the ‘typical’ forced marriage scenario, and how this compares to scenarios which crop up in the Court of Protection – where the mental capacity of the bride or groom is at the heart of the case. There is also an exploration of the case of [XCC v AA & Anor (Rev 3) [2012] EWHC 2183 (COP) (26 July 2012)] – a case in which Adreeja appeared in the first part of the litigation, and which merits close scrutiny.”

Full story

No. 5 Chambers, 29th July 2013

Source: www.no5.com

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 – Top Ten guide to the new act by Marisa Allman – Zenith Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in civil partnerships, homosexuality, marriage, news by sally

“This is an Act to make provision for same sex couples in England and Wales and about gender change for married persons and civil partners. It does not;

– Change the law relating to marriage for couples of the opposite sex
– Abolish civil partnership or repeal the Civil Partnership Act 2004
– Extend civil partnership to couples of the opposite sex”

Full story

Zenith Chambers, 24th July 2013

Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk

Local authorities and fracking – Hardwicke Chambers

“To its supporters fracking is a revolutionary method of extracting gas and oil which will help drive down fuel prices in the UK, lower CO2 emissions and reduce the country’s dependence on foreign energy supplies. To its opponents it is a dangerous distraction from investment in renewable fuels, which can lead to the escape of carcinogenic chemicals into water supplies and which can cause minor earthquakes.”

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 24th July 2013

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

LIBOR Update – who will be next? – Dyers Chambers

On 20th June 2013, Tom Hayes, a former trader with UBS, appeared before Westminster Magistrates Court charged with eight counts of fraud. He is the first individual to be prosecuted as a result of the SFO’s investigation into the LIBOR scandal. Peter Caldwell reviews the background to the investigation and examines the challenges that lie ahead for the Serious Fraud Office.

Full story (PDF)

Dyers Chambers, 11th July 2013

Source: www.dyerschambers.com

“All Money” Guarantees Mean What They Say – Littleton Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in banking, contracts, guarantees, interpretation, news, vicarious liability by sally

“On 9 July I looked at a Court of Appeal decision which showed that it remained arguable that a change in the arrangements between a creditor and the principal debtor might so alter the subject matter of what was guaranteed as to discharge the guarantor. This week comes a timely reminder that the first and fundamental step is to construe the contract to see what obligations are covered by the guarantee.”

Full story

Littleton Chambers, 19th July 2013

Source: www.littletonchambers.com

Sentencing in Serious and Complex Frauds – Dyers Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in banking, commercial agents, conspiracy, criminal justice, fraud, news, sentencing by sally

“Giles Bedloe, who acted as junior counsel in SFO v Williams reviews the recent statements of the Court of Appeal in Attorney General’s Reference Nos. 7 & 8 of 2012 and R v Levene [2013] EWCA 709.”

Full story (PDF)

Dyers Chambers, 11th July 2013

Source: www.dyerschambers.com

Will the recast Cosmetics Regulation provide greater protection for consumers in relation to cosmetics and personal care products? – Doughty Street Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in advertising, consumer protection, EC law, health & safety, news by sally

“Eloise Power writes about EC Cosmetics Regulation (Regulation EC No 1223/2009) and Commission Regulation (Regulation EU No 655/2013) now in force.”

Full story

Doughty Street Chambers, 24th July 2013

Source: www.doughtystreet.co.uk

The lawlessness of private rent lets us all down – Garden Court Chambers Blog

Posted July 31st, 2013 in bills, landlord & tenant, local government, news, rent by sally

“Liz Davies considers the ways in which landlords have benefited from the credit crisis and explores how tenants could be given increased security through five-year tenancies.”

Full story

Garden Court Chambers Blog, 30th July 2013

Source: www.gclaw.wordpress.com

Nortel / Lehman Supreme Court decision: guidance on insolvency expenses and provable claims – 11 Stone Buildings

Posted July 31st, 2013 in administrators, debts, expenses, insolvency, news, pensions by sally

“The Supreme Court ruled today that sums claimed under a Financial Support Direction of the Pensions
Regulator that is issued after a company’s entry to insolvency will rank as provable debts. It disagreed with both the High Court and a unanimous Court of Appeal, which had held that sums claimed under such a FSD were payable as insolvency expenses. The Supreme Court also rejected an argument that such a claim ranked below ordinary creditors as a non-provable liability.”

Full story (PDF)

11 Stone Buildings, 24th July 2013

Source: www.11sb.com

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Ramifications of the SC Decision in Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited – 11 KBW

Presentation

11 KBW, 24th July 2013

Source: www.11kbw.com

NHS Trust in court battle to sterilise disabled man – Daily Telegraph

“An NHS trust is fighting a court battle to sterilise a man with moderate learning difficulties.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 30th July 2013

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Anneliese Day QC and Michael Ryan successfully defend TCC claim against Engineers for professional negligence – 4 New Square Chambers

Posted July 31st, 2013 in costs, expert witnesses, negligence, news, surveyors by sally

“On 24 June 2013, Mr Justice Akenhead handed down judgment in Igloo Regeneration v Powell Williams Partnership [2013] EWHC 1718 (TCC). Anneliese Day QC and Michael Ryan acted for the successful defendant.”

Full story (PDF)

4 New Square Chambers, 17th July 2013

Source: www.4newsquare.com

Bedroom tax JR – NearlyLegal

“The headline here, as has been widely tweeted/flashed etc, is that the challenge to the bedroom tax contained in Regulation B13, Housing Benefit Regulations (both generically and specifically in relation to households with a disabled person) was unsuccessful in the Divisional Court (R(MA) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 2213 – not on Baili yet, but available to download from Adam Wagner’s site); but the Court came close to granting injunctive relief against the Secretary of State to make regulations bringing Burnip/Gorry into effect, as opposed to relying simply on a Circular. The DWP had argued that they were entitled to rely on guidance by way of Circular ‘pending a decision on whether and at what point in time to introduce regulations’ (Laws LJ’s emphasis). On that point, rarely have I read such strong words as appear in Laws LJ’s judgment at [91]-[92]. That is an ouch moment for the DWP which, I bet, will not be widely reported, so let me headline the quote here: ‘The Secretary of State has no business considering whether to introduce regulations to conform HB provision with the judgment in Gorry. He is obliged to do so.’ The only thing which stopped injunctive relief was that their drafting was ‘under consideration’ after 14 months (!).”

Full story

NearlyLegal, 3oth July 2013

Source: www.nearlylegal.co.uk

Regina (S and others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police – WLR Daily

Regina (S and others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police [2013] EWHC 2189 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 312

“The Divisional Court gave guidance on the practice to be followed on an application for a search warrant under the special procedure in section 9 of and Schedule 1 to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, and reiterated the information required to be supplied by a constable to the court on such an application, including the need to give full and frank disclosure.”

WLR Daily, 23rd July 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

DV3 RS Ltd Partnership v Revenue and Customs Comrs – WLR Daily

Posted July 31st, 2013 in law reports, leases, partnerships, sale of land, stamp duty, tax avoidance by sally

DV3 RS Ltd Partnership v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2013] EWCA Civ 907; [2013] WLR (D) 311

“Where a vendor contracted to sell a chargeable interest to a company and the company made a sub-sale to a partnership (of which the company was a member), both contracts being completed at the same time with sequential transfers, the partnership, as taxpayer, acquired a chargeable interest liable to stamp duty land tax.”

WLR Daily, 25th July 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Action on compensation claims for slips and trips – Ministry of Justice

Posted July 31st, 2013 in compensation, fees, health & safety, news, personal injuries, state liability by sally

“Schools, businesses and councils will all be helped by the latest stage of major law changes turning the tide on compensation culture.”

Full story

Ministry of Justice, 31st July 2013

Source: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice

Home Secretary extends consultation into use of stop and search – Home Office

Posted July 31st, 2013 in consultations, news, police, stop and search, time limits by sally

“Members of the public given an extra six weeks to have their say on stop and search after consultation extended to 24 September.”

Full story

Home Office, 30th July 2013

Source: www.gov.uk/home-office

ATE providers and unions – authors of their own misfortune? – Halsbury’s Law Exchange

Posted July 31st, 2013 in costs, insurance, legal aid, news, third parties, time limits, trade unions by sally

“We all know the gravy train is coming to an end. With the abolition of inter partes recovery of After the Event (ATE) premiums and equivalents, ATE providers and unions are scrambling to fill the void in their coffers this will create. Recently, there has been outrage at the suggestion that retrospective reform should be introduced to limit the recoverability of pre 1 April ATE premiums and equivalents, imposing a finite timescale. But is this really justified, or are the ATE providers and union funders bringing such measures on themselves by their disproportionate attitude to the quantum of premiums?”

Full story

Halsbury’s Law Exchange, 30th July 2013

Source: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk