The relevance (or otherwise) of the Equality Act 2010 – General Medical Council v Shah [2025] EWHC 899 (Admin) – 2 Hare Court
‘Dr Shah faced a number of allegations from Colleague A and B. The Tribunal rejected much of Colleague A’s evidence. Dr Shah did, however, admit he had called her “a good girl” on occasions, and that he called one or more female colleagues “bird”. This constituted harassment related to sex. In relation to Colleague B, the Tribunal found the Respondent inappropriately touched her without consent. In October 2014, he put his arm around her shoulder, leaned in to hug her, and squeezed her bottom. In October 2019, he brushed his body against her breasts, put his hand on her hip and squeezed her bottom. This constituted sexual harassment and was sexually motivated. Of course, the Tribunal considered these acts did amount to misconduct, justified impairment, and ultimately led it to imposed a sanction of 12 months suspension with review.’
2 Hare Court, 15th April 2025
Source: www.2harecourt.com