Category: law reports

Irish Reel Productions Ltd v Capitol Films Ltd – WLR daily

Posted February 12th, 2010 in costs, law reports, winding up by sally

Irish Reel Productions Ltd v Capitol Films Ltd [2010] EWHC 180 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 33

“Where a person presented a winding up petition and appeared at the hearing of an administration application the court had jurisdiction to order that the costs of prosecuting the petition were payable as an expense of the administration.”

WLR Daily, 11th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

In re G (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Application for leave to apply to discharge) – WLR Daily

Posted February 12th, 2010 in appeals, children, guardianship, law reports by sally

In re G (A Child) (Special Guardianship Order: Application for leave to apply to discharge) [2010] WLR (D) 32

“When a court was considering an application for leave to apply to discharge a special guardianship order pursuant to s 14D(5) of the Children Act 1989 it was important to adopt the correct approach to the question whether there had been a ‘change in circumstances’  for the purposes of that provision.”

WLR Daily, 11th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Guardian News and Media Ltd and others intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted February 12th, 2010 in confidentiality, intelligence services, law reports, public interest immunity, torture by sally

R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Guardian News and Media Ltd and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 65; [2010] WLR (D) 31

“As a general principle, the principles of freedom of expression, democratic accountability and the rule of law were integral to the principle of open justice, so that, where litigation had occurred and judgment given, any disapplication of the open justice principle (which included the ordinary right of all the parties to the litigation to know the reasons for the court’s decision) had to be rigidly contained. It should be rare for the court to order that any part of the reasoning in its judgment which had lead it to its conclusion should be redacted, and any such order should be made only in extreme cases.”

WLR Daily, 11th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R v Hancox and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2010 in appeals, crime prevention, law reports, serious crime prevention orders by sally

R v Hancox and another [2010] EWCA Crim 102; [2010] WLR (D) 30

“The interference that the imposition of a serious crime prevention order would make to a defendant’s freedom of action had to be justified by the public benefit in preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the defendant in serious crime; it was not enough that the order might have some benefit.”

WLR Daily, 10th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R v Carter (David) – WLR Daily

Posted February 11th, 2010 in juries, jury directions, law reports by sally

R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29

“Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror.”

WLR Daily, 10th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

McInnes v HM Advocate – Times Law Reports

Posted February 11th, 2010 in law reports by sally

McInnes v HM Advocate

Supreme Court

“When considering whether a criminal conviction in Scotland should be overturned because of a failure by the Crown to disclose witness statements to the defence, the question for the High Court of Justiciary to consider was whether, taking all the circumstances of the trial into account, there was a real possibility that the jury would have arrived at a different verdict if the material had been available.”

The Times, 11th February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 10th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Hussain & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 94 (20 January 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Tew & Ors v BoS (Shared Appreciation Mortgages) No 1 Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 203 (Ch) (22 January 2010)

High Court (Family Division)

Doctor A & Ors v Ward & Anor [2010] EWHC 205 (Fam) (09 February 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

W, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Brent [2010] EWHC 175 (Admin) (09 February 2010)

Hoole, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board [2010] EWHC 186 (Admin) (09 February 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Regina v Irving; Regina v Squires – Times Law Reports

Posted February 10th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Regina v Irving; Regina v Squires

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Greater efforts were needed to ensure that correct information was available to sentencing judges so that proper effect could be given to the requirement to give credit for half of the number of any days spent by an offender on bail subject to a qualifying curfew condition and an electronic monitoring condition.”

The Times, 10th February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 9th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Curtis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 123 (09 February 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

O’Beirne v Hudson [2010] EWCA Civ 52 (09 February 2010)

Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53 (09 February 2010)

B, R (on the application of) v Cornwall Council & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 55 (09 February 2010)

W (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 57 (09 February 2010)

Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 33 (09 February 2010)

D (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 50 (09 February 2010)

Huntley v Simmons [2010] EWCA Civ 54 (09 February 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Baldauf v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 151 (Admin) (19 January 2010)

Nursing and Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Akinleye [2010] EWHC 150 (Admin) (19 January 2010)

High Court (Commercial Court)

SOS Corporación Alimentaria, S.A. & Anor v Inerco Trade SA [2010] EWHC 162 (Comm) (08 February 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another – Times Law Reports

Posted February 9th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another

Queen’s Bench Division

“The erection and removal of straw bales, which concealed a new dwelling constructed without planning permission, formed part of the totality of building operations originally contemplated and intended to be carried out by the claimant.”

The Times, 9th February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 8th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Shah & Anor v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 31 (04 February 2010)

Moore v British Waterways Board [2010] EWCA Civ 42 (05 February 2010)

Norman Booth v Booth & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 27 (05 February 2010)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Perkes & Anor v R [2010] EWCA Crim 101 (05 February 2010)

RCPO v C [2010] EWCA Crim 97 (05 February 2010)

London Borough of Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 (05 February 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Gomes, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 168 (Admin) (05 February 2010)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Transworld Oil Ltd [2010] EWHC 141 (Comm) (03 February 2010)

SOS Corporación Alimentaria, S.A. & Anor v Inerco Trade SA [2010] EWHC 162 (Comm) (08 February 2010)

High Court (Patents Court)

Research In Motion UK Ltd v Motorola Inc [2010] EWHC 118 (Pat) (03 February 2010)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Ali v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 100 (QB) (27 January 2010)

Terry v Persons Unknown (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 119 (QB) (29 January 2010)

Debt Collect London Ltd & Anor v SK Slavia Praha- Fotbal A S [2010] EWHC 57 (QB) (02 February 2010)

Webster & Ors v Ridgeway Foundation School [2010] EWHC 157 (QB) (05 February 2010)

Jones v North West Strategic Health Authority [2010] EWHC 178 (QB) (05 February 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina – WLR Daily

Posted February 8th, 2010 in appeals, jurisdiction, law reports, state immunity by sally

NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2010] EWCA Civ 41; [2010] WLR (D) 28

“A court had no jurisdiction to permit a claimant to serve proceedings on a foreign state unless it was satisfied that there was, at the least, a good arguable case that the defendant state was not immune from suit. S 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 remained subject to the provisions of the State Immunity Act 1978 as regards the circumstances in which the courts could exercise jurisdiction over states when a claimant wished to implead them in those courts.”

WLR Daily, 5th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

 Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd – WLR Daily

Posted February 8th, 2010 in appeals, banking, law reports, money laundering by sally

Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 31; [2010] WLR (D) 27

“Where a bank claimed, for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, to entertain ‘suspicion’ about money-laundering concerning a proposed transaction on a customer’s account, and had failed to carry out instructions promptly, a customer might be entitled to proceed with a claim in breach of contract or duty.”

WLR Daily, 5th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court and another – WLR Daily

Posted February 8th, 2010 in appeals, costs, forfeiture, law reports by sally

R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court and another [2010] EWCA Civ 40; [2010] WLR (D) 26

“A magistrates’ court exercising its discretion under s 64(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 ‘to make an order for costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’  in relation to forfeiture proceedings successfully defended was entitled to refuse to order the police to pay the costs on the ground that they had acted honestly, properly and reasonably in bringing and continuing the proceedings in the public interest.”

WLR Daily, 5th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Attorney General’s Reference (No 79 of 2009) – WLR Daily

Posted February 8th, 2010 in attorney general, law reports, sentencing by sally

Attorney General’s Reference (No 79 of 2009) [2010] WLR (D) 25

“In considering whether a sentence was unduly lenient the question for the Court of Appeal was whether the sentencing judge had, on the material presented to the Crown Court, erred in principle.”

WLR Daily, 5th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice – WLR Daily

Posted February 8th, 2010 in damages, detention, law reports by sally

R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24

 “When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. There was no inconsistency between the terms of s 8 of the 1998 Act and the terms of art 5(5) and no basis for the assumption that compensation in art 5(5) was restricted in its meaning to money, and in some cases the finding of a violation would provide sufficient compensation for a breach of art 5(4).”

WLR Daily, 4th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk 

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA – Times Law Reports

Posted February 8th, 2010 in law reports by sally

National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA

Court of Appeal

“A judgment by a member state of the European Union, which ruled that an arbitration clause had not been incorporated into a contract and that proceedings should not be declined for that reason, although not on the merits of the case, was one that had to be enforced so that the English court was prevented from deciding the point differently.”

The Times, 8th February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 5th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

HM Treasury v Ahmed & Ors [2010] UKSC 5 (04 February 2010)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Hancox & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 102 (04 February 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Perinpanathan, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 40 (04 February 2010)

The Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2010] EWCA Civ 30 (04 February 2010)

Republic of Argentina v NML Capital Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 41 (04 February 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Griffin v Uhy Hacker Young & Partners (a firm) [2010] EWHC 146 (Ch) (04 February 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Fidler v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 143 (Admin) (03 February 2010)

Chester, R (on the application of) v The Governor of HMP Wakefield [2010] EWHC 63 (Admin) (22 January 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Regina v Iqbal – WLR Daily

Posted February 5th, 2010 in appeals, confiscation, law reports, time limits by sally

Regina v Iqbal [2010] WLR (D) 23

“An application for the time for proceedings for a confiscation order to be postponed, or for a postponement to be extended, may be made only during the permitted period provided for in s 14 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.”

WLR Daily, 4th February 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Barker (Steven) – Times Law Reports

Posted February 5th, 2010 in law reports by sally

Regina v Barker (Steven)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“It was not necessarily appropriate for a defence advocate to conduct detailed crossexamination of a child witness at trial in respect of evidence purported to undermine that child’s credibility.”

The Times, 5th February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk