Surgeon struck off after wrongly connecting organs – BBC News
‘A doctor who botched an operation so badly it was described as “not compatible with life” has been struck off the medical register.’
BBC News, 4th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A doctor who botched an operation so badly it was described as “not compatible with life” has been struck off the medical register.’
BBC News, 4th August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A teacher who amended pupils’ coursework and awarded their grades “dishonestly” has been banned from the classroom.’
The Independent, 4th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘The court of appeal on Tuesday [4th August] dismissed a bid by local campaign groups to challenge an earlier high court ruling that the scheme could proceed.’
The Guardian, 4th August 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Barclay & Anor v Secretary of State for Transport [2026] EWCA Civ 1040 (04 August 2026)
Argence-Lafon v Ark Syndicate Management Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 1039 (04 August 2026)
Re B (A Child: Uncertain Perpetrator) [2026] EWCA Civ 1024 (31 July 2026)
Orton v Barclays Bank UK Plc [2026] EWCA Civ 1025 (31 July 2026)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Espire Infolabs Ltd v Sharma [2026] EWHC 2061 (Ch) (04 August 2026)
Hawridge Strategic Land Ltd v Millen Homes Ltd [2026] EWHC 1934 (Ch) (04 August 2026)
High Court (Commercial Court)
A1 & Ors v P [2026] EWHC 2030 (Comm) (31 July 2026)
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Harforth v Rose Island Properties Ltd [2026] EWHC 2037 (KB) (31 July 2026)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
TTSJV WLL & Ors v BapCo Refining BSC [2026] EWHC 2047 (TCC) (04 August 2026)
E & TL Jones (Civils) Ltd v Vale of Glamorgan Council [2026] EWHC 2054 (TCC) (04 August 2026)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘Four men and a woman have been found guilty of being part of a grooming gang that exploited teenage girls for sex.’
BBC News, 3rd August 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘Animal rights campaigners who say they were wrongly arrested for planning to disrupt the King’s coronation are taking legal action against the Metropolitan Police.’
The Independent, 4th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘Public lawyers are familiar with the jurisdiction to grant a declaration where a claim has become academic, in circumstances where there is “good reason in the public interest”, and to do so would serve a “real and practical” purpose. Fordham J declined the invitation to grant declaratory relief relief in Wild Justice ont he basis that the alleged unlawful act had not in fact taken place; he was being asked a hypothetical, “would-if” question rather than dealing with an academic claim.’
Administrative Court Blog, 31st July 2026
‘In Mr R Daudet v Computacenter (UK) Limited [2024] 2301071/2023, Mr Daudet claimed unfair dismissal under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996; direct discrimination because of race and/or religion or belief under s.13 Equality Act 2020, harassment related to race and/or religion or belief under s.26 Equality Act, and breach of contract. In brief, Computacenter said that the reason for his dismissal was that he had harassed a female employee.’
Law & Religion UK, 4th August 2026
Source: lawandreligionuk.com
‘Section 63(3) is a non-mandatory provision of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the act), which confers on the arbitral tribunal the power to determine the recoverable costs of the arbitration on such basis as it considers appropriate, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. Where it does so, the tribunal must specify the basis on which the costs have been assessed, the items of recoverable costs and the amount awarded for each item (s63(3)(a) and (b))).’
Law Society's Gazette, 31st July 2026
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
‘The Independent has repeatedly called for all IPP prisoners to have their sentences reviewed as 2,400 languish in jail, many for petty crimes and some locked up as children, with no hope of release.’
The Independent, 4th August 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘The court term in England & Wales ends today, 31 July 2026. Whilst this does not mean that the Court of Protection (or indeed the other courts) stop hearing cases, it does mean that there may now be a lull in what has been an exceptionally busy period for those concerned with mental capacity matters. We do not have an August Mental Capacity Report (for the July one – with huge thanks to Arianna Kelly for taking this on in my absence – see here); pending the September Report, there have been further developments in July which do merit flagging.’
Mental Capacity Law and Policy, 1st August 2026
‘A man has been jailed for keeping his dead mother’s body in a freezer at their shared home for almost three years, during which time he received more than £70,000 of her benefits and other funds.’
The Guardian, 3rd August 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Sucden Financial Ltd v TMT Metals AG & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 986 (31 July 2026)
Lay & Anor v Independent Vetcare Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 1027 (31 July 2026)
Manaquel Company Ltd v London Borough of Lambeth [2026] EWCA Civ 972 (29 July 2026)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Kelenda v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 1002 (31 July 2026)
Nuttall & Anor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1013 (17 July 2026)
Freeland & Anor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1006 (16 July 2026)
Green, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1003 (15 July 2026)
Suyolcu, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 1001 (14 July 2026)
Price, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 975 (09 July 2026)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Vernon v Nursing And Midwifery Council [2026] EWHC 1953 (Admin) (28 July 2026)
Bogdan v Gyor Regional Court (Hungary) [2026] EWHC 2017 (Admin) (27 July 2026)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Peter Waddell Holdco Ltd v Bluebell Cars Holding Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 2028 (Ch) (31 July 2026)
Palmer & Anor v P1 Pit Stop Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 1924 (Ch) (31 July 2026)
High Court (Commercial Court)
JKD & Anor v IKC [2026] EWHC 2031 (Comm) (31 July 2026)
High Court (Family Division)
N and S (Habitual Residence), Re [2026] EWHC 2032 (Fam) (31 July 2026)
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Oxfordshire County Council v Cullen & Ors [2026] EWHC 2019 (KB) (31 July 2026)
Manners & Ors v The Cabinet Office & Ors [2026] EWHC 2036 (KB) (31 July 2026)
Perseus Ventures Ltd v Foskett & Ors [2026] EWHC 2008 (KB) (31 July 2026)
Tooley v Times Media Ltd [2026] EWHC 2027 (KB) (31 July 2026)
Drive Time Motors Ltd v Creditsafe Business Solutions Ltd [2026] EWHC 2025 (KB) (31 July 2026)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘Robert Bowker looks at the First-tier Tribunal’s remediation order in Oyster Bay and considers its significance for local authorities exercising their powers under the Building Safety Act 2022.’
Tanfield Chambers, 13th July 2026
Source: tanfieldchambers.co.uk
‘The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa is now the leading authority on the scope of the good‑faith obligation under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 (‘CA 2006’). The Court unanimously held that a director’s genuine belief that they are acting in the company’s best interests will not excuse conduct that is misleading, exclusionary, or inconsistent with the duty of loyalty owed to the board. The judgment recalibrates the boundary between legitimate business judgment and fiduciary loyalty, with significant implications for unfair prejudice petitions, shareholder agreements, and corporate governance.’
St Philips Barristers, 29th July 2026
Source: st-philips.com
‘The appeal concerned D, a seven-year-old child who had remained living with her father and attending her existing school after her parents separated. The mother applied for D to move approximately 50 miles away to live with her and change schools, alleging domestic abuse and coercive and controlling behaviour by the father. Although Cafcass initially recommended a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court decided that one was unnecessary. A later section 7 report nevertheless assessed the disputed allegations, regarded the mother’s account as more compelling and recommended an immediate transfer of D’s residence to the mother as the “only emotionally safe option”. The Deputy District Judge adopted that recommendation and ordered D to live with the mother and change schools. The father’s first appeal was dismissed in relation to residence and schooling.’
St. John's Chambers, 31st July 2026
Source: www.stjohnschambers.co.uk
‘We are delighted to launch the first issue of the St John’s Buildings Employment Newsletter, which we hope will be of interest to all Employment law practitioners. In this edition we have five articles from experienced members of the St John’s Buildings team: Jason Searle, Kevin McNerney, Diarmuid Bunting and Tarlun Ahari, tackling subjects including Vicarious Liability in Employment Law, Legal Privilege and Without Prejudice Communications, Issues of International Jurisdiction in the Employment Tribunal, Interim Relief: A Guide for Respondent Employers, and Medicinal Cannabis and Disability Discrimination.’
St. John's Buildings, 28th July 2026
Source: stjohnsbuildings.com
‘We’re pleased to launch the first edition of our Criminal Law Newsletter, bringing together practical updates, commentary and guidance on key developments in criminal law.’
St. Ives Chambers, 8th July 2026
Source: stiveschambers.co.uk
‘The Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC) is to produce a voluntary Code of Practice which will set out inclusion standards, technology and data standards and standards for the responsible and ethical use of AI.’
Local Government Lawyer, 31st July 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘A Divisional Court has dismissed a statutory review challenge brought by local residents over the decision by the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government in January this year to grant planning permission for an embassy for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on the site of the former Royal Mint in east London.’
Local Government Lawyer, 31st July 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk