Daily Telegraph Law Reports, 22nd November 2007
AH (Sudan) & Others v Home Secretary
R (Harrington) v Bromley Magistrates’ Court
Daily Telegraph, 22nd November 2007
Source: www.telegraph.co.uk
Category: law reports
Ward v Police Service of Northern Ireland – Times Law Reports
Ward v Police Service of Northern Ireland
House of Lords
“The power to exclude a detainee and his legal representatives from an application under the Terrorism Act 2000 to extend the period of detention, included the power not to inform them of anything that took place during their exclusion.”
The Times, 22nd November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Hunte v E. Bottomley and Sons Ltd – Times Law Reports
Hunte v E. Bottomley and Sons Ltd
Court of Appeal
“Appellants should remember that if plans, maps or photos were to be relied upon they should be clearly marked and intelligible to the judges pre-reading the case.”
The Times, 21st November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Regina (Davey) v Aylesbury Vale District Council – Times Law Reports
Regina (Davey) v Aylesbury Vale District Council
Court of Appeal
“An order that a defendant was to recover its costs in judicial review proceedings which had proceeded to a full hearing, usually embraced all costs reasonably incurred by it before the grant of permission.”
The Times, 21st November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
In re DLP Ltd – WLR Daily
In re DLP Ltd [2007] EWHC 2669 (Pat)
“It was the intention of s 74B of the Patents Act 1977 and r 77K of the Patents Rules 1995 that an appeal should lie as of right where it related to part of an opinion issued by the Comptroller, pursuant to s 74A of the Patents Act 1977, which had not been set aside by a hearing officer on review.”
WLR Daily, 20th November 2007
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Regina (D) v Bromley London Borough Council and Another – Times Law Reports
Regina (D) v Bromley London Borough Council and Another
Court of Appeal
“It was contrary to natural justice for an education appeals panel to fail to provide an excluded pupil with the opportunity to comment on exceptional circumstances or other reasons which led the panel to refuse to direct his reinstatement at the school from which he had been permanently excluded.”
The Times, 20th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
In re LM (Reporting restrictions: Coroner’s inquest) – Times Law Reports
In re LM (Reporting restrictions: Coroner’s inquest)
Family Division
“Coroner’s inquests were court proceedings subject to the same principles and limitations governing other courts.”
The Times, 20th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
New Testament Church of God v Stewart – Times Law Reports
New Testament Church of God v Stewart
Court of Appeal
“An employment tribunal was not required to approach its consideration of the nature of the relationship between a minister and his church with the presumption that there was no intention to create legal relations.”
The Times, 20th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
BAILII: Recent Decisions
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Pattrick & Anor v Marley Estates Management [2007] EWCA Civ 1176 (15 November 2007)
George v R [2007] EWCA Crim 2722 (15 November 2007)
Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat Rev 1 [2007] EWCA Civ 1148 (15 November 2007)
Taylor Walton (a firm) v Laing [2007] EWCA Civ 1146 (15 November 2007)
Davey v Aylesbury Vale District Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1166 (15 November 2007)
El-Farargy v El Farargy & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1149 (15 November 2007)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Nadarajah v R [2007] EWCA Crim 2688 (16 November 2007)
George v R [2007] EWCA Crim 2722 (15 November 2007)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Mucelli v Albania & Anor [2007] EWHC 2632 (Admin) (15 November 2007)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Secretary of State for Trade & Industry v Vohora & Anor [2007] EWHC 2656 (Ch) (15 November 2007)
Ridgwell & Ors v Ridgwell & Ors [2007] EWHC 2666 (Ch) (14 November 2007)
Meretz Investments NV & Anor v ACP Ltd & Ors [2007] EWHC 2635 (Ch) (14 November 2007)
Wobben v Vestas-Celtic Wind Technology Ltd [2007] EWHC 2636 (Pat) (14 November 2007)
New ISG Ltd v Vernon & Ors [2007] EWHC 2665 (Ch) (14 November 2007)
Dadourian Group International Inc & Ors v Simms & Ors [2007] EWHC 2634 (Ch) (14 November 2007)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Grosvenor Casinos Ltd. v National Bank of Abu Dhabi [2007] EWHC 2600 (Comm) (14 November 2007)
High Court (Patents Court)
DLP Ltd, Re UK Intellectual Property Office Decision [2007] EWHC 2669 (Pat) (16 November 2007)
Source: www.bailii.org
Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council – Times Law Reports
Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council
Court of Appeal
“A shared residence order made by a family court in uncontested proceedings did not determine the question whether a parent in whose favour the order was made had a priority need for housing as a homeless person with dependent children who might reasonably be expected to reside with him.”
The Times, 19th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd – Times Law Reports
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd
Court of Appeal
“Where a claimant had made a mistake about the name but not the identity of the defendant, that name could be substituted after the expiry of the limitation period, where substitution was necessary required in order to determine the original action.”
The Times, 19th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
AH (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening) – WLR Daily
“In determining whether it would be unduly harsh to expect an asylum seeker to relocate to a safe haven in another part of his country, there was no requirement that the starting point of the assessment had to be consideration of conditions prevailing in the area from where the claimant had fled. It was for the decision maker to determine what weight was to be given to that, and all other relevant factors, in the context of the particular facts of the case.”
WLR Daily, 16th November 2007
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat (No 2) – WLR Daily
Sumukan Ltd v Commonwealth Secretariat (No 2) [2007] EWCA Civ 1148
“Where a contract contained a clause expressly providing for arbitration before a tribunal established according to the defendant’s rules, and one of the arbitrators was not validly appointed under those rules, the non-compliance rendered that arbitrator’s participation unlawful and the award a nullity. If the claimant could not with reasonable diligence have discovered the lack of validity within s 73 of the Arbitration Act 1996, the arbitrators lacked substantive jurisdiction under s 67 of the 1996 Act and the award would be set aside.”
WLR Daily, 16th November 2007
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Vohora and another – WLR Daily
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Vohora and another [2007] EWHC 2656 (Ch)
“A claim by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to disqualify a director of a company, on the ground that it was expedient in the public interest, had to be brought, rather that started, within two years. Therefore the two-year period was a limitation provision and, in accordance with CPR Pt 7, para 5, where the Secretary of State’s claim form was received in the court office on a date earlier than the date on which it was issued, the claim was “brought” for the purposes of the two-year period on that earlier date.”
WLR Daily, 16th November 2007
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Regina v Brown (Kirsty) – Times Law Reports
Courts-Martial Appeal Court
“There was no principle by which a serviceman absent without leave ceased to be under an obligation to obey a lawful order.”
The Times, 16th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication
Regina (Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health and Another – Times Law Reports
Regina (Wright and Others) v. Secretary of State for Health and Another
Court of Appeal
“Those who worked with vulnerable adults should be given the opportunity to make representations before being placed on a list preventing them doing such work.”
The Times, 16th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication
R (O’Connell) v Parole Board and another – WLR Daily
R (O’Connell) v Parole Board and another [2007] EWHC 2591 (Admin)
“A decision by the Parole Board as to whether to direct the release on licence of a prisoner serving an extended sentence under s 227 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 who had not yet finished the custodial part of the imposed term, engaged the right not to be arbitrarily detained under art 5(4) of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, art 5(4) did not require an oral hearing in every case where the question was the assessment of risk to the public, and whether or not an oral hearing was necessary would depend upon the facts.”
WLR Daily, 13th November 2007
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
AH and Others (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – Times Law Reports
AH and Others (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
House of Lords
“In determining whether it would be unduly harsh to expect an asylum seeker to relocate to a safe haven in another part of his country, there was no requirement that consideration of conditions in the place of habitual residence had to be the starting point of the assessment. It was for the decision-maker to determine what weight was to be given to that, and all other relevant factors, in the context of the particular facts of the case.”
The Times, 15th November 2007
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
