Kirpans and callous killing – is Aristotle to blame? – Law & Religion UK
‘Why did the judge in The King v Vickrum Singh Digwa (1/6/26) describe the assailant, Digwa, as “carrying a large Sikh dagger” in “a sheath attached to a belt over the outside,” which would go onto brutally kill young Henry Nowak? Why did he say “[i]t is a strict requirement of the Sikh faith to have a knife, called a kirpan, at all times” and that “[g]enerally, this will be a small knife, hidden from view, often on a length of cord and worn around the neck.” If it is a “kirpan” why not call it that? And does it matter that it was called a “knife” first and a “kirpan” only later? Is the Sikh “kirpan” a knife?’
Law & Religion UK, 17th June 2026
Source: lawandreligionuk.com

