law reports – Page 143 – Current Awareness

“Where a broker had negligently advised a client to take out an interest-only mortgage and make an investment in foreign property in the expectation that the investment would pay off the entirety of the mortgage, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd was required to take into account both elements of the advice when assessing the client’s compensation for the broker’s breach of duty as a mortgage adviser under the scheme’s rules.”

WLR Daily, 18th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Cravecrest Ltd v Trustees of the Will of the Second Duke of Westminster and another – WLR Daily

Posted June 21st, 2013 in appeals, enfranchisement, landlord & tenant, law reports, leases, valuation, wills by sally

Cravecrest Ltd v Trustees of the Will of the Second Duke of Westminster and another: [2013] EWCA Civ 731; [2013] WLR (D) 243

“Where there were intermediate leases which subsisted between the freehold and the leases of the participating tenants and which were to be acquired by the nominee purchaser on the collective enfranchisement, and a single owner of those leases or of those leases and the freehold could realise development value by developing the property for use other than as a building containing separate flats, the hope of realising such development value had to be taken into account in fixing the price to be paid for the intermediate leases.”

WLR Daily, 19th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 20th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2013] UKSC 40 (19 June 2013)

Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 (19 June 2013)

Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No. 1) [2013] UKSC 38 (19 June 2013)

Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39 (19 June 2013)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Walsh v Shanahan & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 675 (19 June 2013)

Cravecrest Ltd. v Second Duke of Westminster, Trustees of the Will of & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 731 (19 June 2013)

Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corporation & Ors v Lembergs [2013] EWCA Civ 730 (19 June 2013)

Frost v Wake Smith and Tofields Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 1960 (19 June 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

The Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Company Ltd v Cowling & Anor [2013] EWHC 1720 (QB) (19 June 2013)

Loughlin v Singh & Ors [2013] EWHC 1641 (QB) (19 June 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

McNally, In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 [2013] EWHC 1685 (Ch) (17 June 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Duffy, R (on the application of) v HM Deputy Coroner for the County of Worcestershire & Anor [2013] EWHC 1654 (Admin) (19 June 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

British Airways Plc & Anor v Sindicato Espanol De Pilotos De Lineas Aereas & Anor [2013] EWHC 1657 (Comm) (20 June 2013)

Telfer v Sakellarios [2013] EWHC 1556 (Comm) (19 June 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

Cusack (Respondent) v London Borough of Harrow (Appellant) – Supreme Court

Posted June 20th, 2013 in appeals, compensation, injunctions, law reports, local government, roads, solicitors, Supreme Court by sally

Cusack (Respondent) v London Borough of Harrow (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 40 | UKSC 2012/0006 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 19th June 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Smith and Others (Appellants) v The Ministry of Defence (Respondent); Ellis and another (FC) (Respondents) v Ministry of Defence (Appellant); Allbutt and others (FC) (Respondents) v The Ministry of Defence (Appellant) – Supreme Court

Posted June 20th, 2013 in appeals, armed forces, government departments, human rights, law reports, negligence, Supreme Court by sally

Smith and Others (Appellants) v The Ministry of Defence (Respondent); Ellis and another (FC) (Respondents) v Ministry of Defence (Appellant); Allbutt and others (FC) (Respondents) v The Ministry of Defence (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 41 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 19th June 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

Bank Mellat (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Respondent) (1); Bank Mellat (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Respondent) (2) – Supreme Court

Posted June 20th, 2013 in appeals, banking, closed material, evidence, law reports, Supreme Court, terrorism by sally

Bank Mellat (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Respondent) (1); Bank Mellat (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Respondent) (2) UKSC 2011/0040 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 19th June 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt

French v Public Prosecutor of the Central Department of Investigation and Prosecution in Lisbon, Portugal – WLR Daily

Posted June 20th, 2013 in appeals, EC law, extradition, law reports, Privy Council, time limits, warrants by sally

French v Public Prosecutor of the Central Department of Investigation and Prosecution in Lisbon, Portugal [2013] UKPC 16; [2013] WLR (D) 241

“Although, as a matter of international obligation, a member state (and any European territory for which it was responsible) was required to legislate in such a way as to achieve the aims of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA , including that a formal decision on the execution of an European arrest warrant should be taken within 60 days of the requested person’s arrest, the law derived from the consequential domestic legislation rather than from the Decision, so that where a territory’s legislation provided that the consequence of a failure to meet such deadline was no more than a requirement to notify the issuing judicial authority of the delay and the reasons therefor, the failure did not entitle the arrested person to be released, save where the delay was so excessive that it could no longer be said to be a deprivation of liberty in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law for the lawful detention of a person against whom action was being taken with a view to extradition, within article 5.1(f) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.”

WLR Daily, 13th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina v N (Z) – WLR Daily

Posted June 20th, 2013 in appeals, attempts, crime, intimidation, law reports by sally

Regina v N (Z) [2013] EWCA Crim 989 ; [2013] WLR (D) 240

“For the offence of intimidation contrary to section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to be established, it had to be proved by the prosecution that the person whom the defendant intended to intimidate was in fact intimidated.”

WLR Daily, 18th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Smith and others v Ministry of Defence (JUSTICE and another intervening); Ellis and another v Same; Allbutt and others v Same – WLR Daily

Posted June 20th, 2013 in armed forces, government departments, human rights, law reports, negligence, Supreme Court by sally

Smith and others v Ministry of Defence (JUSTICE and another intervening); Ellis and another v Same; Allbutt and others v Same [2013] UKSC 41; [2013] WLR (D) 239

“Members of the United Kingdom’s armed forces serving in Iraq were within the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom for the purposes of article 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Whether claims alleging breaches of the right to life protected by article 2 could be sustained would depend on the particular circumstances.”

WLR Daily, 19th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Derek Hodd Ltd v Climate Change Capital Ltd – WLR Daily

Posted June 20th, 2013 in contracts, interpretation, law reports by sally

Derek Hodd Ltd v Climate Change Capital Ltd [2013] EWHC 1665 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 238

“Where there had been a misnomer of a party to an agreement the court was able to take into account the same evidence of the background as would be admissible for the purpose of interpreting the contract, including any relevant course of dealing between the parties.”

WLR Daily, 14th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisons

Posted June 19th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Lodge, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 987 (18 June 2013)

ZN, R v [2013] EWCA Crim 989 (18 June 2013)

Hussain, R. v (unauthorised disclosure of a draft judgment) (Rev 1) [2013] EWCA Crim 990 (10 May 2013)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Cronin v The Greyhound Board of Great Britain Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 668 (18 June 2013)

Emptage v Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 729 (18 June 2013)

High Court (Family Division)

B v B [2013] EWHC 1232 (Fam) (21 May 2013)

A (A Child) (Vulnerable Witness), Re [2013] EWHC 1694 (Fam) (17 June 2013)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

White Digital Media Ltd v Weaver & Anor [2013] EWHC 1681 (QB) (18 June 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Barden v Commodities Research Unit & Ors [2013] EWHC 1633 (Ch) (18 June 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Mengesha v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2013] EWHC 1695 (Admin) (18 June 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

Prest v Prest and others – WLR Daily

Posted June 19th, 2013 in assets recovery, company law, corporate veil, divorce, family courts, financial provision, law reports, legal personality, matrimonial home by sally

Prest v Prest and others [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] WLR (D) 237

“If a person was under an existing legal obligation or liability, or subject to an existing legal restriction, which he deliberately evaded or the enforcement he deliberately frustrated by interposing a company under his control, the court could ‘pierce the corporate veil’ but only for the purpose of depriving the company or its controller of the advantage which they would otherwise have obtained by the company’s separate legal personality.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted June 18th, 2013 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Kohli v Lit & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 667 (17 June 2013)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Avon Estates Ltd v Evans & Anor [2013] EWHC 1635 (Ch) (13 June 2013)

Derek Hodd Ltd v Climate Change Capital Ltd [2013] EWHC 1665 (Ch) (14 June 2013)

High Court (Family Division)

L and M (Children), Re [2013] EWHC 1569 (Fam) (04 June 2013)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Hartleyburn Parish Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2013] EWHC 1650 (Admin) (14 June 2013)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Bate v Aviva Insurance UK Ltd [2013] EWHC 1687 (Comm) (17 June 2013)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Hills Contractors & Construction Ltd v Struth & Anor [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC) (17 June 2013)

Source: www.bailii.org

In re MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration) (No 3); MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration) v Heis and others – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in administration orders, administrators, insolvency, law reports, trusts by sally

In re MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration) (No 3); MF Global UK Ltd (in special administration) v Heis and others [2013] EWHC 1655 (Ch); [2013] WLR (D) 236

“The court had an inherent jurisdiction to give such directions as would enable the administrators of a regulated investment firm, holding client money under rules imposing a statutory trust, to put in place a client money distribution procedure for dealing with rejected claims and unknown claims which could provide a degree of certainty and protection and ensure a timely return of client money.”

WLR Daily, 14th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in appeals, deposits, landlord & tenant, law reports by sally

Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013] EWCA Civ 669; [2013] WLR (D) 235

“Where a tenant had paid a deposit under an assured shorthold tenancy for a fixed term which began before, but ended after, the commencement of section 213 of the Housing Act 2004, the landlord was obliged to deal with the deposit in accordance with an authorised scheme within 14 days of the coming into being of a new statutory periodic tenancy upon expiry of the fixed term; and by virtue of section 215(1) of the 2004 Act, non-compliance with that obligation precluded service by the landlord of a valid notice under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988.”

WLR Daily, 14th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Regina (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in appeals, commons, human rights, law reports, local government by sally

Regina (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2013] EWCA Civ 673 ; [2013] WLR (D) 234

“The provision in section 15(4) of the Commons Act 2006, allowing an application for registration of land as a town or village green to be made up to five years after a cessation of qualifying user predating the commencement of section 15, was not incompatible with the landowner’s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.”

WLR Daily, 14th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Piepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH & Co KG v Kreis Düren (Stadt Düren intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in contracts, EC law, law reports, local government, public procurement by sally

Piepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH & Co KG v Kreis Düren (Stadt Düren intervening) (Case C-386/11); [2013] WLR (D) 233

“A contract whereby (without establishing co-operation between the contracting public entities with a view to carrying out a public service task that both of them had to perform)—one public entity had assigned to another the task of cleaning certain public buildings, while reserving a supervisory power, in return for payment for the costs incurred, the second entity being authorised to use the services of third parties which might be capable of competing on the market for the accomplishment of that task—constituted a public service contract within the meaning of article 1(2)(d) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC.”

WLR Daily, 13th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in appeals, arbitration, foreign jurisdictions, injunctions, law reports, Supreme Court by sally

AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2013] UKSC 35; [2013] WLR (D) 232

“The English court had a long-standing and well-established jurisdiction to grant an injunction restraining the commencement or continuation of foreign proceedings brought in breach of an arbitration clause, even when neither party had commenced, nor intended to commence, arbitration proceedings in the agreed forum. The Arbitration Act 1996 did not affect the court’s power under that jurisdiction or under s 37 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.”

WLR Daily, 12th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

O’Neill v HM Advocate (No 2); Lauchlanv Same – WLR Daily

Posted June 18th, 2013 in cautions, human rights, judges, law reports, Scotland, Supreme Court, time limits, trials by sally

O’Neill v HM Advocate (No 2); Lauchlanv Same [2013] UKSC 36; [2013] WLR (D) 231

“The right to a trial within a reasonable time under article 6.1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was a separate right from the right to a fair trial under that article. Consequently the time when a person was ‘charged’ with an offence for the purposes of time starting to run under the reasonable time guarantee might be different from the time when he should have had access to a lawyer for the purposes of ensuring a fair trial under article 6.1 read with article 6.3(c).”

WLR Daily, 13th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk