BAILII: Recent Decisions
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Leicester City Council v Parmar [2025] EWCA Civ 952 (22 July 2025)
Vesnin v Queeld Ventures Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 951 (22 July 2025)
Moakes, R (On the Application Of) v Canterbury City Council) [2025] EWCA Civ 927 (21 July 2025)
National House Building Council v Peabody Trust [2025] EWCA Civ 932 (21 July 2025)
AstraZeneca AB & Anor v Generics (UK) Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 924 (21 July 2025)
K & G (Care Proceedings: Fact-Finding) [2025] EWCA Civ 910 (18 July 2025)
Buckinghamshire Council v FCC Buckinghamshire Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 921 (18 July 2025)
Republic of Korea v Elliott Associates, LP [2025] EWCA Civ 905 (17 July 2025)
Generics (UK) Ltd & Ors v AstraZenica AB [2025] EWCA Civ 903 (16 July 2025)
F (A Child), Re (Habitual Residence) [2025] EWCA Civ 911 (16 July 2025)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Green, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 923 (18 July 2025)
High Court (Administrative Court)
Bielicki v The Circuit Court In Lodz, Poland [2025] EWHC 1861 (Admin) (21 July 2025)
Dean v The Bar Standards Board (BSB) [2025] EWHC 1860 (Admin) (21 July 2025)
Protecting Our Park Ltd v Cheshire East Borough Council [2025] EWHC 1848 (Admin) (18 July 2025)
British Telecommunication PLC (BT) v Crown Court at Carlisle [2025] EWHC 1826 (Admin) (17 July 2025)
Forbes, In the Matter Of [2025] EWHC 1692 (Admin) (17 July 2025)
Singh v General Dental Council [2025] EWHC 1761 (Admin) (15 July 2025)
Graysons Freight Services Ltd & Anor v Revenue And Customs [2025] EWHC 1800 (Admin) (15 July 2025)
High Court (Chancery Division)
Avison & Anor v Harold Bell Infields & Co (A Firm) [2025] EWHC 1787 (Ch) (21 July 2025)
Griffiths & Anor v Wheatley & Ors (Wall Lag (Wales) Ltd) (Rev1) [2025] EWHC 1843 (Ch) (18 July 2025)
Armstrong & Anor v Harrow [2025] EWHC 1790 (Ch) (18 July 2025)
Bourlakova & Ors v The Estate of Oleg Bourlakov & Ors [2025] EWHC 1792 (Ch) (18 July 2025)
Gu v Whibberley & Ors [2025] EWHC 1816 (Ch) (17 July 2025)
Christophi & Ors v RP Design and Construction Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 1817 (Ch) (16 July 2025)
Gupta & Anor v Shah & Ors [2025] EWHC 1811 (Ch) (15 July 2025)
High Court (Commercial Court)
JP Morgan International Finance Ltd v WEREALIZE.COM Ltd [2025] EWHC 1842 (Comm) (18 July 2025)
Alta Trading UK Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Ors [2025] EWHC 1837 (Comm) (18 July 2025)
Urania Shipping Company Ltd v Nordtrade SIA & Anor [2025] EWHC 1835 (Comm) (18 July 2025)
LCN Sapphire Trustee 1 Ltd & Anor v Wiseman & Ors [2025] EWHC 1839 (Comm) (17 July 2025)
McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2025] EWHC 1825 (Comm) (15 July 2025)
National Bank Trust v Pishchulina [2025] EWHC 1807 (Comm) (15 July 2025)
Visalia Marketing Corp & Anor v Seadrill Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 1747 (Comm) (10 July 2025)
High Court (Family Division)
ED v MG [2025] EWHC 1876 (Fam) (22 July 2025)
ZA v YB (Appeal: Extending S91(14) Order: Unfair Procedure) [2025] EWHC 1869 (Fam) (21 July 2025)
T v H [2025] EWHC 1875 (Fam) (09 July 2025)
High Court (Patents Court)
MediaTek, Inc & Ors v Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 1857 (Pat) (17 July 2025)
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Zaloumis v Steele [2025] EWHC 1858 (KB) (22 July 2025)
Kul & Ors v DWF Law LLP [2025] EWHC 1824 (KB) (22 July 2025)
Coombs v Hayes & Anor [2025] EWHC 1859 (KB) (21 July 2025)
Darchem Engineering Ltd v Richardson [2025] EWHC 1812 (KB) (18 July 2025)
Al-Azzawi v Moustafa [2025] EWHC 1836 (KB) (18 July 2025)
Cannestra v McLaren Automotive Events Ltd [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB) (18 July 2025)
Ness v Miller [2025] EWHC 1784 (KB) (15 July 2025)
BCD v Simons Muirhead Burton LLP [2025] EWHC 1088 (KB) (04 July 2025)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
VMA Services Ltd v Project One London Ltd [2025] EWHC 1815 (TCC) (18 July 2025)
Source: www.bailii.org
Driver who inhaled nitrous oxide gas before and after killing cyclist jailed – The Guardian
‘A man who was driving without a licence and inhaled nitrous oxide before and after killing an 81-year-old cyclist at a pedestrian crossing has been detained for more than 11 years.’
The Guardian, 21st July 2025
Source: www.theguardian.com
David Erdos: The UK Information Commissioner’s Annual Report 2024/25: Surveying a Systematic Trend Away from Adequate Enforcement – UK Constitutional Law Association
‘The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Annual Report for 2024/25 released last week sadly provides evidence of a severe and serious weakening of information rights regulation compared to the strong enforcement which is (and remains) promised especially under the (UK) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Despite even last year’s Report generally revealing formal enforcement such as fines, criminal prosecutions and criminal cautions which were in the single digits only, the Report now omits any reference to UK GDPR enforcement notices (as there were none at all during 2024/25) and states that there were just 2 UK GDPR fines during the year (which compares to >200 in both Germany and Spain) and that even the number of outcomes resulting in reprimands fell from 31 to just 9 (a 70% reduction). Coming on top of concerns over the lack of enforcement action in response to many egregious data breaches including one which put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk of grave harm and possibly even caused death, the Report also reveals that the number of reported data breaches which even resulted in a GDPR investigation (let alone enforcement action) dropped from a mere 6% to just 3%. At the same time, the number of data protection complaints which received no response during the expected 90 day timeframe sky-rocketed from just 15.2% in 2023/24 to 70% in 2024/25 (a 360% increase). As the review of the UK’s EU data adequacy status commences later this year, questions must be asked about these worrying trends and what (if anything) can be done to address them.’
UK Constitutional Law Association, 22nd July 2025
Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org
Aldi’s appeal canned by the Supreme Court – Law Society’s Gazette
‘In January, in Thatchers v Aldi [2025] EWCA Civ 5, the Court of Appeal found that Aldi Stores Ltd’s (Aldi) Taurus Cloudy Lemon Cider infringed Thatchers Cider Company Ltd’s (Thatchers) registered trade mark. That decision marked a turning point for brand owners seeking to challenge supermarket lookalikes. With the Supreme Court’s endorsement, the legal position has been further cemented in favour of brand protection.’
Law Society's Gazette, 18th July 2025
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
Thomas Horsley: Reforming the UK Internal Market: The UK Government’s Response to the Review of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 – UK Constitutional Law Association
‘On 15th July 2025, the UK Government (UKG) published its response to its review and public consultation on Parts 1 and 2 of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (UKIMA). The Response confirms the UKG’s commitment to (re)position the Common Frameworks (sector-specific intergovernmental agreements coordinating policy in devolved areas previously governed by EU law) ahead of the UKIMA to manage future policy divergence in devolved areas affecting intra-UK trade. It also details six reforms that the UKG will bring forward in coming months. After setting out some brief background to the Review, the first part of this post explores the UKG’s reform proposals, with a focus on changes to the existing UKIMA exclusion process. Thereafter, this post reflects on the UKG’s broader aspiration to manage intra-UK trade under devolution primarily by consensus through the Common Frameworks, rather than by imposition under the UKIMA.’
UK Constitutional Law Association, 21st July 2025
Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org
Man who decapitated and dismembered London couple convicted of murder – The Guardian
‘A man has been found guilty of murdering two men in London whom he decapitated and dismembered before taking their body parts in two suitcases to the Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol.’
The Guardian, 21st July 2025
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Substantial changes’ on infected blood payouts – BBC News
‘The government has said it is making “substantial changes” to the compensation scheme for thousands of victims of the infected blood scandal.’
BBC News, 22nd July 2025
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
Plans to expand Wimbledon can go ahead, judge rules – BBC News
‘Plans to almost triple the size of the Wimbledon tennis site are set to proceed after a campaign group’s legal challenge against the decision to grant planning permission was dismissed by a High Court judge.’
BBC News, 21st July 2025
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
Woman jailed for 15 years for shaking her four-month-old baby to death – The Guardian
‘A woman has been jailed for 15 years for killing her four-month-old daughter by violently shaking her.’
The Guardian, 21st July 2025
Source: www.theguardian.com
Evidence in sexual offences prosecutions: a final report – Law Commission
‘The purpose of this project is to review the law, practice, guidance and procedure in sexual offences cases and to make recommendations for reform to improve the understanding of consent and sexual harm, improve treatment of complainants, and ensure that defendants receive a fair trial.’
Law Commission, 22nd July 2025
Source: lawcom.gov.uk
Chancel Repair Liability – Law Commission Consultation – Law & Religion UK
‘On 15 July 2025, the Law Commission published its Consultation on Chancel repair liability and registration. The Law Commission is consulting on reforms to the law governing land registration and chancel repair liability. This project aims to close a historic loophole and save homeowners millions in insurance costs. Those with an interest in this area of law, or are affected by or have the benefit of a chancel repair liability, are requested to complete the questionnaire.’
Law & Religion UK, 21st July 2025
Source: lawandreligionuk.com
The Afghan super-injunction case: Some constitutional implications – Public Law for Everyone
‘Following a catastrophic administrative error placing the lives of thousands of Afghans at risk, the UK government obtained a super-injunction, enabling it to attempt to clear up the mess it had created behind a veil of impenetrable secrecy. The courts’ willingness to keep the super-injunction in place for nearly two years raises some important constitutional questions.’
Public Law for Everyone, 17th July 2025
Source: publiclawforeveryone.com
Upper Tribunal upholds civil penalty against landlord for failure to comply with improvement notice – Local Government Lawyer
‘The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) has dismissed an appeal by a landlord against a £3,000 civil penalty imposed by Swale Borough Council for failing to comply with an improvement notice, finding that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) was entitled to conclude that no reasonable excuse had been established.’
Local Government Lawyer, 21st July 2025
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
An inquest after a murder: Coroner’s decision not to resume is upheld despite Article 2 challenge – UK Human Rights Blog
‘At the heart of the case of R (Bailey) v HM Senior Coroner for East London [2025] EWHC 1637 (Admin), a tragedy: the murder of a 14-year-old boy, Jaden Bailey, and the profound grief of his mother. Jaden had been drawn into criminal activity, first in Nottinghamshire, then London. In October 2018 he had been found at a “cuckoo house” in Bournemouth, in possession of cocaine, a mobile phone and £325 in cash. He was brought back to London by the Metropolitan Police, following which an action plan was prepared by the Children’s Social Care Department of the London Borough of Waltham Forest. In November 2018 Jaden was permanently excluded from school after a Snapchat video showed him in possession of an imitation firearm, for which he was arrested and charged, pleading guilty. On 8 January 2019 Jaden was riding a moped in Leyton when he was hit by a car; the occupants of the car got out and stabbed Jaden. He died at the scene.’
UK Human Rights Blog, 21st July 2025
Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com
Addressing unsuitability and mandatory orders- Nearly Legal
‘R (ex parte AIN) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets. High Court (Admin) 29 April 2025 (Unreported elsewhere. We have a full note of judgment (unapproved) from the claimant’s solicitors, Osbornes Law, for which we are grateful). It is interesting in its treatment of the ‘five factors’ for consideration in making a mandatory order set out in Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45.
Nearly Legal, 20th July 2025
Source: nearlylegal.co.uk
New independent watchdog signed into law in watershed moment for English football – The Independent
‘An independent football regulator has been signed into UK law after the Football Governance Act received royal assent, giving fans a greater say in how their clubs are run.’
The Independent, 21st July 2025
Source: www.independent.co.uk
A failed reunification plan – Transparency Project
‘A 13 year old boy was refusing to obey High Court orders that he spend time with his mother following his parents’ separation. After three years of failed attempts to persuade him to see her, the court asked the Tipstaff’s office to enforce an order that he be collected from his home with his father and taken to spend four weeks with his mother in a ‘protective placement’. (The Tipstaff is an officer of the High Court, based at the Royal Courts of Justice, who can be called on by the court to enforce orders and warrants in England and Wales.) The boy refused to go with them and claimed he was physically assaulted by the court-appointed officers.’
Transparency Project, 20th July 2025
Source: transparencyproject.org.uk