‘TW, SW, and EM, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Hillingdon (2018) EWHC 1791. This was a judicial review of Hillingdon’s allocation scheme and in particular, the thresholds for eligibility for inclusion on the housing list set by Hillingdon.’
Nearly Legal, 15th July 2018
Source: nearlylegal.co.uk
‘Kamara v London Borough Of Southwark (2018) EWCA Civ 1616. In Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council (2011) EWCA Civ 355 (our report), the Court of Appeal decided that the right to make ‘oral submissions’ in response to a ‘minded to’ letter under 8(2) of the 1999 Review Procedures Regulations meant a right to request ‘face to face’ advocacy in making representations. In these three joined appeals, the sole issue was whether this meant that the ‘minded to’ to letter had to specify the right to a face to face meeting for representations.’
Nearly Legal, 15th July 2018
Source: nearlylegal.co.uk
‘ Doing the right thing by disabled employees may require more than mere compliance with the minimum requirements set out in equalities law.’
OUT-LAW.com, 13th July 2018
Source: www.out-law.com
‘Stuart-Smith J’s judgment in Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust & Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Lancashire County Council provides helpful guidance on how not to conduct moderation meetings and highlights the defendant’s failure to provide adequate reasons for its decision making. What it does not provide is a finding on who deserved to win the contract.’
Practical Law: Construction Blog, 16th July 2018
‘The National Minimum Wage (NMW) does not apply to sleep-in shifts unless the worker is awake for the purpose of working, the Court of Appeal has reportedly ruled. It has been estimated that if Mencap, the appellant, had lost the case, it would have cost the care sector an estimated £400m in back-dated pay and £200m a year from 2020.’
Local Government Lawyer, 13th July 2018
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘Disabled people seeking employment or working in the legal profession are “an untapped resource”, according to ground-breaking research. It found a profession not set up to accommodate the needs of disabled people in or wanting to join the profession.’
Legal Futures, 16th July 2018
Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk
‘Outlines findings from a research study looking at the level of attrition in fraud and cyber crime cases reported to Action Fraud..’
Home Office, 16th July 2018
Source: www.gov.uk/home-office
‘The owner of a care home who tried to defraud residents out of £4.1million by isolating them from their families and persuading them to make him a beneficiary of their wills has been jailed today.’
Crown Prosecution Service, 13th July 2018
Source: www.cps.gov.uk
‘Too little, too late? As the CPS publishes its disclosure review, Narita Bahra and Fiona Robertson assess whether its assurances and safeguards can possibly achieve the pledged sea change.’
Counsel, July 2018
Source: www.counselmagazine.co.uk
‘Google fail? Heather Rogers QC puts the legal record straight on the first two ‘right to be forgotten’ cases – tried under the twilight data protection regime but with issues far from resolved.’
Counsel, July 2018
Source: www.counselmagazine.co.uk
‘A widower who is the sole carer of his four-year-old son has been forbidden to work and ordered to leave the country – even though the Home Office’s own lawyers advised them to drop the case.’
The Guardian, 16th July 2018
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Excessive court reporting restrictions, inadequate listing information and difficulties in obtaining documents are preventing scrutiny of economic crimes and bribery cases, according to a report by Corruption Watch UK.’
The Guardian, 16th July 2018
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘In the recent case of R (Hutchinson & Anor) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care & Anor the Administrative Court considered a challenge to the creation of a new model for the provision of health and social care in England.’
Community Care Blog, 10th July 2018
Source: communitycare11kbw.com
‘New UK trade mark laws have been finalised, although they will not take effect until early next year.’
OUT-LAW.co., 13th July 2018
Source: www.out-law.com
‘1 October 2019 will see a significant shake-up of the VAT rules in the construction sector. New rules will come into force on that date which will, in many cases, require the recipient of the supply of construction services, rather than the supplier, to account for VAT on the supply. Large and small businesses making standard-rated or reduced-rated supplies of construction services may be impacted. There may be cash flow implications, which could be positive or negative, for the businesses concerned.’
Practical Law: Construction Blog, 11th July 2018
The Nursing and Midwifery (Amendment) Order 2018
The European Union (Definition of Treaties) (Canada Trade Agreement) Order 2018
The Visiting Forces (Designation) Order 2018
The Financial Market Infrastructure Administration (England and Wales) Rules 2018
The Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (Commencement No. 1) (England and Wales) Order 2018
Source: www.legislation.gov.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Doherty v Fannigan Holdings Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1615 (12 July 2018)
Kamara v London Borough Of Southwark [2018] EWCA Civ 1616 (12 July 2018)
Secretary of State for the Home Department v MR (Pakistan) [2018] EWCA Civ 1598 (12 July 2018)
Thum v Thum [2018] EWCA Civ 624 (12 July 2018)
Personal Management Solutions Ltd & Anor v Brake Bros. Ltd & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 1635 (12 July 2018)
M (BIIa Article 19: Court First Seised) [2018] EWCA Civ 1637 (12 July 2018)
Broughal v Walsh Brothers Builders Ltd & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 1610 (10 July 2018)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Buchanan vThe Crown Prosecution Service [2018] EWHC 1773 (Admin) (10 July 2018)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Angel Group Ltd v Davey [2018] EWHC 1781 (Ch) (12 July 2018)
Signia Wealth Ltd v Vector Trustees Ltd [2018] EWHC 1774 (Ch) (11 July 2018)
Barker v Baxendale-Walker [2018] EWHC 1681 (Ch) (10 July 2018)
High Court (Commercial Court)
FM Capital Partners Ltd v Marino & Ors [2018] EWHC 1768 (Comm) (11 July 2018)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Sheffield City Council v Fairhall & Ors [2018] EWHC 1793 (QB) (12 July 2018)
Coghlan v Chief Constable of Manchester Greater Police & Ors [2018] EWHC 1784 (QB) (12 July 2018)
TPE v Franks [2018] EWHC 1765 (QB) (10 July 2018)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘The Chief Magistrate, Dame Emma Arbuthnot, has dismissed a prosecution of a driver using the Uber App, based on an allegation that the App was a form of plying for hire. Philip Kolvin QC of Cornerstone Barristers, who appeared for the defendant, Mudassar Ali, said the judicial decision was the first on the topic.’
Local Government Lawyer, 11th July 2018
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘There was no need for a judge who rejected permission to appeal on paper to recuse herself from the full hearing, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Lord Justice Patten said Her Honour Judge Baucher in Central London County Court had “done no more than indicate in her order” that the appeal would have no real prospect of success and there was “no other compelling reason” to grant permission.’
Litigation Futures, 12th July 2018
Source: www.litigationfutures.com
‘The Centre for Ethics & Laws at University College London is to hold an independent review into the regulatory framework for legal services. It will be led by Professor Stephen Mayson, a leading commentator on legal regulation.’
legal Futures, 12th July 2018
Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk
© Inner Temple Library 2025