Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2011 in insurance, law reports, local government, tenders by sally

Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council and another [2011] UKSC 7; [ 2011] WLR (D) 42

“A group of local authorities who awarded insurance contracts to a mutual insurance company they had set up for that purpose, without putting the contracts out to competitive tender, had not been acting contrary to the Public Contracts Regulations 2006.”

WLR Daily, 10th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 10th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

Brent London Borough Council and others v Risk Management Partners Ltd [2011] UKSC 7 (9 February 2011)

Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] UKSC 6 (9 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

SS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 76 (09 February 2011)

Immingham Storage Company Ltd v Clear Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 89 (09 February 2011)

Speed (A Minor) & Anor v London Borough of Waltham Forest & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 88 (09 February 2011)

Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107 (09 February 2011)

Acre 1127 Ltd (In Liquidation) v De Montfort Fine Art Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 87 (09 February 2011)

Challinor v Staffordshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 90 (09 February 2011)

Rubin v Coote [2011] EWCA Civ 106 (09 February 2011)

Jones v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 92 (08 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Legal Services Commission v Henthorn [2010] EWHC 3329 (QB) (04 February 2011)

Beach Developments Ltd v Foskett [2011] EWHC 198 (QB) (09 February 2011)

High Court (Commercial Court)

X v Y [2011] EWHC 152 (Comm) (09 February 2011)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Liberty Syndicate Management & Anor v Campagna Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 209 (TCC) (09 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

Brady v Norman – WLR Daily

Posted February 10th, 2011 in defamation, law reports, personal injuries, time limits by sally

Brady v Norman [2011] EWCA Civ 107; [2011] WLR (D) 40

“The policy behind the limitation period for defamation cases being shorter than that in personal injuries claims was clear, since the defamatory impact of libel or slander was likely to be transient and Parliament evidently intended that a claimant should assert and pursue his need for vindication speedily. Considerations as to prejudice in applications for the disapplication of the time limit in defamation cases were likely to be different than those in personal injuries cases and in defamation cases it was for the claimant to make out a case for the disapplication of the normal time limit.”

WLR Daily, 9th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Windsor and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 10th, 2011 in jurisdiction, law reports, proceeds of crime, receivers, restraining orders by sally

Regina v Windsor and others [2011] EWCA Crim 143; [2011] WLR (D) 41

“On an appeal against the making of restraint and receivership orders under Part 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 the Court of Appeal has power to suspend the effect of its final order.”

WLR Daily, 9th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 9th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Windsor & Ors v Crown Prosecution Service [2011] EWCA Crim 143 (08 February 2011)

Creed, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 144 (08 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79 (08 February 2011)

High Court (Patents Court)

Mölnlycke Health Care AB v Brightwake Ltd (t/a Advancis Medical) [2011] EWHC 140 (Pat) (26 January 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government – WLR Daily

Posted February 9th, 2011 in judicial review, law reports, planning, regional strategies by sally

R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39

“A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making determinations of applications for planning permission. The Secretary of State’s announced intention to abolish regional strategies did not compromise the duty of local planning authorities under section 19 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) to have regard to regional strategies when preparing a development plan or any other local development document.”

WLR Daily, 8th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Hydropool Hot Tubs Ltd v Roberjot and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 9th, 2011 in affidavits, civil procedure rules, contempt of court, law reports by sally

Hydropool Hot Tubs Ltd v Roberjot and another [2011] EWHC 121 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 38

“CPR r 32.14 had no application to an allegation of contempt by knowingly swearing a false affidavit.”

WLR Daily, 7th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 8th, 2011 in law reports by sally

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB) (07 February 2011)

Royal Bank of Scotland Invoice Discounting Ltd & Anor v Manuel [2011] EWHC 174 (QB) (04 February 2011)

McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 179 (QB) (07 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Clarke v Meadus [2011] EWHC 180 (Ch) (07 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin) (07 February 2011)

Morris, R (on the application of) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2011] EWHC 117 (Admin) (07 February 2011)

High Court (Family Division)

M v M [2011] EWHC 3574 (Fam) (19 October 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 7th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Shaw & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 98 (04 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) (04 February 2011)

Everton Football Club Company Ltd v Sail Group Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 126 (QB) (04 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Dias v London Borough of Havering [2011] EWHC 172 (Ch) (04 February 2011)

Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) (02 February 2011)

Curtis & Ors v Pulbrook & Ors [2011] EWHC 167 (Ch) (04 February 2011)

Strategic Value Master Fund Ltd v Ideal Standard Interntional Acquisition SARL & Ors [2011] EWHC 171 (Ch) (04 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

AE (Libya), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 154 (Admin) (2 February 2011)

Trillium (Prime) Property Gp Ltd v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 146 (Admin) (04 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

Glaves v Crown Prosecution Service – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2011 in certificates of inadequacy, confiscation, law reports by sally

Glaves v Crown Prosecution Service [2011] EWCA Civ 69; [2011] WLR (D) 37

“On an application by a defendant for a certificate of inadequacy in relation to a confiscation order under section 83 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 an investigation of the facts was required so that it was not appropriate to determine as a preliminary issue whether the application was bound to fail.”

WLR Daily, 4th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 7th, 2011 in costs, disciplinary procedures, law reports, solicitors, tribunals by sally

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another [2011] WLR (D) 36

“Where a solicitor admitted disciplinary charges, and therefore anticipated sanctions upon him, he should give notice in advance of the hearing to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that he intended to contend either that no order for costs should be made against him, in exercise of the tribunal’s power under section 47(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, or that any order for costs should be limited by reason of his lack of means.”

WLR Daily, 4th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 4th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Auton & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 76 (03 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Islam & Anor v Al- Sami & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 32 (03 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Wollenberg v Casinos Austria International Holding GmbH [2011] EWHC 103 (Ch) (03 February 2011)

Hobbs & Anor v Gibson & Ors [2010] EWHC 3676 (Ch) (17 December 2010)

Rosebery Ltd v Rocklee Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC B1 (Ch) (20 January 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain – WLR Daily

Posted February 4th, 2011 in EC law, extradition, law reports, time limits by sally

Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35

“Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement being sought and given for an extension of the period for extradition after the expiry of the original period, since it was only at the end of the original period that circumstances beyond the control of the member state or serious humanitarian reasons prevented extradition within that period and gave rise to the need for agreement on a new date for removal.”

WLR Daily, 3rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative Ltd and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 4th, 2011 in causation, consumer protection, law reports, unfair commercial practices by sally

Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 34

“For the purposes of applying the causation test in regulations 5 and 6 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 the combined effect of all relevant misleading acts and omissions had first to be ascertained, and then subjected to the test whether, taken in the aggregate, it would probably cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision which he would not otherwise have taken.”

WLR Daily, 3rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy – WLR Daily

Posted February 4th, 2011 in consumer credit, law reports by sally

HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy [2011] EWCA Civ 67; [2011] WLR (D) 33

“A clause in a credit card agreement which provided for the bank to determine the credit limit from time to time at its discretion by notifying the debtor of its amount was valid.”

WLR Daily, 3rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 3rd, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Llewellyn v Lorey & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 37 (03 February 2011)

Glaves v Crown Prosecution Service [2011] EWCA Civ 69 (03 February 2011)

Bowater v Northwest London Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 63 (03 February 2011)

Uren v Corporate Leisure (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 66 (02 February 2011)

HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy [2011] EWCA Civ 67 (02 February 2011)

Morgan v The Spirit Group Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 68 (02 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Forrest v Lord Chancellor & Anor [2011] EWHC 142 (Admin) (03 February 2011)

Patel v The Office of the Attorney General, Frankfurt [2011] EWHC 155 (Admin) (03 February 2011)

Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin) (02 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Ketteringham & Anor v Hardy [2011] EWHC 162 (Ch) (03 February 2011)

Marley v Rawlings & Anor [2011] EWHC 161 (Ch) (03 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench)

Ashia Centur Ltd v Barker Gillette LLP [2011] EWHC 148 (QB) (03 February 2011)

Trigger v Northampton Magistrates’ Court & Anor [2011] EWHC 149 (QB) (02 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – WLR Daily

Posted February 3rd, 2011 in asylum, children, deportation, human rights, immigration, law reports by sally
“The need to safeguard and promote the welfare of children who were in the United Kingdom was a primary consideration when immigration authorities were making a decision as to the deportation of a parent whose application for asylum in the United Kingdom had been refused. Once the children’s best interests had been identified, the authorities were then required to assess whether those interests were outweighed by any other considerations such as the need to maintain a proper and efficient system of immigration control. When the children had British citizenship that was of particular importance in assessing their best interests.”

WLR Daily, 2nd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Global Process Systems Inc and another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad – WLR Daily

Posted February 3rd, 2011 in insurance, law reports, shipping law by sally
“A provision in a marine cargo insurance policy excluding loss resulting from any inherent inability of the goods to withstand a voyage applied only where the goods had deteriorated, not because they had been subjected to some external fortuitous accident or casualty, but because of their natural behaviour in the ordinary course of the voyage.”
WLR Daily, 2nd February 2011
 
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Orr v Milton Keynes Council – WLR Daily

Posted February 3rd, 2011 in employment, law reports, unfair dismissal by sally
“The employer’s knowledge for the purposes of section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was that of the person who was deputed to carry out the employer’s functions.”
WLR Daily, 2nd February 2011
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina (Z) v Croydon London Borough Council – WLR Daily

Posted February 3rd, 2011 in asylum, children, judicial review, law reports by sally

Regina (Z) v Croydon London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 59; [2011] WLR (D) 29

“Where a court was considering whether to grant permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review of a local authority’s decision in an age assessment case the court should ask whether the material before it raised a factual case which, taken at its highest, could not properly succeed in a contested factual hearing. If so, permission should be refused. If not, permission should normally be granted, subject to other discretionary factors, such as delay. It was axiomatic that an unaccompanied asylum seeker who claimed to be a child should be given, where an assessment of his age was being conducted by a local authority, a fair and proper opportunity, at a stage when a possible adverse decision was no more than provisional, to deal with important points adverse to his age case which weighed against him.”

WLR Daily, 2nd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.