BAILII: Recent Decisions
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Johnson (RT) v R [2009] EWCA Crim 468 (17 March 2009)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Johnson (RT) v R [2009] EWCA Crim 468 (17 March 2009)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Paulin v Paulin [2009] EWCA Civ 221 (17 March 2009)
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small [2009] EWCA Civ 220 (17 March 2009)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Revenue & Customs v The Boots Company Plc [2009] EWHC 487 (Ch) (16 March 2009)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Brett v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] EWHC 440 (Admin) (16 March 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
AM v Local Authority & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 205 (16 March 2009)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Harrison v Harrison [2009] EWHC 428 (QB) (06 February 2009)
Sports Network Ltd v Calzaghe [2009] EWHC 480 (QB) (16 March 2009)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97
“A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. That right extended to assets to which the convicted person had legal title but which were beneficially owned by someone else.”
WLR Daily, 16th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in once of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
“It would be unjust to activate a completed unpaid work requirement attached to a suspended order of imprisonment where an offender breached the suspended order by committing a further offence.”
The Times, 17th March 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
“Legislation criminalising sexual activity with a child did not make any distinction according to whether the victim was a girl or a boy and, in sentencing for such an offence, the court should not do so either.”
The Times, 17th March 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
High Court (Chancery Division)
Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch) (10 March 2009)
High Court (Queen’s Bench)
Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 406 (QB) (05 March 2009)
Al Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWHC 397 (QB) (05 March 2009)
Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 405 (QB) (13 February 2009)
High Court (Family Division)
K v K [2008] EWHC 2553 (Fam) (23 October 2008)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Bole & Anor v Huntsbuild Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 483 (TCC) (13 March 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Akhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions; [2009] WLR (D) 96
“University grounds and buildings were not an enclosed area within the meaning of s 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824.”
WLR Daily, 13th March
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Peters v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority and Another
Court of Appeal
“Damages awarded to a claimant severely disabled as a result of the defendants’ negligence were to be disregarded for the purpose of the charging provisions for the local authority providing her with statutory accommodation and care.”
The Times, 16th March 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
“A trial judge’s attitude towards defence counsel, which included sending her a note headed ‘6 P’s’ with a list of words in bold underneath saying ‘Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance’ contributed towards preventing a defendant receiving a fair trial.”
The Times, 16th March 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Cobham Hire Services Ltd v Eeles [2009] EWCA Civ 204 (13 March 2009)
Sinclair v Glatt [2009] EWCA Civ 176 (13 March 2009)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Williams, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 107 (27 February 2009)
Wayne, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 434 (09 March 2009)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Source: www.bailii.org
Youell v La Reunion Aerienne [2009] EWCA Civ 175; [2009] WLR (D) 95
“Where a court could otherwise determine the substance of a claim, the mere fact that the claim was the subject of an arbitration agreement did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. What was critical was the nature of the claim.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
“A judge had no power to alter the Civil Procedure Rules either by a judgment or practice direction or to vary or alter any practice direction which was binding on the court to which it was directed. Where there was a gap in the Rules or practice directions pending the giving of a practice direction, a judge had inherent jurisdiction to include procedural directions of general application in his judgment.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Proceedings brought by Gottfried Heinrich (Case C – 345/06) [2009] WLR (D) 93
“The annex to Commission Regulation (EC) 622/2003 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) 68/2004, had no binding force in so far as it sought to impose obligations on individuals because it had not been published in the Official Journal of the European Union.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court; [2009] WLR (D) 92
“In exercising its power under s 64(1) Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 to make ‘such order as to costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’ a magistrates’ court was entitled, when dismissing forfeiture proceedings, to take into account its view that the application had reasonably been made.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16; [2009] WLR (D) 91
“An offer by a squatter to buy the property from the owners in a letter marked ‘without prejudice’ could not be used as evidence that she had acknowledged the owners’ title to the property so as to defeat her claim to adverse possession.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreprots.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland; C and A v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; M v Same [2009] UKHL 15; [2009] WLR(D) 90
“The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (‘RIPA’) permitted covert surveillance of communications between lawyers and their clients covered by legal professional privilege and notwithstanding any statutory rights of persons in custody to consult privately with their lawyers.”
WLR Daily, 12th March 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
House of Lords
“Where an occupier disputing possession proceedings made an offer to the owners to buy the property in a ‘without prejudice’ letter, which was rejected, but later claimed that the title of the property had passed to her because of 12 years’ adverse possession, the owners could not rely on the letter as evidence that she had acknowledged their title to the property so as to defeat her claim.”
The Times, 13th March 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Prizedome Ltd & Anor v Revenue & Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 177 (12 March 2009)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Umbro International Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2009] EWHC 438 (Ch) (12 March 2009)
Hodson v Hodson & Ors [2009] EWHC 430 (Ch) (12 March 2009)
J, Re (Enduring Power of Attorney) [2009] EWHC 436 (Ch) (12 March 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Pullen, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 380 (20 February 2009)
Dixie, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 188 (03 February 2009)
Cahill, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 420 (26 February 2009)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Dean & Dean (A Firm) v Angel Airlines SA & Ors [2009] EWHC 447 (Ch) (11 March 2009)
Red River (UK) Ltd & Anor v Sheikh & Anor [2009] EWHC 431 (Ch) (09 March 2009)
High Court (Patents Court)
MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 418 (Pat) (11 March 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org