Lifely v Lifely – WLR Daily

Posted August 4th, 2008 in admissibility, evidence, human rights, law reports by sally

Lifely v Lifely [2008] EWCA Civ 904; [2008] WLR (D) 280

“Where fresh evidence had arguably been wrongfully obtained considerations beyond the classical requirements under the Ladd v Marshall test might be appropriate when the court was considering whether such evidence should be admitted.”

WLR Daily, 1st August 2008


Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.