Discontinuance, costs, and multiple Defendants: BAE Systems Pension Funds Trustees Ltd v Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd [2018] EWHC 1222 (TCC) – Zenith PI

Posted September 12th, 2018 in construction industry, contracts, costs, news, warehousing by tracey

‘This case is a reminder, if any were needed, of the difficulties facing Claimants in deciding whether or not to pursue multiple Defendants.’

Full Story

Zenith PI, 10th September 2018

Source: zenithpi.wordpress.com

Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners – Times Law Reports

Posted September 2nd, 2008 in capital allowances, corporation tax, law reports, warehousing by sally

Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners

House of Lords

“Expenditure on a warehouse which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building so as to qualify under section 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990.”

The Times, 2nd September 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners – WLR Daily

Posted August 4th, 2008 in capital allowances, corporation tax, law reports, warehousing by sally

Maco Door and Window Hardware (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2008] UKHL 54; [2008] WLR (D) 281

“The expenditure on a warehouse building which was used for storage of goods which the taxpayer was in the business of importing and selling was not expenditure on an industrial building and therefore did not qualify as a capital allowance under s 18 of the Capital Allowances Act 1990.”

WLR Daily, 1st August 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.