High Court rejects BBC’s bid to move Paradise Papers case to media list – Litigation Futures

Posted January 29th, 2018 in BBC, civil procedure rules, courts, documents, media, news by sally

‘Offshore law firm Appleby has won the first skirmish in its case against the BBC and The Guardian newspaper over the ‘Paradise Papers’ leak, after the High Court refused the defendants’ bid to move the case from the Chancery Division to the media and communications list.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 29th January 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Radical new disclosure regime to ‘spell out’ lawyers’ duties – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted January 19th, 2018 in civil procedure rules, disclosure, news by tracey

‘A radical new disclosure regime for the Business and Property Courts will have a “far-reaching effect on civil litigation”, a leading City lawyer has claimed.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 18th January 2018

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Pre-action disclosure of insurance policies – Law Society’s Gazette

‘Peel Port Shareholder Finance Company Ltd v Dornoch Ltd [2017] EWHC 876 (TCC) serves as a reminder of the court’s approach to the rules on pre-action disclosure and the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 act).’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 8th January 2018

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Celebrities are given a smidgen of privacy at a difficult time in their lives shocker – Transparency Project

Posted January 8th, 2018 in civil procedure rules, family courts, media, news, privacy by sally

‘The Sun are very very cross. Why is that? Well…. Here’s the headline:

REDKNAPP DIVORCE SECRET
Jamie and Louise Redknapp’s divorce papers to be kept secret as a judge blocks the release of documents.’

Full Story

Transparency Project, 6th January 2018

Source: www.transparencyproject.org.uk

It’s a hard life for under pressure costs judges after proportionality ruling bites the dust – Litigation Futures

Posted January 8th, 2018 in civil procedure rules, costs, news, nuisance, proportionality by sally

‘A circuit judge has more than doubled the amount that Queen guitarist Brian May can recover after he settled a private nuisance dispute, ruling that the costs judge at first instance had misapplied the new proportionality test.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 8th January 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Costs judges reject claims for files by claimants wanting to challenge solicitors’ deductions – Litigation Futures

Posted January 8th, 2018 in civil procedure rules, compensation, costs, disclosure, documents, news by sally

‘The Senior Courts Costs Office has refused separate attempts to obtain copies of law firms’ client files by another firm that describes itself as the country’s “leading experts in fighting unfair compensation deductions”.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 8th January 2018

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Court of Appeal refuses to strike out restitutionary s.117 after-care claim – Local Government Lawyer

Posted December 19th, 2017 in appeals, civil procedure rules, judicial review, news, striking out by sally

‘A local authority and a clinical commissioning group have failed to convince the Court of Appeal that a restitutionary claim for payment of after-care services should be struck out as an abuse of process.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 18th December 2017

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Regional costs judge applies fixed costs to RTA claim that settled for £350k – Litigation Futures

Posted December 14th, 2017 in accidents, civil procedure rules, costs, news, road traffic by sally

‘A road traffic claim that settled pre-issue for £350,000 was subject to fixed recoverable costs (FRC) because it began in the portal, even though it was later removed because of its value, a regional costs judge has ruled.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 14th December 2017

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Evidence of children and vulnerable witnesses: Part 1 – Family Law

‘This article (the first of two) considers the evidence of any witness in family proceedings where that evidence diverges from the general procedural rules (as explained below) for evidence in family proceedings.’

Full Story

Family Law, 8th December 2017

Source: www.familylaw.co.uk

Can Insurance Provide Security for Costs? – Premier Motorauctions Ltd (In Liquidation) and Another v PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP & Another – Zenith PI Blog

Posted December 4th, 2017 in appeals, civil procedure rules, costs, insurance, news by sally

‘The Court of Appeal have considered the issue of whether or not an ATE policy is relevant when considering an application for security for costs.’

Full Story

Zenith PI Blog, 1st December 2017

Source: zenithpi.wordpress.com

Leading judge warns litigants not to start playing games over “minor procedural glitches” – Litigation Futures

Posted November 29th, 2017 in budgets, civil procedure rules, costs, delay, news, sanctions by sally

‘The incoming deputy head of civil justice has warned parties not to abuse the courts’ tougher approach to rule compliance.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 28th November 2017

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

English courts committed to high-quality commercial litigation throughout the country, says expert – OUT-LAW.com

‘Comments around the launch of the Business and Property Courts (BPC) underline the judicial service’s commitment to high-quality commercial litigation regardless of where a case is filed in England and Wales, an expert has said.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 23rd November 2017

Source: www.out-law.com

Expert Shopping Considered Again – by Fiona Ross – Park Square Barristers

Posted November 23rd, 2017 in civil procedure rules, expert witnesses, news, personal injuries by sally

‘An action was brought by a Claimant child for serious injuries she sustained in a road traffic accident. She recovered 90% of her claim in a liability trial however it was agreed between the parties that a preliminary issue should be tried as to whether her severe developmental abnormalities had been caused by the accident.’

Full Story

Park Square Barristers, 22nd November 2017

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

Pleadings & Fundamental Dishonesty – By Andrew Wilson – Park Square Barristers

Posted November 23rd, 2017 in civil procedure rules, costs, news, pleadings by sally

‘On 30th October 2017, the Court of Appeal finally settled whether fundamental dishonesty needs to pleaded before a Defendant can rely on CPR 44.16(1) to set aside QUOCS.’

Full Story

Park Square Barristers, 3rd November 2017

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

CPRC: no need yet for new privacy rule on costs in environmental cases – Litigation Futures

Posted November 23rd, 2017 in civil procedure rules, costs, environmental protection, news, privacy by sally

‘There is no immediate need for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) to introduce a new privacy rule for certain costs issues in environmental cases as it could conflict with its open justice review, it has decided.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 22nd November 2017

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Security for costs: ATE policies – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted November 22nd, 2017 in civil procedure rules, costs, insolvency, insurance, judgments, news by sally

‘In a commendable judgment dated 24 October 2016 in Premier Motorauctions v Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Snowden J injected a much needed dose of realism into an issue which had, for too long, suffered from a regrettable degree of uncertainty, namely security for costs applications against parties with after the event (ATE) insurance cover. Cases this year suggest that this is now a go-to authority for applications of this sort.’

Full Story

Hardwicke Chambers, 16th November 2017

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

New rule to emphasise that no Business & Property Courts case is “to big to be heard outside London” – Litigation Futures

Posted November 20th, 2017 in choice of forum, civil procedure rules, news, practice directions by tracey

‘There is to be a new part of the Civil Procedure Rules to deal with the launch of the Business and Property Courts (BPCs) to emphasise that no case is too big to be tried outside London, it has been decided.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 20th November 2017

Source: www.litigationfutures.com

Protected parties – CPR 21.10 compatible with ECHR ARTICLES 14 and 6 – defendant entitled to withdraw from compromise agreement – Zenith PI Blog

Posted November 14th, 2017 in agreements, civil procedure rules, compromise, human rights, news by tracey

‘Joseph James Penn Revill (a protected party proceedings by his litigation friend, Kirsty Marie Jarram) v Philip Damiani [2017] EWHC 2630 (QB). The claimant, who lacked the capacity to litigate and was acting by his litigation friend, sought damages for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident. His claim included a claim for future losses.’

Full Story

Zenith PI Blog, 13th November 2017

Source: zenithpi.wordpress.com

Appeal court orders proportionality test case revisit – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted November 8th, 2017 in appeals, civil procedure rules, costs, interpretation, judges, news, proportionality by tracey

‘The Court of Appeal has asked a costs judge to look again at the application of proportionality after ruling the new test was incorrectly applied. In the long-awaited appeal in BNM v MGN, master of the rolls Sir Terence Etherton held that senior costs judge Gordon-Saker had been wrong in principle to subject recoverable base cost and additional liabilities to the new proportionality rule.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 7th November 2017

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

An end to private hearing deals and unilateral emails to court: CPRC to strengthen open justice – Litigation Futures

Posted November 7th, 2017 in civil justice, civil procedure rules, consultations, news, private hearings by tracey

‘A default position that all court hearings should be conducted in public, and parties and witnesses named, is under consideration by the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) as part of a push to emphasise the importance of open justice, it has emerged.’

Full Story

Litigation Futures, 7th November 2017

Source: www.litigationfutures.com