JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov – WLR Daily

Posted November 9th, 2012 in committals, contempt of court, disclosure, human rights, jurisdiction, law reports by tracey

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov: [2012] EWCA Civ 1411;   [2012] WLR (D)  308

“The court had jurisdiction to make an order barring a defendant, who had absconded following his committal for contempt, from defending the claims against him unless within a stated period he both surrendered to custody and made proper disclosure of all his assets and dealings with them.”

WLR Daily, 6th November 2012

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

More committal hearings abolished – Ministry of Justice

Posted November 6th, 2012 in committals, courts, news by sally

“Criminals will face justice far more quickly as court committal hearings are abolished in dozens of areas of England and Wales from today [5 November].”

Full story

Ministry of Justice, 5th November 2012

Source: www.justice.gov.uk

Law Society v McPhail – WLR Daily

Posted February 15th, 2011 in committals, contempt of court, law reports, Law Society by sally

Law Society v McPhail [2011] WLR (D) 45

“In the interests of fairness, a person charged with contempt of court whose liberty was therefore at stake should be able to appear at a hearing to answer points raised by his accusers.”

WLR Daily, 14th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v Okonkwo – WLR Daily

Posted October 14th, 2010 in civil procedure rules, committals, law reports by sally

Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v Okonkwo [2010] EWCA Civ 1113; [2010] WLR (D) 251

“If, following an application by a creditor for an order to gain information from a judgment debtor, the debtor failed to attend court the judge should not use a committal order, even when suspended, as little more than a vehicle for fixing a date for an effective adjourned hearing. A judge had a discretion whether to make such an order and should exercise it, and be seen to exercise it, with due regard to its seriousness.”

WLR Daily, 13th October 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

In re B (Minors) (Contact order: Enforcement) – Times Law Reports

Posted March 19th, 2009 in committals, contact orders, contempt of court, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

In re B (Minors) (Contact order: Enforcement)

Court of Appeal

“Where a local authority was in breach of a contact order, it was enforceable by committal for contempt of court.”

The Times, 19th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement) – WLR Daily

Posted March 3rd, 2009 in committals, contact orders, contempt of court, jurisdiction, law reports by sally

In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73

A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant child was.”

WLR Daily, 2nd March 2009

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

 

 

Hammerton v. Hammerton – Times Law Reports

Posted April 12th, 2007 in committals, contact orders, law reports by sally

Committal hearing should be separate from contact case

Hammerton v. Hammerton

Court of Appeal 

“It was not appropriate to hear contact proceedings at the same time as committal proceedings.”

The Times, 12th April 2007

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Hickling v. Baker – WLR Daily

Posted April 12th, 2007 in committals, insolvency, law reports by sally

Hickling v. Baker [2007] EWCA Civ 287

“An application for a committal order under s 364 of the Insolvency Act 1986 where an undischarged bankrupt failed to co-operate with the trustee in bankruptcy should normally be made on notice, unless a statutory provision provided otherwise. Any other exception to that practice had to be justified by evidence. Further, any committal order made without notice should require that, once arrested, the person in question should be brought promptly before the court for a hearing in order to comply with art 5 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.”

WLR Daily, 4th April 2007

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.