Man jailed for mosque threats after synagogue attack – BBC News
‘A man who made death threats to two mosques in the wake of the Manchester synagogue attack has been jailed for more than two years.’
BBC News, 26th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A man who made death threats to two mosques in the wake of the Manchester synagogue attack has been jailed for more than two years.’
BBC News, 26th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A man has been jailed for sharing racist, neo-Nazi and antisemitic material including a video of a computer game about the Christchurch terror attack.’
BBC News, 26th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘The US has issued sanctions against the UK-based direct action organisation Palestine Action, describing it as a “transnational terror group”.’
The Guardian, 26th August 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘A worker at a UK mattress company sued for disability discrimination after she claimed a mattress fell on her and gave her brain damage.’
The Independent, 26th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has criticised the London Borough of Ealing for producing reports and assessments using incorrect information when considering concerns about a child.’
Local Government Lawyer, 25th August 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘A 2020 High Court judgment, R (Holborn Studios) v London Borough of Hackney, established for the first time, whether members of the public can write to councillors, and whether councillors can read those letters in advance of taking decisions.’
Local Government Lawyer, 26th August 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘The system which handles appeals against the Home Office’s asylum and immigration decisions looks set, once again, to be overhauled. If enacted, Part 1 of the Immigration and Asylum Bill would replace the existing First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum chamber) (FTIAC) with a new body known as the Independent Immigration Appeals Authority (IIAA) (clause 1). The existing jurisdictions of the FTIAC would be transferred to the IIAA meaning that, among other things, it would decide appeals against protection and human rights decisions (here, asylum appeals), immigration bail applications, challenges to citizenship deprivation and cases concerned with the application of the EU Citizen Resettlement schemes (clause 1(2)).’
UK Constitutional Law Association, 26th August 2026
Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org
‘A recent English High Court decision provides an important reminder that allegations of dishonesty, fraud and forgery will not by themselves be sufficient to obtain a worldwide freezing order (WFO), an expert has said.’
OUT-LAW.com, 25th August 2026
Source: www.pinsentmasons.com
‘Online service providers that lose their appeals against regulatory decisions taken under the UK’s Online Safety Act will not generally be ordered to pay the costs of the regulator after proposals to alter the current position on costs were dropped.’
OUT-LAW.com, 25th August 2026
Source: www.pinsentmasons.com
‘The performance of AI in the justice system is only being measured in terms of operational efficiencies, and not if it is actually helping people deal with legal issues, research has found.’
Legal Futures, 26th August 2026
Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk
‘A barrister who should have learnt from a previous disciplinary offence that his rudeness “demeans” himself and could damage “the Bar as a whole” has been fined.’
Legal Futures, 24th August 2026
Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk
‘An inspection into how a police force responds to violent incidents has been launched in the wake of Henry Nowak’s murder.’
BBC News, 25th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A 19-year-old student who fatally stabbed a former friend in the heart following a dispute over a fake Rolex watch has been jailed for 10 years for manslaughter.’
The Independent, 25th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
LAU, R (On the Application Of) v The Family Court at Croydon [2026] EWCA Civ 1115 (04 August 2026)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
AGC & Ors, R. v (Reporting Restriction Decision) [2026] EWCA Crim 1021 (25 August 2026)
Coulson, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1097 (21 August 2026)
Haycock v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 1105 (21 August 2026)
TIR, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1106 (06 August 2026)
Procyk, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1104 (05 August 2026)
O’Brien, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1098 (04 August 2026)
Dookhun, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1099 (04 August 2026)
Uddin, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1122 (28 July 2026)
Smith, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1123 (28 July 2026)
High Court (Administrative Court)
XUY, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Croydon [2026] EWHC 2214 (Admin) (17 August 2026)
Otabor, R (on the application of) v Student Loans Company [2026] EWHC 2168 (Admin) (12 August 2026)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Bisiker v Bisiker & Ors [2026] EWHC 2070 (Ch) (24 August 2026)
LM1 Ltd v Seacroft Film Investments Ltd [2026] EWHC 2212 (Ch) (21 August 2026)
Doubtfire v Horrell [2026] EWHC 2173 (Ch) (21 August 2026)
High Court (Family Division)
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Hughes & Ors v World Rugby Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 2149 (KB) (21 August 2026)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘Coroners examine deaths that are not straightforward, like unexpected or violent deaths, or those that take place in state custody. Every year, thousands of British families rely on these courts for crucial answers. For many, an inquest provides the key interaction with the arms of the state at a time of trauma.’
BBC News, 25th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘August 2026 sees the 30th anniversary of the Employment Rights Act 1996 coming into force. In the words of the Lord Chancellor at the time, it (with the linked Industrial Tribunals Act 1996) restated ‘most of the employment legislation which remained unconsolidated after the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992’ (HL Deb Vol 568, col 468 (16 January 1996)), including the legislation which, inter alia, provided protection from unfair dismissal (the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978). When the Employment Rights Act 1996 was passed it had 245 sections and, with its schedules, ran to some 176 pages. It has been much amended since then and now has some 435 sections covering over 450 pages (including references to the amending legislation), with, for example, 56 sections covering zero hours and similar contracts and tips inserted between sections 27 and 28 by a combination of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015, the Employment Rights Act 2025 and the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023.’
UK Labour Law, 25th August 2026
Source: uklabourlawblog.com
‘The Upper Tribunal has recently ruled that the Home Office has been acting unlawfully, for at least nine years, by failing to publish its policy of only ever granting 12 months’ permission to remain in the UK to certain victims of modern slavery under section 65 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 (colloquially known as “VTS leave”). The Secretary of State was under a duty to publish the details of this policy, so that applicants could make meaningful representations in relation to it. Failure to do so constituted a public law error. The case is R (TK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] UKUT 316 (IAC) (29 June 2026).’
Administrative Court Blog, 24th August 2026
‘A pregnant saleswoman was the victim of discrimination when her colleague told her “nobody wants to see a pregnant woman”, a tribunal ruled.’
The Independent, 24th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘Survivors of violent crime and families of victims have criticised the UK government for announcing “world first” plans to introduce restriction zones for serious offenders freed from prison within a few weeks without spelling out how they would work.’
The Guardian, 24th August 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘In Doubtfire v Horrell [2026] EWHC 2173 (Ch) (‘Doubtfire’), Chief ICC Judge Briggs heard an application to set aside a statutory demand (‘SD’) served on an individual/(alleged) debtor (‘D’), by an alleged creditor (‘H’), on grounds under Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (the ‘Rules’), r.10.5(5), that:
(a) ‘the debtor appears to have a counterclaim, set-off or cross demand which equals or exceeds the amount of the debt specified in the statutory demand;’
(b) ‘the debt is disputed on grounds which appear to the court to be substantial;’
(d) ‘the court is satisfied, on other grounds, that the demand ought to be set aside.’
33 Bedford Row, 23rd August 2026
Source: www.33bedfordrow.co.uk