Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd – WLR Daily

Posted March 2nd, 2009 in assignment, law reports, leases by sally

Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd; [2009] WLR (D) 72

Where the landlord’s consent was required to an assignment of a lease, the landlord could not reasonably impose a condition which was designed to increase the rights he enjoyed under the headlease.”

WLR Daily, 27th February 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

 

Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd – Times Law Reports

Posted March 2nd, 2009 in assignment, law reports, leases by sally

Landlord Protect Ltd v St Anselm Development Co Ltd

Court of Appeal

“Where the head landlord’s consent was required to an assignment of a lease, he could not reasonably impose a condition which was designed to increase the rights he enjoyed under the headlease.”

The Times, 2nd March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 from the date of publication.

Court ruling threatens ‘virtual assignments’ of property interests – OUT-LAW.com

Posted February 3rd, 2009 in assignment, leases, news by sally

“Companies which sign over the management of properties they rent without telling their landlord might be in breach of their leases after the High Court ruled in a landlord’s favour in a dispute.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 2nd February 2009

Source: www.out-law.com

Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc – WLR Daily

Posted January 27th, 2009 in assignment, covenants, law reports, leases by sally

Clarence House Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc [2009] EWHC 77 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 22

“By entering into a ‘virtual assignment’ of leasehold office premises, under which all the economic benefits and burdens of the relevant lease, including any management responsibilities, were transferred to a third party, but without any actual assignment of the leasehold interest or any change in the actual occupancy of the premises in question, the tenant acted in breach of the standard form alienation covenants contained in the lease.”

WLR Daily, 26th January 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Alchemy Estates Ltd v Astor and another – WLR Daily

Posted November 6th, 2008 in assignment, law reports, rescission, sale of goods by sally

Alchemy Estates Ltd v Astor and another [2008] EWHC 2675 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 343

“The contractual right of rescission under condition 8.3.3 of the Standard Conditions of Sale had to be exercised promptly, which meant by the contractual completion date, or possibly, within a day or two thereafter.”

WLR Daily, 6th November 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Scottish and Newcastle plc v Raguz – Times Law Reports

Posted November 3rd, 2008 in assignment, law reports, leases, rent, retrospectivity by sally

Scottish and Newcastle plc v Raguz

House of Lords

“Rent increases that would become retrospectively payable under uncompleted rent reviews had not been ‘now due’ within the meaning of section 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 and the landlords had not been required to serve protective notices on assignors under that section in respect of them.”

The Times, 3rd November 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Scottish & Newcastle plc v Raguz – WLR Daily

Posted October 31st, 2008 in assignment, law reports, leases, rent, retrospectivity by sally

Scottish & Newcastle plc v Raguz [2008] UKHL 65; [2008] WLR (D) 335

“Landlords were not required to serve notices under s 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 in respect of rent increases that would become retrospectively payable when rent reviews were completed. Such increases were ‘now due’ within the meaning of s 17.”

WLR Daily, 30th October 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Abbey National Treasury Services plc (Financial Services Authority intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted August 4th, 2008 in assignment, financial regulation, law reports, third parties by sally

Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Abbey National Treasury Services plc (Financial Services Authority intervening) [2008] EWHC 1897 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 277

“The Financial Services Authority had power under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to include rules in the financial services compensation scheme which provided for the assignment of third party claims.”

WLR Daily, 1st August 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners – Times Law Reports

Posted April 22nd, 2008 in assignment, law reports, VAT by sally

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners

Court of Appeal

“A taxable person was entitled to assign to another any benefit of repayment he enjoyed from the overpayment of value-added tax.”

The Times, 22nd April 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online fro 21 days from the date of publication.