House of Lords Judgments: What’s New?
Source: www.parliament.uk
Elgafaji and another v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (Case C-465/07); [2009] WLR (D) 59
“For a person to be eligible for subsidiary protection status on the ground that there was a serious and individual threat to his life, it was not essential for him to prove that he was specifically targeted, but it could exceptionally be sufficient for such a threat to be established by a high level of indiscriminate violence in the country in question.”
WLR Daily, 17th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
“A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a claim for judicial review of a decision of the Secretary State to approve an expression of interest by a sponsor of an academy under s 482 of the Education Act 1996 (as substituted by s 65(1) of the Education Act 2002). The protection conferred by the procurement regime created by the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/5) could only be invoked in private law proceedings by affected economic operators.”
WLR Daily, 17th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
“Although the interests and liabilities of a member of a limited liability partnership were different from those of a contributory to a limited company and those differences might lead to some changes in practice so far as petitions to wind them up were concerned, a person seeking to exercise a right to appear and be heard in court proceedings, whether as creditor or contributory, should at least claim to be a member of the class on whom that right was conferred.”
WLR Daily, 17th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Ugiagbe v Southwark London Borough Council
Court of Appeal
“Failure to follow informal advice to go to a local housing authority’s homeless persons unit when threatened with eviction, did not make an applicant intentionally homeless.”
The Times, 18th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Crown Prosecution Service Swansea v Gilleeney & Anor [2009] EWCA Crim 193 (17 February 2009)
Meenan, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 140 (21 January 2009)
Berr, R (on the prosecution of) v Lowe [2009] EWCA Crim 194 (17 February 2009)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Financial Services Authority v Hayes [2009] EWCA Civ 76 (17 February 2009)
High Court (Administrative Court)
L v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] EWHC 238 (Admin) (14 January 2009)
Writtle v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] EWHC 236 (Admin) (20 January 2009)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Seele Austria GmbH Co v Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd [2009] EWHC 255 (TCC) (17 February 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 66 (16 February 2009)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Haji-Ioannou v Mark Dixon Regus Group Plc & Anor [2009] EWHC 178 (QB) (06 February 2009)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Moduleco v Carillion [2009] EWHC 250 (TCC) (11 February 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Imageview Management Ltd v Jack [2009] EWCA Civ 63; [2009] WLR (D) 56
“An agent when negotiating with another person on behalf of his principal breached the fiduciary duty which he owed to his principal if at the same time he made with the other person an undisclosed side deal for his own benefit and there were a real possibility of conflict of interest. In such a case the agent was required to account to the principal in respect of the secret commission so received and was not entitled to receive any agency fees from the principal.”
WLR Daily, 17th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
“Ss 5(4) and 9(2) of the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008 and art 6 of the Northern Rock plc Compensation Order 2008 (SI 2008/718), the provisions establishing the assumptions upon which valuation of shares was carried out under a scheme for compensating shareholders subsequent to the nationalisation of Northern Rock plc, did not infringe the shareholders right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions under art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundmamental Freedoms (set out in Pt II of Sch 1 to the Human Rights Act 1998).”
WLR Daily, 16th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wright Regina (Scott) v Taunton Deane Magistrates Court
Queen’s Bench Divisional Court
“The expression ‘hunt’ a wild mammal with a dog in section 1 of the Hunting Act 2004 did not include the activity of searching for a wild animal for the purpose of stalking or flushing it.”
The Times, 17th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Barry v Southwark London Borough Council
Court of Appeal
“When determining whether a person claiming housing assistance had been unemployed for no more than six months and was a worker, a housing authority was entitled to look at his employment record in order to tell whether the work was effective and genuine, and not marginal and ancillary.”
The Times, 17th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
High Court (Chancery Division)
Managa Properties Ltd v Brittain [2009] EWHC 157 (Ch) (06 February 2009)
Hammonds (A Firm) v Danilunas & Ors [2009] EWHC 216 (Ch) (13 February 2009)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Hampshire Police Authority v Smith [2009] EWHC 174 (Admin) (12 February 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org
Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia – Linee Aeree Italiane SpA Case C-549/07
Court of Justice of the European Communities
“A technical problem in an aircraft which led to the cancellation of a flight did not constitute a sufficiently extraordinary circumstance to justify the carrier refusing to pay compensation to passengers unless the problem stemmed from events which, by their nature or origin, were not inherent in the normal exercise of the carrier’s activity and were beyond its actual control.”
The Times, 16th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Campbell & Ors, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 50 (02 February 2009)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Source: www.bailli.org
British Broadcasting Corporation v Sugar and another [2009] UKHL 9; [2009] WLR (D) 51
“The BBC was a public authority for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 so that a request for information which the BBC claimed was held for the purposes of journalism, and was therefore excluded from the requirements of disclosure, was subject to the jurisdiction of the Information Commissioner and, on appeal, the Information Tribunal, even if the information requested was held for the purposes of art, journalism or literature.”
WLR Daily, 12th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat); [2009] WLR (D) 50
“Compensation of employees for certain inventions pursuant to s 40 of the Patents Act 1977 was not restricted to remedying some loss. Compensation for an invention of ‘outstanding benefit’ was to be determined in accordance with all available evidence, as per s 41 of the 1977 Act, so as to secure a just and fair reward to the employee, neither limiting the employee to compensation for loss or damage, nor placing the employee in as strong a position as an external patentee or licensor.”
WLR Daily, 12th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
In re Overnight Ltd; Goldfarb v Higgins and others; [2009] WLR (D) 49
“The cause of action for fraudulent trading under s 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 arose on the day the winding up order was made and not when either the petition was presented or the provisional liquidator appointed.”
WLR Daily, 12th February 2009
Source: www.lawreports.co.uk
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.
Regina (Liverpool City Council) v Hillingdon London Borough Council and Another
Court of Appeal
“A local authority had failed to carry out its duty under section 20 of the Children Act 1989 when dealing with an asylum-seeker who claimed to be a child because it did not carry out an assessment of his welfare needs, or of the kind of accommodation that would be required to meet them.”
The Times, 13th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Allianz SpA and Another v West Tankers Inc
Court of Justice of the European Communities
“It was not open to a court in one European Union member state to order a party in a case before it to discontinue proceedings begun by that party in another member state on the ground that the parties had agreed to refer any disputes between them to arbitration in the first state.”
The Times, 13th February 2009
Source: www.timesonline.co.uk
Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Roberts v Chief Constable of Kent [2008] EWCA Civ 1588 (17 December 2008)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Greene Wood & McLean Llp v Templeton Insurance Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 65 (12 February 2009)
Bedfordshire Police Authority v Constable [2009] EWCA Civ 64 (12 February 2009)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Secretary of State for the Home Department v GG [2009] EWHC 142 (Admin) (12 February 2009)
Kagabo v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 153 (Admin) (12 February 2009)
High Court (Patents Court)
Kelly & Anor v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) (11 February 2009)
Source: www.bailii.org.uk