Catgate: another myth used to trash human rights – The Guardian

Posted October 5th, 2011 in animals, deportation, families, human rights, immigration, news, partnerships by sally

“The home secretary is wrong,the decision not to deport an illegal immigrant had nothing to do with the pet cat.”

Full story

The Guardian, 4th October 2011

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Related link: Theresa May’s twisted tale of a Bolivian’s cat

Firm loses ‘partner’ employment appeal – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted July 28th, 2011 in appeals, employment tribunals, law firms, news, partnerships by tracey

“A solicitor who was paid through a profit share rather than receiving a salary should not be classified as a partner for employment law purposes, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled.”

Full story

Law Society’s Gazette, 28th July 2011

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

 

Drake v Harvey and others – WLR Daily

Posted July 25th, 2011 in appeals, law reports, partnerships, valuation by tracey

Drake v Harvey and others [2011] EWCA Civ 838;  [2011] WLR (D)  244

“There was no general default rule or presumption that the basis on which an outgoing partner’s share of partnership assets was to be determined was a fair value unless the partnership deed expressly stated otherwise; the correct approach was to derive the basis of valuation from the terms of the deed itself applying normal principles of contractual interpretation.”

WLR Daily, 20th July 2011

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP – WLR Daily

Posted July 22nd, 2011 in contracts, hedge funds, jurisdiction, law reports, partnerships by sally

Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 826 ; [2011] WLR (D) 235

“In any case where a dispute arose as to the jurisdiction of an expert, a court was the final decision maker as to whether the expert had jurisdiction, even if a clause purported to confer that jurisdiction on the expert in a manner that was final and binding.”

WLR Daily, 18th July 2011

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Inversiones Frieira SL and another v Colyzeo Investors II LP and another – WLR Daily

Posted July 18th, 2011 in law reports, partnerships by sally

Inversiones Frieira SL and another v Colyzeo Investors II LP and another [2011] EWHC 1762 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 227

“The legal structure of a collective investment scheme was that of a partnership and the legal rights of the investors were determined by that legal structure and not by the economic purpose.”

WLR Daily, 14th July 2011

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners – WLR Daily

Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKSC 19;  [2011] WLR (D)  154

“At the hearing of a taxpayer’s appeal against a closure notice determining an inquiry into a limited liability partnership’s tax return, the revenue was not confined to relying on the precise reasons for the decision given by the investigating officer in his closure notice.”

WLR Daily, 11th May 2011

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed

Lawyers are right to be cautious about going public – The Guardian

Posted May 6th, 2011 in law firms, news, partnerships by sally

“The rewards can be big, but firms seeking to become public companies face significant hurdles.”

Full story

The Guardian, 5th May 2011

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Fixed share partners are not employees, EAT rules – The Lawyer

Posted November 26th, 2010 in employment, law firms, national insurance, news, partnerships by sally

“An attempt to have fixed share partners legally defined as employees has failed at the Employment Appeal Tribunal.”

Full story

The Lawyer, 26th November 2010

Source: www.thelawyer.com

Law firms to allow non-lawyer partners – Ministry of Justice

Posted March 31st, 2009 in law firms, news, partnerships by sally

“Measures to improve the service that legal firms can give to consumers come into effect today.”

Full story

Ministry of Justice, 31st March 2009

Source: www.justice.gov.uk

Tann v Herrington – WLR Daily

Posted March 12th, 2009 in insurance, law reports, negligence, partnerships by sally

Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 89

Where a partner entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all aspects of the firm’s professional indemnity insurance failed to fulfil his obligations, a liability in damages to a client, for which the firm’s professional indemnity insurer had refused indemnity, was a liability to be borne personally by the partner because he was responsible for notifying the insurers that a claim had been made and his delay in doing so caused the refusal of indemnity.”

WLR Daily, 11th March 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

In re Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP; Vermillion International Investments Ltd v Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP – WLR Daily

Posted February 18th, 2009 in insolvency, law reports, locus standi, partnerships, winding up by sally

In re Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP; Vermillion International Investments Ltd v Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP; [2009] WLR (D) 57

“Although the interests and liabilities of a member of a limited liability partnership were different from those of a contributory to a limited company and those differences might lead to some changes in practice so far as petitions to wind them up were concerned, a person seeking to exercise a right to appear and be heard in court proceedings, whether as creditor or contributory, should at least claim to be a member of the class on whom that right was conferred.”

WLR Daily, 17th February 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Hard times spark falling-out of partners in leading law firms – The Times

Posted January 6th, 2009 in law firms, news, partnerships by sally

“Once regarded as secure for life, partners in Britain’s leading law firms are now being presented with a stark choice: prove your worth or leave. Almost 2,000 of them could go.”

Full story

The Times, 6th January 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Law firm bypasses banks to protect partners’ payouts – The Times

Posted December 5th, 2008 in law firms, news, partnerships, remuneration by sally

“A leading UK law firm has paid its partners £12 million in profits ahead of schedule because it believes that the money will be safer in private rather than corporate bank accounts.”

Full story

The Times, 5th December 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Partners at UK’s ten biggest law firms take home £1.1m in profits – The Times

Posted November 19th, 2008 in law firms, news, partnerships, remuneration by sally

“Partners at Britain’s ten biggest law firms took home an average of £1.1 million in profits last year.”

Full story

The Times, 19th November 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina v W. Stevenson & Sons (a Partnership) – Times Law Reports

Posted March 5th, 2008 in criminal responsibility, law reports, partnerships by sally

Regina v W. Stevenson & Sons (a Partnership)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Legislation could render a partnership criminally liable as a separate entity from its individual partners. However, confiscation proceedings could not properly be brought against the partners’ personal assets on the basis of the partnership’s conviction.”

The Times, 5th March 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) – WLR Daily

Posted February 27th, 2008 in criminal responsibility, law reports, partnerships by sally

R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) [2008] EWCA Crim 273; WLR (D) 60

“Legislation could render a partnership criminally liable as a separate entity from its individual partners. However, confiscation proceedings could not properly be brought against the personal assets of the partners on the basis of the partnership’s conviction.”

WLR Daily, 26th February 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Women partners up as long-term prospects improve – Legal Week

Posted February 25th, 2008 in law firms, news, partnerships, women by sally

“The proportion of female partners at UK law firms rose by more than 5% between 2006 and 2007, according to new research, although women still represent less than a quarter of all partners in private practice.”

Full story

Legal Week, 22nd February 2008

Source: www.legalweek.com

SRA ponders test for non-lawyer partners – Legal Week

Posted January 11th, 2008 in law firms, news, partnerships by sally

“The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is to consult on plans for a ‘suitability test’ for non-lawyer partners in law firms in the wake of the Legal Services Act.”

Full story

Legal Week, 10th January 2008

Source: www.legalweek.com

A shame for Peter Bloxham, but not for the profession – The Times

Posted October 17th, 2007 in age discrimination, law firms, partnerships, pensions, special report by sally

“It was intriguing that the loudest sighs of relief after Peter Bloxham lost his age discrimination claim against his former partners at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer last week were from lawyers nearer the end than the start of their careers.”

Full story

The Times, 17th October 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk  

City lawyers united on benefits of non-legal staff becoming partners – Legal Week

Posted September 20th, 2007 in law firms, news, partnerships by sally

“Ninety-three percent of lawyers agree on the potential management benefits of non-law professionals joining firm partnerships — but they remain wary of introducing multi-disciplinary models. James Illman reports on the findings of the latest Big Question survey.”

Full story

Legal Week, 20th September 2007

Source: www.legalweek.com