‘In TBD (which was covered in the article by Niran de Silva KC and Sam Neaman in the April 2024 edition of ELA Briefing), the Court of Appeal approved the use of imaging orders (an order that requires a defendant to permit a forensic computer expert to make a complete copy of their electronic devices) as a less intrusive alternative to a search order (an order that requires a defendant to allow the claimant’s representatives to enter their premises and search for, copy and remove documents). Since then, there has been some debate over the relevant threshold for granting an imaging order, with a degree of inconsistency appearing in the authorities. In the recently published judgment of Nix, HH Judge Pelling KC expressed support for the view that the grounds for granting an imaging order are slightly less stringent than for granting a search order. He also identified the factors that are likely to be most relevant to obtaining an imaging order where the complaint is of unacceptable conduct in relation to disclosure and/or the preservation of documents.’

Full Story

Blackstone Chambers, 7th February 2025

Source: www.employeecompetition.com