Ineos Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, other party) – WLR Daily

Posted February 24th, 2011 in burden of proof, EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Ineos Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, other party) (Case T-222/09); [2011] WLR (D) 53

“In opposition proceedings against registration of a trade mark pursuant to article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, the opposing party was not obliged to adduce evidence in support of the opposition. Whilst in relation to proceedings relating to relative grounds for refusal the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) could take into account facts which were likely to be known by anyone or which might be learned from generally accessible sources, it was not, however, entitled to exceed the conditions governing examination set out in article 74 of Regulation 40/94.”

WLR Daily, 23rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Trademark law: bar is lowered for claims of infringement – The Guardian

Posted November 1st, 2010 in news, trade marks by sally

“The US doctrine of ‘initial interest confusion’ applies in England, a court has decided.”

Full story

The Guardian, 29th October 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

High Court confirms ‘initial confusion’ as principle of EU trade mark law – OUT-LAW.com

Posted October 26th, 2010 in news, trade marks by sally

“Trade mark infringement can take place even if a buyer is only confused about one company appearing to be another at the very start of the purchasing process, the High Court has ruled.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 26th October 2010

Source: www.out-law.com

Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd and another v OCH Capital LLP and others – WLR Daily

Posted October 26th, 2010 in law reports, trade marks by sally

Och-Ziff Management Europe Ltd and another v OCH Capital LLP and others [2010] EWHC 2599 (Ch) ; [2010] WLR(D) 265

“Purely internal use of a trade mark by its proprietor was not ‘genuine use’ of that mark and that internal use was not ‘use’ of a mark as a trade mark at all. It was not use as part (or even preparatory to) a commercial communication with a third party.”

WLR Daily, 25th October 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Court of Appeal questions brand owners’ rights to block parallel imports – OUT-LAW.com

Posted August 26th, 2010 in news, parallel imports, trade marks by sally

“Brand owners may have less power to prevent sales in Europe of goods intended for other markets after a ruling by England’s Court of Appeal this week. The judgment over the sale of Sun-branded disk drives is likely to be welcomed by independent resellers.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 26th August 2010

Source: www.out-law.com

Google to allow trade marks as keywords across Europe – OUT-LAW.com

Posted August 4th, 2010 in advertising, internet, news, trade marks by sally

“Google will let companies use competitors’ trade marks as keywords to trigger search adverts in all European countries for the first time. The move will test the interpretation of a number of EU and national court rulings on the controversial practice.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 4th August 2010

Source: www.out-law.com

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others – WLR Daily

Posted May 25th, 2010 in advertising, appeals, law reports, trade marks by sally

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others [2010] EWCA Civ 535; [2010] WLR (D) 134

“The effect of the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European in L’Oréal SA v Bellure NVs (Case C-487/07) [2010] Bus LR 303 was that the use of comparative lists, whereby traders of smell-alike perfume products cited, for marketing purposes, the products in the market to which their own products smelt similar, was unlawful.”

WLR Daily, 24th May 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Man fined £26k over fake computer games – BBC News

“A man who sold fake computer games over the internet has been ordered to pay £26,405 following a proceeds of crime investigation.”

Full story

BBC News, 12th May 2010

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Hotel Cipriani Srl and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Steet) Ltd and others – WLR Daily

Posted March 5th, 2010 in appeals, hotels, law reports, trade marks, trade names by sally

Hotel Cipriani Srl and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Steet) Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 110; [2010] WLR (D) 64

“The ‘own name’ defence under art 12(a) of Council Regulation (EC) 40/94, whereby a community trade mark did not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using in the course of trade his own name and address, could be available in respect of a trading name, as well as a corporate name of a company, but it would depend on: (i) the actual trading name that had been adopted; (ii) the circumstances in which it had been adopted; and (iii) depending on the circumstances, whether the use was in accordance with honest practices.”

WLR Daily, 4th March 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Village People threaten lawsuit over Jamie Oliver advert – The Guardian

Posted December 18th, 2009 in media, news, trade marks by sally

“It could make for an interesting scenario: a construction worker, a cowboy, a traffic cop, a Native American chief, a sailor, Jamie Oliver, a leather queen, some lawyers and a judge – together in court.”

Full story

The Guardian, 18th December 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Firms settle trademark dispute – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 6th, 2009 in law firms, news, trade marks by sally

“Nottingham firm Paragon Law has forced West Bromwich and Peterborough firm Paragon Solicitors to change its name and pay legal costs after a trade mark dispute.”

Full story

Law Society’s Gazette, 5th November 2009

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) – WLR daily

Posted October 30th, 2009 in EC law, law reports, res judicata, trade marks by sally

Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-140/08); [2009] WLR (D) 308

“In proceedings concerning the alleged invalidity of a community trade mark, departments of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) are not bound by earlier final decisions in opposition proceedings, since no force of res judicata attaches to such decisions.”

WLR Daily, 29th October 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

 

Food mixer did not violate rival’s trade mark by using similar shape – OUT-LAW.com

Posted July 31st, 2009 in appeals, news, trade marks by sally

“A claim that one food mixer violated the trade mark rights of another by being similar in shape has failed. The Court of Appeal said that any similarity in shape between the machines had not given Kenwood an unfair advantage over Whirlpool.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 31st July 2009

Source: www.out-law.com

Britain’s biggest DVD pirates jailed – The Guardian

Posted July 29th, 2009 in conspiracy, copyright, news, sentencing, trade marks by sally

“A father and his two sons who kept dozens of Chinese workers in virtual slavery to run Britain’s biggest DVD piracy operation were jailed for a total of 16 years today.”

Full story

The Guardian, 28th July 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others – WLR Daily

Posted June 22nd, 2009 in advertising, EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others (Case C-487/07); [2009] WLR (D) 203

“The claimants, producers and marketers of luxury perfumes, were the proprietors in the United Kingdom of well-known trade marks, some in the form of word marks alone, and others being word and figurative marks including a representation of the bottle or packaging for the particular perfume. The defendants, the producer of and two companies which marketed imitations of fine fragrances, offered a range of products some of whose bottles and packaging were generally similar to those of products of the claimants’, although it was common ground that the similarity was unlikely to mislead professionals or the public. The defendant marketing companies provided to their retailers lists which compared the smell of a product of the defendants’ with a product of the claimants’ which was being imitated, in each case identified by reference to the word mark by which the product was known. In trade mark infringement proceedings brought by the claimants, a number of issues arose relating to the interpretation of (i) Council Directive 89/104/EEC on trade marks and (ii) article 3a(1) of Council Directive 84/450/EEC on misleading and comparative advertising as amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/55/EC (‘Directive 84/450’), and the Chancery Division of the High Court referred questions thereon to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.”

WLR Daily, 19th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH – WLR Daily

Posted June 15th, 2009 in EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (Case C-529/07); [2009] WLR (D) 182

“The fact that, at the time of applying for registration of a sign as a trade mark, the applicant knew or was to be taken as knowing that an identical or similar sign capable of being confused with the applicant’s sign was being used by others for an identical or similar product, could constitute bad faith on the applicant’s part rendering the registration amenable to a declaration of invalidity.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

LastMinute.com wins right to block last minute trade mark – OUT-LAW.com

Posted June 12th, 2009 in EC law, news, trade marks by sally

“Online travel company LastMinute.com has won the right to have a competing firm’s European trade mark cancelled. The European Union’s Court of First Instance (CFI) has backed the British firm, overturning a ruling by the EU office for trade marks.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 11th June 2009

Source: www.out-law.com

EBay has ‘no legal duty’ to protect others’ trade marks, says High Court – OUT-LAW.com

Posted May 29th, 2009 in internet, news, trade marks by sally

“Online auction site eBay has ‘no legal duty’ to protect other companies’ trade marks or stop its sellers from infringing them, the High Court has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 26th May 2009

Source: www.out-law.com

ECJ rulings on Google keywords might not resolve controversy, warns High Court – OUT-LAW.com

Posted May 27th, 2009 in advertising, EC law, internet, news, trade marks by sally

“A widely-requested European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on keyword advertising may fail to give businesses in the UK and Ireland the legal clarity it would give to the rest of Europe, a High Court judge has warned.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 26th May 2009

Source: www.out-law.com

Regina v Kousar – Times Law Reports

Regina v Kousar

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“A wife who knew her husband was storing business merchandise in the matrimonial home, acquiesced in it being there and did not demand its removal, was not in control or possession of the goods.”

The Times, 25th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.