Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co – WLR Daily

Posted April 22nd, 2013 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co (Case C–12/12); [2013] WLR (D) 143

“The condition of ‘genuine use’ of a trade mark, within the meaning of article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, was satisfied where a registered trade mark, which had become distinctive as a result of the use of another composite mark of which it constituted one of the elements, was used only through that other composite mark, or where it was used only in conjunction with another mark, and the combination of those two marks was, furthermore, itself registered as a trade mark.”

WLR Daily, 18th April 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Law Commission proposes changes to ‘groundless threats’ IP laws – OUT-LAW.com

“A law reform body has proposed changes to the law that would make it easier for businesses seeking to protect their trade marks and design rights to make threats of legal action against alleged infringers of their rights without fear that those threats could be the subject of court action.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 22nd April 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Courts can use hypothetical licensing arrangements to calculate trade mark damages, says High Court – OUT-LAW.com

Posted April 17th, 2013 in damages, gambling, internet, licensing, news, patents, trade marks by sally

“Courts can calculate trade mark infringement damages based on a hypothetical licensing arrangement, the High Court has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 17th April 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Patents, trade marks and design rights: are groundless threats of infringement causing problems? – Law Commission

Posted April 17th, 2013 in competition, consultations, intellectual property, news, patents, trade marks by sally

“In a consultation opening today, the Law Commission seeks views on reform of the law relating to groundless threats of litigation over patents, trade marks and design rights.”

Full story

Law Commission, 17th April 2013

Source: www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk

Regina v Hampshire County Council – WLR Daily

Regina v Hampshire County Council [2013] WLR (D) 117

“There was no reason to stay confiscation proceedings where a trademark offence had been committed, because trademark offences were lifestyle, repeat offences, which did real damage to those entitled to the profits of a trademark and deprived the manufacturers of the legitimate fruits of the research and development of their product and it was proceeds which mattered rather than blame.”

WLR Daily, 20th March 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2013 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza
(Case C-561/11); [2013] WLR (D) 75

The exclusive right of the proprietor of a Community trade mark conferred by article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 to prohibit all third parties from using, in the course of trade, signs identical with or similar to its trade mark extended to a third-party proprietor of a later registered Community trade mark, without the need for that later mark to have previously been declared invalid.

WLR Daily, 21st February 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Leno Merken BV v Hageldruis Beheer BV – WLR Daily

Posted December 21st, 2012 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by tracey

Leno Merken BV v Hageldruis Beheer BV: (Case C-149/11); [2012] WLR (D) 388

“The territorial borders of the member states should be disregarded in the assessment of whether a trade mark had been put to ‘genuine use in the Community’ within the meaning of article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community Trade Mark (OJ 2009 L78, p 1).”

WLR Daily, 19th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

YouView is sued over YourView naming dispute – BBC News

Posted November 26th, 2012 in injunctions, internet, news, telecommunications, trade marks, trade names by sally

“UK internet TV provider YouView has been sued for trademark infringement in a dispute over the product’s name.”

Full story

BBC News, 26th November 2012

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

YouView loses trademark appeal – The Guardian

Posted November 15th, 2012 in appeals, internet, media, news, trade marks by sally

“YouView, the much-delayed internet-connected TV service that finally launched earlier this year, may now have to change its name or face paying damages for trademark infringement after losing a high court appeal.”

Full story

The Guardian, 14th November 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

BSkyB wins high court trademark battle over Now TV name – The Guardian

Posted November 5th, 2012 in internet, media, news, trade marks by sally

“BSkyB has won a high court trademark battle over the name of its new internet TV service, Now TV.”

Full story

The Guardian, 2nd November 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Rintisch v Eder – WLR Daily

Posted October 26th, 2012 in EC law, food, law reports, trade marks by tracey

Rintisch v Eder: C-553/11;   [2012] WLR (D)  289

“Article 10(2)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the member states relating to trade marks meant that the proprietor of a registered trade mark was not precluded from relying, in order to establish use of the trade mark for the purposes of that provision, on the fact that it was used in a form which differed from the form in which it was registered, without the differences between the two forms altering the distinctive character of that trade mark, even though that different form was itself registered as a trade mark. The article precluded an interpretation of a national provision intended to transpose it into domestic law whereby article 10(2)(a) did not apply to a ‘defensive’ trade mark which was registered only in order to secure or expand the protection of another registered trade mark that is registered in the form in which it was used.”

WLR Daily, 25th October 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Cadbury hits a purple patch with legal victory to secure trademark – The Guardian

Posted October 3rd, 2012 in food, news, trade marks by sally

“Christian Louboutin has secured the trademark for the distinctive red used on the soles of shoes he designs, and the retailer Harrods has a trademark over the shade of green synonymous with its brand. Now confectionery giant Cadbury has won a lengthy court battle giving it the right to the trademark for the distinctive colour of purple it uses for the packaging of its milk chocolate.”

Full story

The Guardian, 2nd October 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Protecting creativity: new small claims track for IP cases – The Guardian

Posted October 2nd, 2012 in copyright, intellectual property, news, patents, small claims, trade marks by sally

“Until now taking legal action against others who copy creative work, brand names and logos or otherwise try to take advantage of someone else’s creativity has been beyond the reach of most people. That changes on Monday when the small claims track becomes available for intellectual property claims in England and Wales.”

Full story

The Guardian, 2nd October 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Pie Optiek SPRL v Bureau Gevers SA and others – WLR Daily

Posted July 23rd, 2012 in domain names, EC law, law reports, trade marks by tracey

Pie Optiek SPRL v Bureau Gevers SA and others: Case C-376/11;  [2012] WLR (D)  219

“The third sub-paragraph of article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration meant that, in a situation where the prior right concerned was a trade mark right, the words ‘licensees of prior rights’ did not refer to a person who had been authorised by the proprietor of the trade mark concerned solely to register, in his own name but on behalf of that proprietor, a domain name identical or similar to that trade mark, but without that person being authorised to use the trade mark commercially in a manner consistent with its functions.”

WLR Daily, 19th July 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Budéjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc – WLR Daily

Posted July 5th, 2012 in appeals, food, law reports, trade marks by sally

Budéjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 880; [2012] WLR (D) 190

“Where a longstanding situation of honest concurrent user of the same mark for goods had come about, each user could register its mark, and each could stop third parties from using it, but neither could stop the other.”

WLR Daily, 3rd July 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc – WLR Daily

Posted June 6th, 2012 in EC law, law reports, stay of proceedings, trade marks by tracey

Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc: [2012] EWCA Civ 729;   [2012] WLR (D)  166

“Where the proprietor of a registered Community design, the validity of which was already in issue in proceedings before the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) or another Community design court, brought a counterclaim alleging infringement of the design against a claimant who had issued a claim in a Community design court seeking a declaration of non-infringement, the stay of proceedings required by article 91(1) of the Community Design Regulation was a stay of the counterclaim, not the claim.”

WLR Daily, 30th May 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted April 25th, 2012 in advertising, EC law, internet, jurisdiction, law reports, trade marks by sally

Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (Case C-523/10); [2012] WLR (D) 117

“Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters meant that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a member state because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website operating under a country-specific top-level domain of another member state could be brought before either the courts of the member state in which the trade mark was registered or the courts of the member state of the place of establishment of the advertiser.”

WLR Daily, 19th April 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Branson wins right to own porn web address featuring his name – OUT-LAW.com

Posted February 22nd, 2012 in dispute resolution, domain names, internet, news, pornography, trade marks by sally

“An Australian man has been ordered to transfer his ownership of the richardbranson.xxx domain name to UK entrepreneur Richard Branson.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 22nd February 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted February 3rd, 2012 in EC law, food, law reports, trade marks by sally

Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20

“A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.”

WLR Daily, 15th December 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Court of Appeal dismisses William Hill’s 32Red appeal – The Lawyer

Posted January 26th, 2012 in appeals, gambling, news, trade marks by sally

“Bookmaker William Hill has lost an appeal against a High Court ruling that found the gambling giant’s online casino brand 32Vegas infringed a rival company’s trademarks.”

Full story

The Lawyer, 25th January 2012

Source: www.thelawyer.com