Recent Statutory Instruments – legislation.gov.uk

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in legislation by sally

The Legal Services Act 2007 (Commencement No. 8, Transitory and Transitional Provisions) Order 2010

The Legal Services Act 2007 (Legal Complaints) (Parties) Order 2010

Source: www.legislation.gov.uk

Regina v Hamer – WLR Daily

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in appeals, bad character, evidence, law reports, penalties by sally

Regina v Hamer [2010] WLR (D) 235

“A fixed penalty notice which had been issued to a defendant pursuant to s 2 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 was not a conviction, admission of guilt, proof that a crime had been committed, or a stain on the defendant’s character, and therefore could not be regarded as evidence which impugned the character of the defendant or admitted as such.”

WLR Daily, 20th August 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Seaton – WLR Daily

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in appeals, evidence, law reports, murder, privilege by sally

Regina v Seaton [2010] EWCA Crim 1980; [2010] WLR (D) 234

“Where it was suggested at trial that a defendant’s or witness’s account was a recent fabrication, he could not, unless he had waived legal professional privilege, be asked whether he had told his lawyer what he now said was the truth, or whether he was willing to waive the privilege. If a defendant gave evidence of what had passed between him and his lawyer, he could not be in breach of his own privilege, but was waiving privilege, although not necessarily waiving it entirely and generally. If a defendant said that he had given his solicitor the account then offered at trial, that would ordinarily mean that he could not be cross-examined about exactly what he had told the solicitor on that topic, but another party could comment upon the fact that the solicitor had not been called to confirm something which, if true, he easily could confirm, if the comment were fair.”

WLR Daily, 20th August 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

New evidence may clear postman of sex attack after 14 years in jail – The Guardian

“Lawyer for Victor Nealon says crucial forensic evidence was left untested as surgeon insists wrong man was convicted.”

Full story

The Guardian, 22nd August 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Woman who urinated on war memorial flees court – The Guardian

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in news, outraging public decency by sally

“A woman has fled court before being sentenced for urinating and committing a sex act on a war memorial – the fourth case of its kind in Britain within a year.”

Full story

The Guardian, 20th August 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Sentences of ‘happy-slap’ killers ‘not unduly lenient’ – BBC News

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in attorney general, homicide, news, sentencing by sally

“The sentences of two members of a ‘happy-slapping’ gang who killed a grandfather in south London were not unduly lenient, the attorney general has ruled.”

Full story

BBC News, 20th August 2010

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Ex-boss jailed for stealing £250,000 from charity – The Independent

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in charities, fraud, money laundering, news, sentencing, theft by sally

“A former senior official at a charity founded by the Prince of Wales was jailed for three years today after he admitted stealing £250,000.”

Full story

The Independent,

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Press superinjunctions show privacy can be had for a price – The Guardian

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in injunctions, media, news by sally

“Will politicians be able to reform privacy law without private emotions clouding their judgment?”

Full story

The Guardian, 22nd August 2010

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Parents win legal battle to name doctor who accused them of child abuse – Daily Telegraph

Posted August 23rd, 2010 in child abuse, doctors, expert witnesses, news by sally

“A couple cleared of injuring their baby son have won a legal battle to identify the doctor who gave evidence against them.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 22nd August 2010

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk