Libel claim against Matt Hancock thrown out – BBC News
‘A libel case against former Health Secretary Matt Hancock has been thrown out at the Court of Appeal.’
BBC News, 29th July 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘A libel case against former Health Secretary Matt Hancock has been thrown out at the Court of Appeal.’
BBC News, 29th July 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
‘The father of British music sensation Amy Winehouse has been ordered to pay £950,000 (US$1.26m, A$1.82m) to his late daughter’s friends, who he unsuccessfully sued for auctioning the singer’s clothes and other items.’
The Guardian, 30th July 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘Clive Moys recently featured in the June edition of LexisNexis Corporate Rescue and Insolvency for his article, “Another piece in the jigsaw: non-domestic rate liability for unoccupied commercial property despite a CVA.” In this article, Clive examines the Divisional Court’s recent decision in the Robinson Webster (Holdings) Limited (RWHL) appeal and its implications for tenants, landlords and billing authorities.’
Radcliffe Chambers, 15th July 2026
Source: radcliffechambers.com
‘Matthew Mills has recently published an article in Private Client Business on the jurisdiction to make administrative schemes for charities. The article draws together the key English authorities, including the recent Dasji v Bhudia [2026] EWHC 455 (Ch), and the key Australian decisions. It explains the test for making an administrative scheme, the evidence which the court and the Charity Commission will want to see, the terms which may be included in an administrative scheme, and the future of administrative schemes generally.’
Radcliffe Chambers, 21st July 2026
Source: radcliffechambers.com
‘The case concerns a partnership founded during the COVID-19 pandemic to sell lateral flow tests (“LFTs”). Following the dissolution of the partnership, both partners continued selling COVID-19 LFTs through different entities, making substantial sums of money.’
Radcliffe Chambers, 28th July 2026
Source: radcliffechambers.com
‘The legal and economic foundations of “class action”-style competition claims are being tested with increased vigour in the UK. The evidence for this view lies in how the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) and appeal courts have scrutinised whether claims, settlements and funding arrangements are proportionate, workable and aligned with class members’ interests in a raft of recent competition collective proceedings. That trend is now unfolding alongside a new UK government consultation on making opt-out collective actions, regulatory appeals and competition enforcement “swifter and simpler”.’
OUT-LAW.com, 29th July 2026
Source: www.pinsentmasons.com
‘An Employment Tribunal has recently given its reasons for concluding why pride displays in a workplace were not discriminatory against a claimant’s religious belief or disability. Robin White and Rachel Wall examine the ruling.’
Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘Paul Henty examines how the first significant application of the rewritten procurement protocol in the 2026 TCC Guide changes what contracting authorities should expect when faced with a procurement challenge.’
Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘In London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett [2026] EAT 77, the employer (“Respondent”) appealed against a decision of the Employment Tribunal (“ET”) which had, by majority, found that the Respondent had directly discriminated against the employee (“Claimant”) on the grounds of belief. The ET also upheld one complaint of direct race discrimination.’
Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026
Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk
‘This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms to financial remedies law: a starting point of sharing matrimonial property, with the possibility of a departure from an equal division where this is required to meet needs. There are two reasons for this narrow focus. The first is a lack of space to consider every potential issue with the proposed scheme. The second is more pragmatic. Law reform in this area is important. This is particularly true in relation to the law relating to cohabitants, where the current lack of protection is highly problematic, and to the law relating to pre-nuptial agreements where, as Sharon Thompson has convincingly argued, there is a real need for legislative safeguards.’
Financial Remedies Journal, 28th July 2026
Source: financialremediesjournal.com
‘FAZ v MAZ [2026] EWFC 131. This judgment of Poole J concerned allegations of sexual abuse in private law children proceedings. At the outset Poole J observed, expectedly, that where the court has to determine allegations of sexual abuse of a child by a parent “the stakes are high”.’
Pump Court Chambers, 13th July 2026
Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com
‘A client asked me a simple question at court recently: “If the court makes a money order, does that mean they get a CCJ?”
The instinctive answer is “yes”. A County Court money judgment is, in ordinary language, a CCJ. But in possession proceedings the answer is more complicated, and rather odd.’
Pump Court Chambers, 15th July 2026
Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com
‘Two complainants, similar stories, one registered professional: should fitness to practise committees consider the accounts together to rebut coincidence? High Court guidance in Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v The General Medical Council and Dr Neill Charles Garrard [2025] EWHC 318 (Admin) (‘Garrard’) clarifies when and how fitness to practise panels may cross‑admit evidence to assess the improbability of coincidence. This post explains the coincidence approach to cross‑admissibility and highlights the importance of being live to the issue throughout the life of a case.’
Pump Court Chambers, 27th July 2026
Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com
‘The former captain of a prestigious London yacht club, who led a campaign against the club’s commodore over mooring fees for his 80-foot Dutch barge, has been cleared of harassment allegations at London’s High Court.’
The Independent, 29th July 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘A fan of TV serial killer Dexter has been found guilty of murdering two homeless men whose bodies were dismembered and hidden in woodland before he killed his cellmate while awaiting trial.’
The Independent, 28th July 2026
Source: www.independent.co.uk
‘The campaign group Led By Donkeys has received £27,000 in compensation after a giant banner it displayed in Parliament Square saying “Yes It’s A Genocide” was seized by Greater London Authority officials and destroyed.’
The Guardian, 28th July 2026
Source: www.theguardian.com
‘A mother and her new boyfriend have been found guilty of murdering her two-year-old daughter, with the man also convicted of sexually abusing the girl.’
BBC News, 28th July 2026
Source: www.bbc.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
HB, Re (Appointment of Personal Welfare Deputy) [2026] EWCA Civ 960 (24 July 2026)
Culligan v Rosemin-Culligan [2026] EWCA Civ 948 (24 July 2026)
Suresh & Ors v General Medical Council [2026] EWCA Civ 955 (24 July 2026)
Faraj v Ahmad & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 962 (24 July 2026)
Baqir Al-Chaalan & Anor v Abri Group Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 946 (24 July 2026)
Al Othman Holding Company v Al Rajhi Holding WLL [2026] EWCA Civ 949 (23 July 2026)
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Menon, Re Contempt Proceedings Against [2026] EWCA Crim 966 (24 July 2026)
Hedges, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 963 (24 July 2026)
Xiao v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 957 (24 July 2026)
Ledgeway v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 956 (24 July 2026)
Shofah-El-Israel, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 954 (16 July 2026)
Brown & Anor, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 941 (08 July 2026)
Lunn, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 934 (07 July 2026)
CHA, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 932 (07 July 2026)
Shafiq, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 921 (02 July 2026)
High Court (Administrative Court)
High Court (Chancery Division)
De Menezes v Alves & Ors [2026] EWHC 1906 (Ch) (24 July 2026)
Float Capital Ltd, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 1891 (Ch) (24 July 2026)
High Court (Commercial Court)
Wei & Anor v Junhong [2026] EWHC 1892 (Comm) (24 July 2026)
Soprim Construction SARL v The Republic of Djibouti [2026] EWHC 1850 (Comm) (24 July 2026)
Smithers & Anor v Persons Unknown Category 1 & Ors [2026] EWHC 1907 (Comm) (24 July 2026)
High Court (Family Division)
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Rice v Napril Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 1897 (KB) (24 July 2026)
Foster & Anor v Wargrave on Thames Housing Association Ltd [2026] EWHC 1910 (KB) (24 July 2026)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Netomnia Ltd v MJ Quinn Integrated Services Ltd [2026] EWHC 1824 (TCC) (24 July 2026)
Source: www.bailii.org
‘Parklane Plowden barrister Cait Sweeney and head of the Chancery team, Nicola Phillipson, are joined by Henry Straw, associate solicitor at IDR Law, to explore the legal principles, challenges and considerations when children seek financial provision from a deceased person’s estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.’
Park Lane Plowden, 24th July 2026
Source: www.parklaneplowden.co.uk
‘Nicola Newbegin KC and Ben Jones, instructed by Brendan Costello of Gordons Partnership, successfully represented the Defendant in a high-profile judicial review concerning the prescription of gender affirming hormones to under 18s, in which MacDonald J refused the Claimant permission to apply for judicial review.’
Old Square Chambers, 1st July 2026
Source: oldsquare.co.uk