In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford – WLR Daily

Posted August 22nd, 2007 in ecclesiastical law, faculties, law reports, telecommunications by sally

In re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford

“In carrying out the balancing exercise necessary in considering whether or not to grant a faculty for the installation of telecommunications equipment it was necessary to differentiate between the effect of the installation of equipment on children and the effect on adults. Mobile phone operators had to ensure a reasonable response to countering the risk to children from pornography over the mobile phone network. In respect of the risk to adults, to bar something which would be of benefit to the public generally because there was a risk that some adults would be able privately to access material which many Christians and others deplored was to take an unbalanced approach.”

WLR Daily, 21st August 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted August 21st, 2007 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Staffordshire County Council v Challinor & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 864 (17 August 2007)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Hamilton, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 2062 (16 August 2007)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AL [2007] EWHC 1970 (Admin) (17 August 2007)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (17 August 2007)

Source: www.bailii.org

Ellis v Bristol City Council – Times Law Reports

Posted August 21st, 2007 in codes of practice, health & safety, law reports by sally

Whether place of work unsafe

Ellis v Bristol City Council

Court of Appeal

“A judge should consider the Code of Practice issued by the Health and Safety Commission when deciding whether a place of work was unsafe.”

The Times, 21st August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Director of Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and Others (No 2) – Times Law Reports

Posted August 21st, 2007 in assets recovery, law reports, proceeds of crime by sally

Proving assets obtained by unlawful conduct

Director of Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and Others (No 2)

Court of Appeal

“On an application for an interim receiving order, the Director of the Assets Recovery Agency had to show that a criminal offence was committed and the property to be recovered was obtained by it or in return for it. It was not necessary to prove that a particular person committed a particular offence on a particular day.”

The Times, 21st August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina (Gulliver) v. Parole Board – Times Law Reports

Posted August 20th, 2007 in law reports, parole by sally

Parole Board responsibility

Regina (Gulliver) v. Parole Board

Court of Appeal

“When a prisoner who had been released on licence was recalled to prison, in deciding whether or not to order his release, the Parole Board was entitled to take into account all the circumstances, and was not confined to a review of the breach of the licence condition for which the Secretary of State for Justice had ordered his recall.”

The Times, 20th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Time Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Wolman v. Islington London Borough Council and Another – Times Law Reports

Posted August 20th, 2007 in law reports, parking by sally

Irrelevance of ‘on’ or ‘over’

Wolman v. Islington London Borough Council and Another

Court of Appeal

“It was an offence in Greater London to park a motorcycle on its stand on the pavement with its body and one or both of its wheels on or over the pavement.”

The Times, 20th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina (Southwark Law Centre) v. Legal Services Commission – Times Law Reports

Posted August 20th, 2007 in law reports, legal aid by sally

‘Net rent payable’ is not the same as rent paid

Regina (Southwark Law Centre) v Legal Services Commission; Regina (Dennis) v Same

Queen’s Bench Division

“Where a calculation of disposable income was being carried out for the purposes of assessing a person’s entitlement to publicly funded legal representation, the net rent payable by that person had to be taken into account rather than the net rent actually paid.”

The Times, 20th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

R v. Hamilton – WLR Daily

Posted August 20th, 2007 in law reports, outraging public decency by sally

R v. Hamilton [2007] EWCA Crim 2062

“The ‘two person rule’ applicable to the offence of outraging public decency contrary to common law was capable of being satisfied if there were two or more persons present who were capable of seeing the nature of the act even if they did not actually see it.”

WLR Daily, 16th August 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted August 15th, 2007 in law reports by sally

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

AB & Ors v British Coal Corporation (Rulings appended) [2007] EWHC 1948 (QB) (13 August 2007)

Ab & Ors v Small Mines – and – UK Coal [2007] EWHC 1939 (QB) (13 August 2007)

Source: www.bailii.org

Hawkes v. Cuddy and Others – Times Law Reports

Declaration of criminality made in civil proceedings

Hawkes v. Cuddy and Others

Chancery Division 

“The court had power, in appropriate circumstances, to grant a declaration of criminality in civil proceedings brought by a private individual litigant.”

The Times, 14th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina (Bennett) v. Inner South London Coroner, Officers A and B and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, interested parties – Times Law Reports

Posted August 13th, 2007 in coroners, juries, law reports by sally

Whether jury can be trusted

Regina (Bennett) v Inner South London Coroner, Officers A and B and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, interested parties

“While facts were for the jury, coroners were entitled to consider whether it was safe to leave a particular verdict on the evidence to the jury.”

The Times, 13th August 2007

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina v. P Ltd. and Another – Times Law Reports

Posted August 13th, 2007 in health & safety, law reports by sally

Ingredients of safety at work offence by officer

Regina v P Ltd and Another

“An offence was committed by an officer of a body corporate which broke health and safety laws through his behaviour if he either knew of the relevant facts giving rise to the offence, or if he did not know, should by reason of the circumstances, have been put on inquiry as to whether the relevant safety procedures were in place.”

The Times, 13th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Regina (Singh) v. Stratford Magistrates Court – Times Law Reports

Posted August 13th, 2007 in guardianship, judicial review, law reports, mental health by sally

No entitlement to trial

Regina (Singh) v Stratford Magistrates Court

“Where a hospital or guardianship order was made under section 37(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983, there was no entitlement to a trial under section 37(3). The Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Hughes and Mr Justice Treacy) so held on July 3, 2007, when dismissing a claim for judicial review by Surat Singh of the decision of a district judge to adjourn his trial for a second psychiatric report with a view to considering making either a hospital or guardianship order under section 37(1) without convicting him accused under section 37(3).”

The Times, 13th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Alzheimer’s: judgment in full – The Times

Posted August 10th, 2007 in law reports, medicines, mental health by sally

Eisai Ltd v NICE [2007] EWHC 1941 (Admin)

The Times, 10th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Jones v. Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) – Times Law Reports

Posted August 10th, 2007 in dividends, income tax, law reports, married persons, small businesses by sally

Husband not liable for tax on his wife’s private dividend

Jones v. Garnett (Inspector of Taxes)

House of Lords

“A spouse who used a private company to transfer some of his earned income to the other spouse was not liable to pay tax on that income, provided the other spouse’s shares in the company were ordinary shares which carried a right to more than mere income.”

The Times, 9th August 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Daily Telegraph Law Reports, 9th August 2007

Posted August 9th, 2007 in law reports by sally

R (Swami Suryananda) v. Welsh Ministers

R (Playfoot) v. Millais School Governing Body

North v. North

Software Cellular Network Ltd. v. T-Mobile (UK) Ltd.

R (JL) v. Home Secreatary

R v. Cemex Cement Ltd.

Daily Telegraph, 9th August 2007

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Director of Public Prosecutions v. Haw – WLR Daily

Posted August 8th, 2007 in demonstrations, law reports, police by sally

Director of Public Prosecutions v. Haw

“The statutory power available to the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis to impose conditions on authorisations for demonstrations in the vicinity of Parliament could be delegated.

WLR Daily, 6th August 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Hawkes v. Cuddy and others – WLR Daily

Hawkes v. Cuddy and others [2007] EWHC 1935 (Ch)

“The court had jurisdiction to grant a declaration on a petition brought under s 459 of the Companies Act 1985 where the unfair prejudice relied on was caused by the alleged contravention of s 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986 by a director of a company in liquidation who had become the director of another company that was known by a prohibited name.”

WLR Daily, 31st July 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

In re LM (Reporting restrictions: Coroner’s inquest) – WLR Daily

Posted August 8th, 2007 in inquests, law reports, reporting restrictions by sally

In re LM (Reporting restrictions: Coroner’s inquest) [2007] EWHC 1902 (Fam)

“The press would be permitted to report details of a surviving child’s parents and deceased siblings at an inquest into the death of one of the siblings.”

WLR Daily, 1st August 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Director of Assets Recovery Agency v. Szepietowski and others – WLR Daily

Posted August 8th, 2007 in assets recovery, law reports, proceeds of crime by sally

Director of Assets Recovery Agency v. Szepietowski and others

“On an application for an interim receiving order under s 246 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 the Director of the Assets Recovery Agency had to establish a good arguable case that the property to be recovered or other property it represented had been obtained by unlawful conduct. It was sufficient to show that a criminal offence had been committed and the property had been obtained by it or in return for it. It was not necessary to prove that a particular person committed a particular offence on a particular day.”

WLR Daily, 24th July 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.