‘Barristers Jim Duffy, Shaheen Rahman KC and Jasper Gold discuss the latest happenings in the related worlds of inquests and inquiries, as well as looking at possible changes to Scotland’s fatal accident inquiries system. The ‘Hillsborough law’, causation in the context of criminal procedure, and human rights in private care homes also feature.’
Law Pod UK, 20th October 2026
Source: audioboom.com
‘What is an asset of community value (ACV) and what is it for? ACVs were created under part 5 (Community empowerment) of the Localism Act 2011. By the act, specified local authorities must maintain a list of nominated ACVs furthering the social wellbeing or interests of the local community, following nominations from parish councils or local community groups.’
Law Society's Gazette, 16th October 2026
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
‘A legal challenge mounted by more than 13,000 black cab drivers against ride-share company Uber has been rejected by the High Court after it was ruled to have been submitted too late.’
The Independent, 19th October 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘Killers and serious sex offenders detained in hospital are among the criminals who will no longer receive benefits under proposals called for by victims’ families.’
BBC News, 20th October 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘Joshua [Dubin] discusses a recent case where he acted for a homeowner when the possession of a grass verge between two properties on an open-aspect estate was called into question.’
3 Paper Buildings, 14th October 2026
Source: www.3pb.co.uk
‘Emma McIlveen analyses the 2025-2026 decisions that have turned the Higgs framework into a working machine, with results less predictable than either side of the debate would like.’
3 Paper Buildings, 8th October 2026
Source: www.3pb.co.uk
‘A ‘despicable and depraved’ stalker has been jailed after he sent his victim AI photos of her naked and a bag of his own semen.’
The Independent, 19th October 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘This case involves a successful in an appeal before the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) concerning Ms Kuzelova’s entitlement to Housing Benefit. Upper Tribunal Judge Gullick KC found that relevant provisions of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 (“the HB Regulations”) were unlawfully discriminatory.’
Nearly Legal, 17th October 2026
Source: nearlylegal.co.uk
‘Sarah Bowen considers the Guidance issued by the EAT on the use of AI by litigants in person (LiPs) and its implications for LiPs and employment practitioners.’
3 Paper Buildings, 8th October 2026
Source: www.3pb.co.uk
‘We’re pleased to be publishing The Insolvency Act: 40 Years On, a new five-part article series from 3 Hare Court for the ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE community. … First up, Nicholas Leah explores “Traps for the Unwary: Common Pitfalls in Insolvency Litigation”, looking at some of the procedural and practical hazards frequently encountered in insolvency disputes.’
3 Hare Court, 5th October 2026
Source: thoughtleaders4.com
‘Linda O’Brien died on 9 May 2020 having fallen from the window of her flat. Alan McMahon, her former partner, was inside at the time. A five-year restraining order prohibited him from contacting her or entering her building. A month earlier, on 7 April 2020, four Merseyside Police officers attended the flat after a neighbour reported screaming. They found McMahon there. None was aware of the restraining order, and each later accepted that, had they known of it, they would have arrested him. What the PNC showed that night was never established. No evidence about it was before either court, though the Court of Appeal considered there was reason to suspect the order was there to be seen [12] [49].’
2 Hare Court, 13th October 2026
Source: www.2harecourt.com
‘Appeals against the decisions of regulators, whether pursued by the professional or by the regulating body, are unpredictable affairs. Given the near-infinite variety of factual circumstances, it is difficult to lay down legal rules. So tribunal decisions on facts are “virtually unassailable” [Southall], but that should not be taken to mean “practically impossible” [Byrne] and appeal courts will “correct material errors of fact and law” [Jagjivan]. Whereas decisions on sanction attract respect with “particular force” [Fatnani], although “there may be matters such as dishonesty or sexual misconduct where the court is likely to feel that it can assess what is needed …” [Jagjivan again].’
2 Hare Court, 13th October 2026
Source: www.2harecourt.com
‘The Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has published the Government response to its Third Report of Session 2026–27, Protecting built heritage (HC 144).’
Law & Religion UK, 16th October 2026
Source: lawandreligionuk.com
‘Mr Rahman was referred to the GDC following a complaint by a dental nurse in 2023. The subsequent investigation uncovered a pattern of inappropriate, racial and sexual conduct towards mainly female staff and patients. The Committee found most of the alleged conduct proved but considered the majority of the sexual remarks were not sexually motivated. The Committee accepted an alternative explanation that the remarks were intended to be provocative or to “get a rise out of” someone, or were made with the intention of asserting authority, as opposed to them being sexually motivated. It imposed a six-month suspension.’
2 Hare Court, 13th October 2026
Source: www.2harecourt.com
‘Passengers who play loud music on buses in England could be fined up to £100 under an attempt by the government to crack down on antisocial behaviour.’
BBC News, 19th October 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A teenage hitman who travelled from Norway to the UK with the intention of carrying out a murder on behalf of an Iran-backed international crime gang has been jailed for 20 years.’
The Guardian, 16th October 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Bunting v Revenue and Customs [2026] EWCA Civ 1331 (16 October 2026)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Hindley, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1336 (16 October 2026)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Business & Property Division)
3Kings Holdings Ltd v TCF 1 GP Ltd [2026] EWHC 2620 (BP) (16 October 2026)
Fairmead Insurance Ltd & Ors, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 2644 (BP) (16 October 2026)
Exeter City Council v Macklin & Anor [2026] EWHC 2636 (BP) (16 October 2026)
Amber Construction Services Ltd v Ilyrian Construction Ltd [2026] EWHC 2603 (BP) (16 October 2026)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Stor RB One Ltd v Kanthasamy [2026] EWHC 2625 (Comm) (16 October 2026)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘The dispute arose from a defaulted loan facility to a company in Mr Gusinski’s New Media Group and a subsequent LCIA arbitration in 2018 against five guarantor companies. GSC acted for the guarantors in the arbitration and Barbara Dohmann KC appeared as leading counsel. In a claim brought in 2021, the Bank alleged that GSC and Mr Samuels had joined an unlawful means conspiracy orchestrated by their client, Mr Gusinski, to delay and ultimately avoid repaying the Bank. The Bank alleged that they did so principally by (i) advancing an allegedly unarguable Defence and Cross-Claim in the arbitration; and (ii) making representations on instructions to the arbitral tribunal about the availability of a US$5.2 million judgment sum held in GSC’s client account. The Bank also claimed that submissions made in support of a staged payment award had given it a proprietary interest in US$4.75 million of that judgment sum and on that basis also brought claims for breach of trust, knowing receipt and dishonest assistance.’
Blackstone Chambers, 8th October 2026
Source: www.blackstonechambers.com
‘In this episode, Naina and Sir Jeffrey explore the notion of the rule of law, what it means to Sir Jeffrey personally, and the extent to which it is universal. They discuss the ideas that have shaped his thinking on this topic and chart the start of his journey into this area, from his early experiences in South Africa into academia. Their conversation offers a fascinating insight into Sir Jeffrey’s evolving thinking on this fundamental principle of public law.’
Blackstone Chambers, 15th October 2026
Source: www.blackstonechambers.com
‘It is well-known that in the case of R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, the Supreme Court ruled that general language in primary legislation should not be taken to authorise the adoption of secondary legislation which interferes with fundamental common law rights.’
Administrative Court Blog, 15th October 2026
© Inner Temple Library 2026