The Supreme Court on “prohibitively expensive” costs: Aarhus again – UK Human Rights Blog

‘This is the last gasp in the saga on whether Mrs Pallikaropoulos should bear £25,000 of the costs of her unsuccessful 2008 appeal to the House of Lords. And the answer, after intervening trips to the Supreme Court in 2010 and to the CJEU in 2013, is a finding by the Supreme Court that she should bear those costs.’

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 11th December 2013

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com