BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 30th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Akman, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1087 (15 May 2009)

Yemoh & Ors v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 930 (22 May 2009)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Withers LLP [2009] EWHC 1531 (Ch) (29 June 2009)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Birmingham & Solihull Taxi Association & Anor, R (on the application of) v Birmingham International Airport Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 1462 (Admin) (23 June 2009)

Cannan v HMP Full Sutton [2009] EWHC 1517 (Admin) (29 June 2009)

High Court (Family Division)

AAA v ASH [2009] EWHC 636 (Fam) (27 March 2009)

Spencer v Spencer [2009] EWHC 1529 (Fam) (23 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

Seaga v Harper (No 2) – WLR Daily

Posted June 30th, 2009 in costs, fees, insurance, Jamaica, law reports, Privy Council by sally

Seaga v Harper (No 2) [2009] UKPC 26; [2009] WLR (D) 212

“Success fees under conditional fee agreements, and premiums paid on ‘after the event’ (‘ATE’) insurance cover were not recoverable as costs by a successful party in an appeal to the Privy Council from Jamaica whose domestic law did not allow conditional fee agreements or permit expenditure on ATE premiums to be an allowable disbursement.”

WLR Daily, 29th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Bloom and others v Harms Offshore AHT “Taurus” GmbH & Co KG and another – WLR Daily

Posted June 30th, 2009 in injunctions, insolvency, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

Bloom and others v Harms Offshore AHT “Taurus” GmbH & Co KG and another [2009] EWCA Civ 632; [2009] WLR (D) 211

“Where creditors had, in a foreign jurisdiction, attached certain property owned by a company in administration, the comity owed by the courts of different jurisdictions to each other would normally make it inappropriate for the municipal courts to grant injunctive relief affecting procedures in a court of foreign jurisdiction. However, due regard to certain relevant factors, such as the conduct of the creditors against whom the injunction was sought and the circumstances of the attachment, might justify the grant of an injunction.”

WLR Daily, 29th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 29th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Progress Property Company Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 629 (26 June 2009)

Beer & Anor v Bexbes LLP [2009] EWCA Civ 628 (26 June 2009)

EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630 (26 June 2009)

Armsden v Kent Police [2009] EWCA Civ 631 (26 June 2009)

Harms Offshore Aht “Taurus” GmbH & Co Kg v Bloom & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 632 (26 June 2009)

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Beck [2009] EWCA Civ 619 (26 June 2009)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Vestergaard Frandsen A/S & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 1456 (Ch) (26 June 2009)

Digicel (St. Lucia) Ltd & Ors v Cable & Wireless Plc & Ors [2009] EWHC 1437 (Ch) (17 June 2009)

Norwich City College of Further and Higher Education v McQuillin & Anor [2009] EWHC 1496 (Ch) (26 June 2009)

High Court (Family Division)

Leicestershire County Council v K C & Ors [2009] EWHC 1383 (Fam) (29 January 2009)

High Court (Admiralty Division)

“Western Neptune” Et Al, Owners, Demise Charterers & Time Charterers of the Ship v “Philadelphia Express”, Owners & Demise Charterers of the Ship [2009] EWHC 1522 (Admlty) (26 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 29th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Branchflower, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1239 (20 May 2009)

Clarke, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1228 (21 May 2009)

Seager, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1303 (26 June 2009)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Swift Technical Group Holdings Ltd & Ors v Mulcahy [2009] EWHC 1485 (QB) (08 June 2009)

Lockheed Martin Group v Willis Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 1436 (QB) (09 June 2009)

B v Reading Borough Council & Ors [2009] EWHC 998 (QB) (24 June 2009)

Rig Holdings LP v Aeroflex Test Solutions Ltd [2009] EWHC 1440 (QB) (25 June 2009)

Peters & Anor v Andrew [2009] EWHC 1511 (QB) (26 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 26th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

James, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1261 (25 June 2009)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd & Ors v Fattal & Ors [2009] EWHC 1446 (Ch) (25 June 2009)

High Court (Admiralty Division)

Western Neptune (Owners, Demise Charters and Time Charterers of) v Owners and Demise Charterers of the Philadelphia Express [2009] EWHC 1274 (Admlty) (25 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

Vodafone2 v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs – Times Law Reports

Posted June 26th, 2009 in corporation tax, EC law, freedom of establishment, law reports by sally

Vodafone2 v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs

Court of Appeal

“In order to interpret United Kingdom legislation concerning the profits of controlled foreign companies in a way which avoided any unlawful restriction of a taxpayer company’s right to freedom of establishment, conferred by article 43 of the European Treaty, the court was entitled to introduce an additional exception to those contained in section 748(1)(a) to (e) and (3) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988.”

The Times, 26th June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina v Fazal – Times Law Reports

Posted June 26th, 2009 in conversion, law reports, proceeds of crime by sally

Regina v Fazal

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“A defendant who allowed another person, B, to lodge, receive, retain or withdraw money which amounted to criminal property from the defendant’s bank account, was to be regarded as having criminally converted that property.”

The Times, 26th June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 25th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

QD (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 620 (24 June 2009)

P and P (Children), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 610 (24 June 2009)

Reeves v Blake [2009] EWCA Civ 611 (24 June 2009)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Johnson v MGN Ltd [2009] EWHC 1481 (QB) (24 June 2009)

Marketmaker Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd & Ors v CMC Group Plc & Ors [2009] EWHC 1445 (QB) (24 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org.

In re P-J (Children) (Abduction: Consent) – WLR daily

Posted June 25th, 2009 in child abduction, consent, law reports by sally

In re P-J (Children) (Abduction: Consent) [2009] EWCA Civ 588; [2009] WLR (D) 207

“Effective ‘consent’ to the removal of a child from the jurisdiction of the state of its habitual residence could in principle be given in advance by an eligible person. However, for reliance to be placed on the terms of art 13(a) of the Hague Convention, whereby a requested state was not bound to order the return of such a child if the person having care of the person of the child had ‘consented to or subsequently acquiesced in’ the removal, the consent had to subsist at the time when the child was in fact removed.”

WLR Daily, 23rd June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Twomey (John); Regina v Blake (Peter); Regina v Cameron (Glen); Regina v Hibberd (Barry) – Times Law Reports

Posted June 25th, 2009 in human rights, intimidation, juries, law reports, trial without jury by sally

Regina v Twomey (John); Regina v Blake (Peter); Regina v Cameron (Glen); Regina v Hibberd (Barry)

Court of Appeal

“A defendant’s right to a fair trial was not prejudiced by holding a criminal trial without a jury, where the danger of jury tampering was very significant and was not sufficiently addressed by proposed protective measures.”

The Times, 25th June 2009

Source; www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 24th, 2009 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

G(G) & Anor, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1207 (12 June 2009)

DT, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1213 (04 June 2009)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 613 (23 June 2009)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Estafnous v London & Leeds Business Centres Ltd. [2009] EWHC 1308 (Ch) (15 June 2009)

MCP Pension Trustees Ltd v AON Pension Trustees Ltd [2009] EWHC 1351 (Ch) (18 June 2009)

Curtis & Ors v Pulbrook & Anor [2009] EWHC 1370 (Ch) (17 June 2009)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Mohammed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1402 (Admin) (08 June 2009)

Onwuzulike v United States of America [2009] EWHC 1395 (Admin) (05 June 2009)

Boahen, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1407 (Admin) (05 June 2009)

Schwartz v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court [2009] EWHC 1397 (Admin) (03 June 2009)

Ambassador Cars Ltd., R (on the application of) v Central Criminal Court [2009] EWHC 1325 (Admin) (03 June 2009)

Kallmi v Albania [2009] EWHC 1411 (Admin) (02 June 2009)

Tilson v New Zealand [2009] EWHC 1410 (Admin) (02 June 2009)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Imperial Cancer Research Fund & Anor v OVE ARUP & Partners Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 1453 (TCC) (23 June 2009)

North Midland Construction Plc v A E & E Lentjes UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 1371 (TCC) (18 June 2009)

Farm Assist Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (No.2) [2009] EWHC 1102 (TCC) (19 May 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

TRM Copy Centres Ltd v Lanwall Services Ltd – Times Law Reports

Posted June 24th, 2009 in bailment, consumer credit, contracts, law reports by sally

TRM Copy Centres Ltd v Lanwall Services Ltd

House of Lords

“The essence of hire was that the hirer acquired the use and possession of goods from the provider in return for a rent, whether payable in cash or kind.”

The Times, 24th June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina (Miller and another) v Independent Assessor – WLR Daily

Posted June 23rd, 2009 in compensation, law reports, miscarriage of justice by sally

Regina (Miller and another) v Independent Assessor [2009] EWCA Civ 609; [2009] WLR (D) 206

“In assessing the compensation payable to a victim of miscarriage of justice who in consequence had served a term of imprisonment, the independent assessor should apply principles of other civil awards in respect of similar wrongs in order to achieve legal consistency with earlier decisions, having regard to the gravity of the offence of which the victim had been wrongly convicted and the period of his incarceration.”

WLR Daily, 22nd June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Andrew Brown v Innovatorone plc and others – WLR Daily

Posted June 23rd, 2009 in law reports, service, solicitors by sally

Andrew Brown v Innovatorone plc and others [2009] EWHC 1376 (Comm); [2009] WLR (D) 205

“A claim form was not effectively served on a solicitor where the solicitor had not notified the claimant in writing that the solicitor had been instructed by the defendant to accept service on behalf of the defendant, and, while it did not require exceptional circumstances for exercise of the court’s power to authorise service by an alternative method to those specifically permitted, a rigorous approach was to be taken to the issue whether there was good reason to exercise that power.”

WLR Daily, 22nd June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v McQuoid – Times Law Reports

Posted June 23rd, 2009 in fraud, insider dealing, law reports by sally

Regina v McQuoid

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Deliberate insider dealing was a species of fraud for which prosecution, rather than regulatory proceedings, would often be more appropriate.”

The Times, 23rd June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

AS (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – Times Law Reports

Posted June 23rd, 2009 in appeals, children, immigration, law reports by sally

AS (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

House of Lords

“The statutory provision that on hearing an appeal against a refusal of entry clearance the adjudicator or tribunal could have regard only to the circumstances appertaining at the time of the decision to refuse and could have no regard to any subsequent change in the applicant’s circumstances, was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, even though its effect could lead to delay in bringing a family together in the United Kingdom.”

The Times, 22nd June 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 22nd, 2009 in law reports by sally

High Court (Family Division)

McFarlane v McFarlane [2009] EWHC 891 (Fam) (18 June 2009)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Owens v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2009] EWHC 1343 (Admin) (08 June 2009)

Wilson & Anor v Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority [2009] EWHC 1425 (Admin) (19 June 2009)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Brown & Ors v Innovatorone Plc & Ors [2009] EWHC 1376 (Comm) (19 June 2009)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Roundstone Nurseries Ltd v Stephenson Holdings Ltd [2009] EWHC 1431 (TCC) (10 June 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org

Owens v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court – WLR Daily

Posted June 22nd, 2009 in appeals, delay, extradition, law reports, time limits by sally

Owens v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2009] EWHC 1343 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 20

“When an appeal to the High Court under s 26 of the Extradition Act 2003 against an order for extradition to a category 1 territory was unsuccessful, the decision of the High Court on the appeal did not become final within the meaning of s 36(5) of the Act and, accordingly, the 10-day period within which s 36(2) and (3)(a) stipulated that extradition should take place did not begin to run until the 14-day period permitted by s 32(5) for applying to the High Court for leave to appeal to the House of Lords had expired, notwithstanding that the High Court had on the same day as dismissing the appeal declined to certify for the purposes of s 32(4)(a) of the Act that a point of law of general public importance was involved. As regards the requirement in s 36(8) that ‘reasonable cause’ be shown for delay in effecting extradition, the expression could be construed as being sufficiently broad to cover a short delay arising from an error of law made by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (‘SOCA’), the body responsible for the surrender of individuals to requesting states at the conclusion of extradition proceedings under the 2003 Act, in calculating the period within which the person must be extradited as specified in s 36(3) of the Act.”

WLR Daily, 19th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others – WLR Daily

Posted June 22nd, 2009 in advertising, EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

L’Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others (Case C-487/07); [2009] WLR (D) 203

“The claimants, producers and marketers of luxury perfumes, were the proprietors in the United Kingdom of well-known trade marks, some in the form of word marks alone, and others being word and figurative marks including a representation of the bottle or packaging for the particular perfume. The defendants, the producer of and two companies which marketed imitations of fine fragrances, offered a range of products some of whose bottles and packaging were generally similar to those of products of the claimants’, although it was common ground that the similarity was unlikely to mislead professionals or the public. The defendant marketing companies provided to their retailers lists which compared the smell of a product of the defendants’ with a product of the claimants’ which was being imitated, in each case identified by reference to the word mark by which the product was known. In trade mark infringement proceedings brought by the claimants, a number of issues arose relating to the interpretation of (i) Council Directive 89/104/EEC on trade marks and (ii) article 3a(1) of Council Directive 84/450/EEC on misleading and comparative advertising as amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/55/EC (‘Directive 84/450’), and the Chancery Division of the High Court referred questions thereon to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.”

WLR Daily, 19th June 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.