BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 28th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt Des Offentlichen Rechts v JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 390 (28 April 2010)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Floyd & Anor v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 906 (QB) (28 April 2010)

Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd. [2010] EWHC 924 (QB) (28 April 2010)

Campbell v PCHA [2010] EWHC 859 (QB) (15 April 2010)

Eastlands Homes Partnership Ltd v Whyte [2010] EWHC 695 (QB) (31 March 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Singla v Hedman & Ors [2010] EWHC 902 (Ch) (28 April 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Kodos (aka Jetmir Olltari) v Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2010] EWHC 897 (Admin) (28 April 2010)

Jones v HM Coroner for the Southern District of Greater London & Anor [2010] EWHC 931 (Admin) (28 April 2010)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Zodiac Maritime Agencies Ltd v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 903 (Comm) (28 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Regina v Upper Bay Ltd – Times Law Reports

Posted April 28th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Regina v Upper Bay Ltd

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“A parent’s duty to supervise his child and an employer’s duty to conduct its undertaking so that users were not exposed to health or safety risks were concurrent duties so that if the child suffered harm the breach of parental duty did not absolve an employer from responsibility.”

The Times, 28th April 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Irish Reel Productions Ltd v Capitol Films Ltd – Times Law Reports

Posted April 28th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Irish Reel Productions Ltd v Capitol Films Ltd

Chancery Division

“The court had jurisdiction to order that the costs of winding-up proceedings were payable by administrators.”

The Times, 28th April 2010

Source:www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina v Richards – Times Law Reports

Posted April 28th, 2010 in law reports, non-molestation orders by sally

Regina v Richards

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“In respect of a charge of breach of a non-molestation order, the burden of proof was on the prosecution to show that the defendant, in acting as he did, acted without reasonable excuse.”

The Times, 28th April 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 27th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

AY, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 762 (27 April 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 453 (27 April 2010)

Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2010] EWCA Civ 419 (27 April 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Oxfordshire County Council, R (on the application of) v The Bus Lane Adjudicator [2010] EWHC 894 (Admin) (26 April 2010)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Croft House Care Ltd & Ors v Durham County Council [2010] EWHC 909 (TCC) (27 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 27th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Hughes v Borodex Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 425 (27 April 2010)

Campbell & Anor v William Banks & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 452 (26 April 2010)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

University of London v Tariquez Zaman [2010] EWHC 908 (QB) (27 April 2010)

Bowman v MGN Ltd [2010] EWHC 895 (QB) (26 April 2010)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Pilon Ltd v Breyer Group Plc [2010] EWHC 837 (TCC) (23 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Football Dataco Ltd and others v Brittens Pools Ltd; Same v Yahoo! UK Ltd; Same v Stan James (Abingdon ) Ltd and others – WLR Daily

Posted April 27th, 2010 in copyright, database right, EC law, law reports, sport by sally

Football Dataco Ltd and others v Brittens Pools Ltd; Same v Yahoo! UK Ltd; Same v Stan James (Abingdon ) Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 841 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 104

“The selection or arrangement required by art 3(1) of the European Parliament and Council Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases was not confined to selection or arrangement performed after the data in a database was finally created.”

WLR Daily, 26th April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Link Lending Ltd v Hussain and another – WLR Daily

Posted April 27th, 2010 in appeals, land registration, law reports, loans, mental health, repossession by sally

Link Lending Ltd v Hussain and another [2010] EWCA Civ 424; [2010] WLR (D) 103

“A person, who had been taken into psychiatric care under s3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and had been involuntarily placed elsewhere, was still in actual occupation of her own home under the land registration legislation. Where therefore the owner, lacking legal capacity, had transferred the property to a swindler for no consideration and the swindler had secured a loan on the property from a lender which he had failed to repay, the lender as the registered chargee was not entitled to dispossess her on the ground that she was not in actual occupation of her home.”

WLR Daily, 26th April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported on one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina (Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others – WLR Daily

Regina (Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2010] EWHC 852(Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 102

“The duty of fairness which arose in respect of an Ofsted inspection carried out pursuant to s 20 of the Children Act 2004 was derived from a duty to carry out a bona fide and open-minded inspection into the operation of local authority departments and systems of safeguarding and not to inspect individuals. When making directions pursuant to s 497A of the Education Act 1996 (as inserted by s 8 of the School Standard and Framework Act 1998) to remove an office holder, the Secretary of State could, in certain circumstances, put the wider interests of child safeguarding above the interest of an individual office holder to be treated fairly. That should not mean that the individual concerned should be deprived of her reputation or other contractual or statutory rights. An individual removed from office pursuant to s 497A who had standing to bring a claim against the employer authority in the employment tribunal should bring that claim first and pursue a claim for judical review against her employer only as a last resort.”

WLR Daily, 26th April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Winterflood Securities Ltd and others v Financial Services Authority – WLR Daily

Posted April 27th, 2010 in appeals, financial regulation, law reports by sally

Winterflood Securities Ltd and others v Financial Services Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 423; [2010] WLR (D) 101

“The definition of market abuse in s 118 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 did not require the person engaging in the behaviour in question to have intended to abuse the market and accordingly it was not essential for such an intention or purposes to be present for behaviour to fall below the objective standards expected. Moreover, the regulatory regime introduced by the Act and its Code of Conduct did not offend against the principle of legal certainty, once it was appreciated that the provisions of the Code, other than those falling within s 122(1) of the Act, were intended to have no more than evidential effect.”

WLR Daily, 26th April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 26th, 2010 in law reports by sally

High Court (Chancery Division)

Pillar Securitisation SARL & Ors v Spicer & Anor (Court Administrators) [2010] EWHC 836 (Ch) (01 April 2010)

Dennard & Ors v Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp [2010] EWHC 812 (Ch) (23 April 2010)

Sel-Imperial Ltd v The British Standards Institution [2010] EWHC 854 (Ch) (23 April 2010)

Digicel (St. Lucia) Ltd & Ors v Cable & Wireless Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 888 (Ch) (23 April 2010)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Michael Phillips Architects Ltd v Riklin & Anor [2010] EWHC 834 (TCC) (23 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Khatri v Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA – WLR Daily

Posted April 26th, 2010 in appeals, contracts, law reports, summary judgments by sally

Khatri v Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA [2010] EWCA Civ 397; [2010] WLR (D) 100

“Where an application for summary judgment turned on the terms of a written contract, it did not follow that the factual matrix of the contractual relationship could only be determined by a full trial with discovery, evidence and cross-examination of witnesses. If there was no conflict of evidence on a relevant point of background matrix, it was only when there really were reasonable grounds for supposing that a fuller investigation of the facts as to the background might make a difference to construction that the court should decline to construe the contract on a summary judgment (including a strike out) application.”

WLR Daily, 23rd April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R v Modjiri – WLR Daily

Posted April 26th, 2010 in appeals, confiscation, housing, law reports, proceeds of crime by sally

R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829; [2010] WLR (D) 99

“The concern of s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is limited to the valuation of property and does not extend to the realisation of property, so that it does not have to be assumed that a beneficial interest in property has to be sold separately from the property and, for the purposes of making a confiscation order, the correct basis on which to proceed is to take into account the due proportion of the proceeds which the defendant would receive on sale of the property.”

WLR Daily, 23rd April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 23rd, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Modjiri, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 829 (22 April 2010)

Taylor & Ors v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 830 (22 April 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

MccArtney & Ors v Unite The Union & Anor [2010] EWHC 826 (Ch) (22 April 2010)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

TUV v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB) (22 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

British Chiropractic Association v Singh – Times Law Reports

Posted April 23rd, 2010 in law reports by sally

British Chiropractic Association v Singh

Court of Appeal

“A statement, made by a scientific journalist in a newspaper article, that there was ‘not a jot of evidence’ to support claims made by the British Chiropractic Association of certain medical benefits resulting from its members’ treatment of patients, was not an assertion of fact but a statement of opinion.”

The Times, 23rd April 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 22nd, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Poulton v Ministry of Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 392 (22 April 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Leeds Group Plc v Leeds City Council [2010] EWHC 810 (Ch) (21 April 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Crown Court Sitting At Croydon [2010] EWHC 805 (Admin) (24 March 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same – WLR Daily

R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98

“The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases.”

WLR Daily, 21st April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 21st, 2010 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

F & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 (21 April 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Lui v Chong [2010] EWCA Civ 398 (21 April 2010)

Williams v Lishman, Sidwell, Campbell & Price Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 418 (21 April 2010)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Phoenix Partners Group Llp v Asoyag [2010] EWHC 846 (QB) (21 April 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Prosser, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 845 (Admin) (21 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted April 21st, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

NT, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 711 (31 March 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Vodafone Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc Office of Communications [2010] EWCA Civ 391 (20 April 2010)

Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd. & Ors v Fattal & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 408 (20 April 2010)

Milner & Anor v Carnival Plc (t/a Cunard) [2010] EWCA Civ 389 (20 April 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Aspect Capital Ltd v Christensen [2010] EWHC 744 (Ch) (29 March 2010)

Amin & Anor v Amin & Ors [2010] EWHC 827 (Ch) (20 April 2010)

Paddington Basin Developments Ltd. & Ors v West End Quay Estate Management Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 833 (Ch) (20 April 2010)

High Court (Commercial Court)

The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd v HSBC Insurance (UK) Ltd [2010] EWHC 773 (Comm) (19 April 2010)

High Court (Patents Court)

HTC Corporation v Yozmot 33 Ltd. [2010] EWHC 786 (Pat) (20 April 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Sun Life Assurance of Canada (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners – WLR Daily

Posted April 20th, 2010 in appeals, corporation tax, insurance, law reports by sally

Sun Life Assurance of Canada (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWCA Civ 394; [2010] WLR (D) 97

“In calculating the liability to corporation tax of an insurer in respect of its basic life and general annuity business, the taxpayer was entitled to relief in respect of losses incurred in past years, including years prior to 2003, when the law had been amended to make specific reference to the right to carry losses forward in respect of that type of business.”

WLR Daily, 16th April 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.